Originally Posted by
Matt.D
The transition from V10 to V8 was relatively simple compared to the switch to hybrid and didn't need as much lead time, they even tested on track during most of the latter half of 2006 unrestricted, something that wasn't allowed when hybrids were introduced. My comment regarding the ill thought out introduction of hybrids was due to the technology being so advanced and expensive that it was impossible (unless mandated by rules) for a third party such as Cosworth to produce a cost effective engine or drive train of equal performance to the factories, which would have been the ideal pressure release for McLaren now or Red Bull in 2015 (and arguably too for Manor and Caterham). It's daft not having an independent power train readily available because as often has been the case, manufacturers come and go with regular occurrence. Combined with the quite frankly ridiculous homologation and token system that held back development on the grounds of keeping costs under control, which only spiked because of the change of formula in the first place, is why I put the blame for this situation squarely on the rule makers.
(Ref damage to the McLaren brand) - I disagree. Short term it probably doesn't effect things, but long term brand damage is critical. McLaren haven't won a grand prix since 2012. Currently the team's longest dry spell and without a hope of reversing that any time soon. Doesn't look good when selling cars built on a heritage of winning.