Huh, yeah, tell us about the accuracy in five years' time.
I think I heard somebody say if my Seiko SKX007 was accurate to less than 5 seconds a day, I'd won the lottery.
Well I've had mine on my wrist for a week, and it's gained 3 seconds.
:shock:
Huh, yeah, tell us about the accuracy in five years' time.
WTF. Huh ? Back that statement with facts. Go on ! :?Originally Posted by TheDude
I have a Seiko BM that consistently gains 5 seconds per day, which isn't bad for an auto that cost me £109 :-)
LOLWUTOriginally Posted by oldandgrumpy
English please.Originally Posted by TheDude
Back up your first statement. Go on !
Thats pretty nice ! 8)Originally Posted by seikokiller
WTF? Just suggesting that it's highly unlikely to remain as accurate over a reasonable period of service. Is this controversial?
congratulate :D
It's not as if I'm hugely bothered about accuracey. If I was, I'd wear my quartz.
I just thought that was unusually good.
It probably just means it'll run slow when it settles in or something.
It is good chap :wink:Originally Posted by seikokiller
Nothing wrong with Seikos......
I have old ones that still keep great time....
I have several Seiko's and cannot fault any of there timekeeping.