Reply With QuoteI took the thread title as a challenge and tried to find a flaw...
... I failed. Lovely watch.
I took the thread title as a challenge and tried to find a flaw...
... I failed. Lovely watch.
Flawless photo I agree. However, not a flawless watch IMO (e.g. chopped 6 marker, no date, the style of the small seconds hand).
I agree with the point about the 6 marker, I don't know why manufacturers bother with that nonsense, it always looks rubbish. The other 2 points, nonsense, it's a gorgeous thing. Great photo too.Originally Posted by jukeboxs
Thanks guys.
I agree with you about the 6, it have been more perfect like this.
Splendid photo Jocke, surprised at how much better it looks with the cut-off 6 missing.
However, that's picky beyond belief, it's stunning! White gold or Pt?
It's WG, the Platinum model have Platinum (silver) hands.
Gotta get me a Lange one day.
Agree with 6 marker - this an esp. bad example.
I'd like to see the second hand match the other two.
Don't mind no date.
Back after a while. With a bang.
Don't mind the chopped6 at all.
Sometimes these small imperfections add to the appeal.
Cut off 6 fail !
So much better without the chopped 6
Oh boy, beautiful watch. Personally, I do find cut-off numbers a little unsettling (even though it gives the watch face a sort-of dynamic tension), but I much prefer it to the F.P.Journe solution of shrinking hour numbers near sub-dials!
Last edited by WatchIng; 1st May 2015 at 23:41. Reason: Typo
Stunningly beautiful watch - but I'd prefer no 6. Would they be able to do one and miss this part off the dial?
It's just a matter of time...
The 'flaw' with this watch is it looks better in blue (IMO)!!!
I can totally understand why this Lange sings to you, one of Lange's finest designs (funnily the cut 6 doesn't bother me).
Don't know about the 6 but that 3 level silver dial is amazing
Nicely done, Jocke. Looks much better with that slight revision.
This is sacrilege and we deserve to be punished, but it's fun too.
Sub seconds moved southward a smidge and seconds hand style changed.
Please forgive my limited photoshop skills.
This is the first picture i have posted here so likewise please forgive me if i haven't done it correctly.
Hi Jocke
Is the Richard Lange Boutique edition?
Marc
Put the little diamond triangle thing back on the second hand, and then post that design over to Lange for me - as that would be my only other dress watch - to go with a Panoinverse - that Jocke has as well!!
This is sacrilege and we deserve to be punished, but it's fun too.
Sub seconds moved southward a smidge and seconds hand style changed.
Please forgive my limited photoshop skills.
This is the first picture i have posted here so likewise please forgive me if i haven't done it correctly.
Actually, I just want the bottom of the 6 removed- all else can stay the same.
It's just a matter of time...
Now that IS perfect (apart form the price!)Thanks guys.
I agree with you about the 6, it have been more perfect like this.
Like that seconds hand.
Prefer previous positions of sub-dial - it had some symmetry - 15/45s markers meeting the depressed part of main dial.
Nope, it's a regular WG 1815.
Good point about the 15 45 marker symmetry.
I cant help but feel that if the chopped 6 is removed it leaves the sub dial stranded somewhat and you would have to do this:
Posting Permissions
