A new piece by Jose re Panerai in 50s/60s movies https://perezcope.com/2022/02/04/vin...he-big-screen/
A new piece by Jose re Panerai in 50s/60s movies https://perezcope.com/2022/02/04/vin...he-big-screen/
Can anyone confirm (or deny) that a P.9010 calibre has hacking seconds? I just picked up a PAM01661 and it does not hack, but I have read in various reviews online that movement does ? Can any owners check? All the best. Martyn.
(with reflections)
Last edited by MartynJC (UK); 19th February 2022 at 19:57.
“ Ford... you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.” HHGTTG
I know the newer movements don’t hack, which I think I’ve read on the Risti forum. Unsure which specifics one’s mind you.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Hi Martyn. The recent 9010s don't hack.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=787757
IMO not a progressive step from Panerai.
At least you know your piece is a recent manufacture.
PS Love the watch. A great version.
Thanks. I just did a google search and found out since after 2020 the movement has been 'updated' with the removal of a hacking seconds. (https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/pane...t-t314021.html)
This is not a big deal for me, as its a small seconds. But was slightly taken aback after reading the 9010 was with a hacking seconds. It's a very comfortable 44mm weighing in at 96g.
“ Ford... you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.” HHGTTG
Popped into the boutique and swapped out the brown alligator for a green rubber. Transforms the watch into the perfect holiday piece
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thinking to pick up my first Pam. Leaning towards a 42mm submersible after trying a few on. Either the azzuro (blue bezel) or the 683:
Last edited by Marios; 15th March 2022 at 19:33.
Borrowed this from a fellow Paneristi to see if it is worth chopping out my 372 and something else for.
Sent from my Nokia 1.4 using Tapatalk
Tried these two on in the Harrods boutique at the weekend as I wanted to see if I could pull off a 47mm sub.
Wish I hadn’t tried the Mike Horn 984 on though as it was lovely. But more than double the cost of the 1305 is just mad and I can think of much better watches to drop £18k on. Still nice though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by Andyp1973; 16th March 2022 at 21:03.
Ill have a 320 going on SC when it comes back from a full service.
RIAC
Popped my Panerai cherry today… I am looking forward to strap shopping:)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Last edited by Stilgoe1972; 22nd March 2022 at 23:41.
This is a bit depressing:
https://perezcope.com/2022/03/27/the...l-downgrading/
Were all the 01661 Carbotech watches produced without hacking seconds? Or did the first production run have hacking seconds?
Stick to the classics
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RIAC
Another classic
Sent from my Nokia 1.4 using Tapatalk
I’ve been looking through reviews of the 01118, 00661 and 01661. I haven’t seen any that hack yet, when they release the crown - the second hand still moves. I may have been unlucky in my review choices though. I do like both the 01118 and 01661 - very cool and a nice alternative to steel. I’ve had a few Carbon Fibre/ceramic watches from different manufacturers and the all black look is definitely preferable to steel for me.
I have the 01118 and it sort of hacks. When you pull out the crown it stops and reverses if you turn the crown back a fraction, it generally holds. Like the older speedy 1861 but better. I also owned the 01661 and it’s exactly the same.
Both are amazing watches you will not be disappointed. I flip way too many watches but the 01118 isn’t going anywhere. Just about perfect.
Fred
I do like both the 01118 and the 01661. I have enquired about one, so we’ll see. I haven’t seen either of them in the flesh yet, which I could probably do with doing. I don’t normally flip watches too often, but I seem to have flipped quite a few at the moment. The carbon fibre watches that I have owned, I’ve enjoyed more than steel equivalents.
Im tempted by a Rose Gold Luminor.
Anyone ever had one and what's the hairline ratio like when up against steel?
Not sure I'd agree. I've always thought the 127 dial looks a little unbalanced because of the sub-seconds and the "9" being there too. Almost as though they had to put the numbers a little further towards the edge of the dial because of the sub-seconds. The 372 has much better balance IMO