Any news now?
Any news now?
Still no.
Eddie
Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".
The other thread alerted me to the fact I haven't been keeping up with this at all. If these come out well, I will definitely be in line for one. I'm "that guy" who bought a CWC quartz reissue in spite of the price. Largely because the aged lume on the bezel matching the dial and hands makes it look rather nice indeed. I didn't care about whether it looks "vintage" or not, I just prefer the softer amber colour to the standard, slightly angry-looking green. Since I bought that one to mark a special date I have to be a bit careful with it, so I'm on the lookout for something similar to wear more frequently as I am a big fan of this design. But not too similar, as I don't want two nearly-identical watches.
For that reason I really like the idea of the blue version. I wonder what other people think about the green lume on the blue dial though? Doesn't look great to me. What's the state-of-the-art these days when it comes to pure white superluminova? The stuff on my Kemmner Octopus seems pretty good. I think that would look perfect with the blue. It would also stop the white date wheel looking so out of place. The hands and bezel lume would need to match of course.
Also wondering, given the plans to expand the Smiths brand, what this would look like with the plain SMITHS text on the dial? Hmm...
Seem to have missed this one! Like the designs, would probably prefer date only or plain dial. Like the DLC with blue dial/bezel option best at the moment.
Missed getting one of the original PRS3 - not really sure why - and this would be a good addition.
Perhaps the blue & yellow versions should have C1 or better yet, BGW-9 lume?
And I'd keep the Precista brand & logo. I like it. And it has legitimate history. That, and boobies would look silly on an MoD dialed mil-diver.
What updates are there on the PRS-3.
I still think Version A (black dial and bezel) is the ultimate, perfect dive watch and I will definitely be in line to buy one even it it means selling sperm, a kidney or a child.
I can't decide between version a or b. I think with the dial configuration I'd go b but if it was no date a
Is there any news on this one? Or perhaps is there an estimates schedule or release order list for anything upcoming?
Like
1st. Expedition
2nd. Speedbird
3rd. Caribbean
4th. PRS-3
Many Thanks
Dear Eddie
I know you have a lot going on right now, but is there any progress on the new 3. or any ideas what, if any, timetable will apply to this model?
Thanks
Dave
I wanted to use an ETA quartz for this model and I was going to start it last month until the manufacturer came back and said ETA had raised the minimum order quantity for quartz movements to 1,000. There's no way I'm taking 1,000 pieces so it's back to the drawing board with the Ronda 715Li.
Eddie
Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".
It's not me they don't want to supply, it's my manufacturer. This surprises me because he manufactures for quite a few microbrands and his demand for movements is high. I thought we might have been able to split the order with some other microbrands but nobody else is currently using this movement. Yes, the Ronda is date only but it's no big deal.
Eddie
Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".
Would there be a no date option?
Sellita SW220-1 instead of quartz?
http://sellita.ch/index.php/en/movements
But would the Seiko NH36 be a possibility?
I think they're about £100 per movement cheaper aren't they(?) - and are known for being robust.
I ask because I was looking at a Seiko SRP775K1 as, due to this lock-down, I'm really beginning to like Day/Date complications - and it was at a very good price.
However, PRS-3, with the same movement, is a LOT more preferable.
Last edited by KAS118; 7th April 2020 at 11:59.
Really hope that this project still comes to life as the design is cracking.
Amongst other things, love the fact that its 39mm and quartz.
The same movement as the PRS-10 (Ronda 715Li) with 10-year battery life would be brilliant.
I'd be more than happy with an Seiko NH36 movement or a Seiko quartz if it's available. Or a not date version with the movement in the prs-10. Personally I don't think a just date version would look right, day date or no date would be great 👍
Casting my vote for blue dial & bezel, white superluminova, quartz movement, no date. Making it a no-date variant solves the problem of not having a DOW complication. It also looks better.
I'm one of those people who does frequently refer to the date on my watch, but I strongly prefer how these look without it. It's not only a question of symmetry, it also causes you to lose 1 (out of 3) numerals on the dial. Which is more disruptive than just losing an index marker.
Surely the gap in the Timefactors range that this is intended to fill demands a quartz movement.
There are currently a few automatic divers for sale on the site (the 82, the Sewills and the Voyager pring to mind) and the Caribbean is also planned as an auto.
With the selling out of the PRS-18, there are no quartz divers left in the range.
I can understand that it's really hard for Eddie to decide how to best cover the right range here. The composite already shows 8 case/dial variations, and these are all with date. To offer them all with non-date as well makes 16 variations, an impossibly broad range for a brand this size to carry in stock for a single model.
I too would prefer a non-date, and if (as it seems) it is to be date only (not day-date as shown), perhaps it should be at 6 for symmetry.
But I sympathise with the choices that have to be made.
Hmmm 樂 I just think 'versions' of this have already been done in Quartz and/or Auto form with or without date (and by that I'm including the PRS-3/3-LE, PRS-14 and PRS-18) whereas a Day Date hasn't been.
Indeed, I'm not sure if they has been any TimeFactors watch with a Day/Date Dial?
Call it the PRS-3DD (which obviously has a nod towards amphibian tank with a Duplex Drive ).
I could understand the concern of a loss of a numeral (which would be the same for a Date version) if it were lumed, but I don't believe it is - so you're only using a small 'lumed' marker - however, if it was a concern leave the '3' numeral there and drop the day/date window down to the 4 position? (Although personally I like it where it is).
I personally hope its a competitively priced mechanical watch and not a quartz - as the PRS-18 was out recently - and I would have thought that the Caribbean's 9015 Movement is now in high demand and will not be as competitively priced as was once possible.
Last edited by KAS118; 12th April 2020 at 14:45.
How about a quartz movement with the appearance of a mechanical movement (e.g. like the ISA9500-1010 that’s in the PRS-37)?
I think it’s far more interesting and distinctive than a regular quartz movement.
Last edited by Dougal; 13th April 2020 at 19:10.
What I always missed at CWC was an automatic version of the SBS diver.
So if you would consider an option for an ETA 2836-2, I am in!
Auto would be highly preferable to quartz IMO. At £250 you can consider this as a preorder.
Why? Bc for a non-diver person wearing a diver is purely about the watch. Not about usability, not about daily convenience, but about the tactile enjoyment. I would not choose a metal diver for climbing, military exercises or anything even vaguely resembling the original conditions for which divers were created. My Suuntos are in every way more useful. For pleasure, yes please, with auto movement.
Well I have worn Auto's when I've gone diving - although admittedly most the time it was a Quartz.
I have nothing against Quartz watches per se, I frequently wear my G10 at the weekend's etc, but I have no desire to add more Quartz to my collection - and I agree with what Hako says, to me mechanicals just have a lot more 'soul' - and IF one could be produced comparatively cheaply, then it would make a great 'every-day-wear watch.
I personally am finding a Day-Date 'nice' to have in this time of lockdown and never ending 'similar' days and I correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think Timefactors has previously offered this - which to me is a good reason for offering it now 🙂
The debate between auto and quartz is a very common and popular issue to discuss in watches forums. Personally I too prefer autos and I have an all mechanical watches collection, apart from the two G shocks I have at the moment.
IMHO this is not the case here. These models have a spicific history not to say legend and putting an irrelevant auto modern mechanism to them sounds a is a little bit odd to me. These models have to be quartz imho. And the price point mentioned sounds great for me. Even in the price point of view, adding a cheap mechanical mechanism, will just make them a cheap mechanical watch, nothing too special.
I absolutely understand the requirements set by the MOD for the SBS Diver Watch to be Quartz back in the 80s. There were good reasons for that.
And I also think at that price point a Quartz movement is the only way to go.
There is no need for an additional DayDate-Diver with a Seiko movement in it.
But it would great to have the option to order the watch with an ETA 2836-2 (or similar Sellita). DayDate-Divers with these higher end movements are hard to find these days.
I like the look but I am not sure If I would get one if it is quartz.
According to this, at least, https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/cw...ced-the-milsub the CWC watch that replaced the Mil Sub was an Auto - hence if the idea of this Project was to make a 'homage' to that watch; then that too should be an Auto.
Similarly, when Quartz first came out they were more expensive than high-grade mechanical watches - they were on the cutting edge of technology. I'm sure, when the first CWC Quartz Diver came out, the price had reduced - but evens so the emphasis in the 80's was all about accuracy - and of course how many functions your Digi Watch had and what tune its alarm played.
However, if you wanted the cutting edge Quartz movement - so as to pay homage to a more cutting edge 1980's diver - then the choice would obviously be a COSC movement. Which of course has already been done.
Things are now vastly different and Quartz is the vastly 'cheaper' option. A lot of people don't wear watches and rely on their Phones or iPads - and for Diving you can rely upon 1, or even 2, computers.
I'd hypothesise that people who buy Microbrands - especially a watch with a nod to a historic military watch - are really looking for something that has a bit of character.
As I understand it, the intention is to have a comparatively 'cheap' watch (Timefactors obviously do offer more 'quality' divers - such as what I feel that the Caribbean will be) and I can see the attraction of having one that you can buy cheaply, is reliable, doesn't need servicing anywhere near as often as a higher grade Swiss - but still ticks.
Basically IMHO, by having a quartz, you' re having a cheap watch what doesn't have the character of a 'cheap' and reliable mechanical - the latter which you could have for a few pounds more.
However, if the concern was to do with the historic nature of the CWC what was favoured to Rolex, then that for that reason to you need it to be powered by a spring rather than a battery.
Hmmm...that's an interesting comment - because I used to shy away from watches with 'Japanese' movements and always considered Swiss was superior.
However, I broke my 'no-Japense' movement philosophy last year when I bought the Newmark 71 with a Miyota 9015 in it. I 'allowed' myself this indulgence because frankly I think the Swiss, or at least Swatch group' were being too up themselves - restricting the sale of their movements.
At the same time as this I bought a Isotope Goutte d'Eau Nordblad (Sellita) and Axiom IXL Montres D'Aviateur (Sellita) an Ianos Avyssos (ETA) and a Yema Superman Heritage (Yema) and all I can say is the 'cheap' movement Newmark has obliterated them in terms of accuracy - its literally about 0.75 secs per day and does not seem to be so adversely affected by the positioning of the watch.
I used to see people posting about their Smiths Everest's being within a second per day accuracy and always thought they were BS'ing a bit - but owning the Newmarck has really opened my eyes.
Sure, the NH36 isn't a top grade movement - but its slow beat, tough of nails, character perfectly suits a Military Diver IMHO 🙂
I’m excited about the quartz PRS-3, if Eddie’s PRS-10 is an example of what to expect. Faithful to the original design, but with upgrades and improvements, and at an affordable price. If options are to be had, I’d rather have a no-date variant than a no-quartz.
Black quartz PRS-3 no date is a sure fire winner seeing as CWC is now so expensive.
Quartz, no date
Looking forward to this. Guess I have missed it but what is the likely ETA? Thank you
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Dear Mr Platts,
Well it looks like you're onto another winner with the PRS3, reading through the thread and fulfilling everyone's essential requirements it's going to be a brilliant Smiths/Precista automatic/quartz, with a matt/gloss aluminium/ceramic bezel, easy strap changing due to the drilled lugs with fixed bars, and the options of - no date, day-date or date only at 3/4 and 6 o'clock, together with steel or PVD finish will no doubt make this a must have yellow, black, orange, blue dive watch.
For balance what ever you decide upon - I'll probably have a yellow one,
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."
"You gotta know when to hold em and know when to fold em".