Just a reminder to one and all that due to a very tired genius this thread is in the G&D
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Yep, very poor form.
DD went out of his way not to offer any expertise, and he said it himself, he has none.
DD is irrelevant when it comes to any new evidence. It is the 14 world renown neonatal experts I listen to.
We live in a world where many folk on the Eleanor Williams CH4 documentary believe she is innocent and that her alleged attackers got away with it. Lives and businesses continue to be ruined.
As I understand it the CCRC don’t get involved in the likelihood of quashing a conviction. They review any new evidence which could have previously jeopardised a fair trial.
Who says anything about the sentence being quashed? I believe if the evidence is deemed significant and the court of appeal agrees, LL will be subject to a retrial.
Last edited by noTAGlove; 5th February 2025 at 13:52.
That is literally how they are contrained by law. From the 'Powers and Practices' section of their website...
We look into all cases thoroughly, independently, and objectively but the legal rules that govern the work of the Commission means that we can only refer a case if we find that there is a ’real possibility’ that an appeal court would quash the conviction or, in the case of an appeal against sentence, change the sentence in question.
(my bold)
edit: anyway, I'm definitely out of this thread (I know I've said that before) - there is a school of thought that she is basically an attention-seeker and she's getting more of mine than she deserves right now.
Last edited by MakeColdplayHistory; 5th February 2025 at 13:55.
You are all idiots, lining up to fall on jimps limp opinionless grenade.
"Bite my shiny metal ass."
- Bender Bending Rodríguez
Not sure where you keep getting this 50% chance of conviction from. As it’s wrong. And others have also pointed this out but you don’t seem to want to accept it.
This is a pointless thread in the wrong area of the forum.
https://www.stuartmillersolicitors.c...each-decision/
If the prosecutor finds that there is a less than 50% chance of conviction, the charging decision must be negative. This is a lower test than the criminal court, where the court must be convinced beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.
I don’t think you’re in a position to throw stones as it was in response to your own post that regarding a claim POTUS had made or not. And I used AI precisely to keep it factual rather than expressing my opinion, which didn’t stop you from jumping on another political topic.Originally Posted by oldoakknives;
Furthermore my comment was not about the matter discussed but the language used.
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.
Show me where my post was an opinion as my contention was that it was factual (unlike my previous post).
But the fact that you cannot access the BP means this is the only place where you can voice your political inclinations and you often succumb to the temptation, whereas when it happens to me it's usually a mistake as it is sometimes difficult to know on which sub-forum you're posting on Tapatalk.
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Just another example of your approach to the use of this forum.
Watch this and see what kind of man the prosecutions expert witness is.
Read the comments from others,he has destroyed lives.
Its like he lives for the limelight.
All those deaths and he made his mind up in 10 minutes after putting himself forward as the expert.
Do some small research if you want the truth.
Must be true its on YouTube.
Bit of an assumption, he lives for the limelight? It seems his assistance is requested / sought out by the Police / CPS.
And he destroys lives, really? He gives his considered medical opinion on the evidence that is presented to him. It is then for the court, jurors and judge to take that and other expert witnesses testimony to decide on guilt.
You do talk a lot of nonsense and seem to have a lot of bias towards the authorities and anyone deemed on their side.
- - - Updated - - -
A bit like your poor choices in clothing / boots / BB Guns.