subscribing to thread.
Is there a reliably accurate watch for counting lengths when swimming? I suspect Garmin might be the way but I’ve never owned one. Thanks.
Garmin works well, been using my fenix 6 and prior to that the 945 can record lengths well.
Garmin just released the Swim 2 which should suit your needs. There aren't many reviews available yet, but this one goes quite in depth: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dcr...eview.html/amp
As always with fitness watches, take a look at dcrainmaker.com his reviews are in depth and very interesting. Not sure what his current swimming recommendation is, or if he has reviewed the Garmin Swim watch 2 yet as I’m sure this will be one to consider.
My 12 year old daughter swims around 6000m six days a week. I'm buying here one of the new Apple watches for Christmas. I'm not sure if it counts lengths but it does some other cool swimming related stuff.
I use my Garmin Fenix 5, great for me as I use it for hiking, running, MTB and road biking as well.
This may be useful:
https://www.coachmag.co.uk/fitness-t...s-for-swimmers
Garmin works but, as with all smart watches AFAIK, you need to give a good push off to show you’ve started a new length and need to keep going during the length - so not great if swimming in a crowded pool.
Using a dive watch bezel and recording every 10 lengths works best for me.
I use a Garmin Fenix 5, and it is amazingly accurate.
The Garmin comes up most when asking the same question in Google.
Have a look at the DC Rainmaker review site for more in depth info.
Thanks for all the feedback so far. A reliable length counter would allow me to totally zone out when swimming!
Maybe I’m missing a trick here, but in years gone by when I swam regularly I simply counted in my head! Surprised that anything more elaborate is needed, I used to wear a Casio f91 to record the swim time.
I just use a chromo or diver bezel. I know a length takes me 48 - 55 seconds, so it's not too difficult to work out how many I've done. At worst, I might be a couple out, so instead of doing 36 x 50m = 1nm, I might do 34 or 38. But, if I've done ~30 mins, I reckon I've had a reasonable workout...
I swim regularly and use my Apple Watch and it works really well for swimming. It gives plenty of detailed information about my swim including:
- Number of lengths,
- what stroke I used and for how many lengths,
- average time per 100m, 50m and 25m,
- how many calories I burned
- total distance
- average heart rate and graph showing detailed heart rate throughout the swim session
- a detailed breakdown of the times of every distance in the swim session.
It’s really simple too as you just put it into workout mode > Swim when you start and away you go. Then stop it when you've finish and all the information is automatically loaded into the workout app on your phone.
And this is on top of all the other handy stuff an Apple Watch does. I can’t recommend it enough.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by dashfield; 12th November 2019 at 19:42.
Seriously, unless you're training for something, what's the point of all this?
Why not just get in the pool, get on with it, get out, get dressed.....and forget it! Same with running, folks seem to have a fascination with analysing everything, apart from the novelty value I'm struggling to see any point to it.
I went to the gym today, did 10 mins cross-trainer, 1 hr weights, then 5 mins cross-trainer..........end of, over and done, I don't record anything. I don't enjoy it, but I dislike the prospect of not keeping fit.
Sometimes I think the analysis and recording is like a crutch, a substitute for willpower, folks feel like they've got something tangible to keep at the end of it. If you're training for improvement or competition that's different, but if you're doing it for simple fitness I think the Nike logo applies........Just Do It.
You made your point with your first helpful reply. As far as I recall, I posted asking for feedback on smart watch related length counting. I didn’t ask for comments on the motivation or enjoyment of swim training. Why don’t you ignore the post if you find it so banal? Save your ‘breath’ or jog on to the Bear Pit.
Last edited by dejjl; 12th November 2019 at 20:43.
It’s true I don’t need all the heart rate stuff, but I genuinely use the lap counter and timer to set my self goals so I can improve my swimming.
I general swim a mile (64 lengths) and the watch keeps track of the lengths so I don’t need to count. Before I used the watch I would lose count all the time.
Then I use the timer to try to do a mile quicker than I did last time, or improve my average time over 100m during a 45min swim.
So I understand you don’t need all the data the watch provides, but a lot of it is really useful.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have a Garmin Fenix 5s, great for lengths, just tell it how long the pool is and it is perfectly accurate based on that. App is quite good & gives you something called a SWOLF score which is a half decent indicator of your progress if that’s something you are interested in.
It’s been wildly inaccurate for me when it comes to open water swimming though. The GPS on it always trys to put you on the path / ground next to the water if you swim too close to the edge... frustrating.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Last edited by benwisback; 12th November 2019 at 23:03.
So I use WT to ask for advice on a watch matter, you suggest that my needs are not my needs, and then you accuse me of being aggressive in response to your 'valid point', which by the way, adds nothing to debate over the best tool for the job, particularly for those of us who can't count the bloody lengths. Thanks for the benefit of your wisdom.
PS. I might have problems, but I am chilled.
Thanks to all others for the advice. I have a lot to go on here and hope to report back on which I add to the Christmas list.
Last edited by dejjl; 13th November 2019 at 12:04.
Sorry, I’ve never used an Apple Watch for open water , but know (from people who I coach) that they work fine, same as a Garmin would. However, if you want details and flexibility when Tri-training then a Garmin 735XT or 935 or 945 is probably the best bet because they allow you to create brick sessions and custom sets and mix and match sports as you train and provide masses of data to work with.
If you just want to open water swim, neither a Garmin or Apple Watch is better or worse for accuracy (as far as I can tell from swims shown on Strava etc.) and both do the job just fine, I just feel that a Garmin offers more specific options if the training gets serious or you live by data! Also, both will do pool swims and length counts equally well, and I for one like to have the data to demonstrate the improvement I am making (or not!), and to predict with a degree of accuracy my expected results and speeds if I keep training...
Yes they do. I have a Series 4 and it measures my heart rate throughout. Here’s a quick shot of my swim this morning and you can see the heart rate at the bottom, which also scrolls across to show heart recovery rate (you’ll notice I’m not very fit)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Apparently they both do, however the accuracy can be a bit iffy if only using the optical sensor. I’ve not had either but have used my Garmin Swim HR strap and it records absolutely fine, you just can’t get a instant HR with it. However, when I swimming, I don’t think this manages as I can’t see it anyway!