Certainly wasn't end to end stuff. More like side to side. A fairly tedious watch with the odd moment of excitement thrown in.
Could be the squad changes Dave as you suggest. Moot really innit now in fairness. Hopefully Sunday's ref is even handed.
Onwards to Sunday.
I'm for watching it on the big screen in our neighbourhood association bar/ restaurant, should be a good laugh, atmos...cerveza's are certainly the right price, frosted glasses straight from freezer, bonus.
Have a look at the infringement. Pause at 40 seconds then use the < and > keys to step forwards / backwards by one frame at a time. The defense move looks like something out of MMA. You can also see at least four England players immediately appeal to the ref.
Anyway, the was it / wasn't it question has now been definitvely answered. GBNews says it wasn't a penalty, so it definitely was.
One of the good things in the tournament has been the absence of VAR getting involved in ridiculous decisions and giving penalties for nothing especially the hand ball incidents
Nobody would have batted an eyelid on this when it was correctly not given.
Ref should have stuck to his guns when going to the monitor.
Can you imagine the uproar if the penalty decision had been the other way around and the Netherlands were awarded a pen for the same event.
Christ guys, who gives a rats arse?
Too many times we’ve gone out on a dodgy ref decision, disallowed goal, etc etc
It was a penalty given and it was dispatched really well. We won 2-1, we’re in the final.
Who cares, let’s take the win and look forward to winning something FFS.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The penalty was harsh - but who cares payback for 92 koeman (who I will add was hugely gracious in defeat didnt moan about it conceded we were very good on the night etc)
Maradonna handball, campbells goal in 2004, lampards over the line, etc etc you need the breaks to win tournaments and we got it
I was at Box Park Wembley last night and the atmosphere was electric throughout and what a way to win the scenes were amazing!!!
Some days you're the statue, some days you're the seagull.
https://youtu.be/o5QlBHF6ib8?si=RRmhkYfJY05KcSi2
Take the win and STFU.
... and some days you're the trawler.
Anyway are we still sacking Southgate?
Watkins and Palmer looked dynamite when they came on, they should definitely start on Sunday.
Re the penalty, pretty obvious to me, studs up challenge in the box? Foul anywhere else on the pitch, do it in the box it's a pen.
Foden incredibly unlucky with his two efforts.
Cheers,
Neil.
NOT A CHANCE hell make wholesale changes like that and why would he???
the only possible change for me is shaw for Trippier as i think the balance of the team is better but I expect hell start the same team
His subs have all worked he trusts the players and the subs to do the job - and its worked for him
I don't think it was a penalty but your side played a decent game (at last!) and Watkins' goal was fantastic. Just a shame it had to be against us.
You're going to need a miracle this Sunday though.
Having reflected for 24 hours I'd have to concede that it's a penalty in the modern game. I don't agree but I understand why it was given. If Kane was passing that ball down the line and, after the ball was played, Dumfries catches him in the way he did then it's given as a foul every time.
Oh FFS! Viva Espana!!!!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...land-win-euros
Keir Starmer has said he wants to “mark the occasion” if England win the Euros football tournament, after the team beat the Netherlands to secure a place in Sunday’s final.
However, the prime minister stopped short of confirming there would be a bank holiday if Gareth Southgate’s team emerged victorious from their final against Spain, saying that he did not want to “jinx” the outcome.
The Liberal Democrats have led calls for an extra bank holiday after England claimed a 2-1 victory over the Netherlands on Wednesday.
Starmer previously supported calls for a bank holiday when England’s women’s football team made it to the World Cup final last year.
He had one foot up to block a shot - other foot was on the ground. Not reckless not out of control and trying to clear the ball not swinging towards the attacker. Kanes follow through hit him. Looks a perfectly natural attempt to block by the defender to me
As for studs up sorry but that’s not studs up. You can see it’s his toe that is almost contacting the ball. Lane strikes the studs from the bottom up - his studs are facing the turf in the picture above. And let’s not forget Saka handled it twice a second before which the ref and var team conveniently ignored completely. Good luck to England but justifying this penalty as a correct decision is laughable. The hand ball is here https://twitter.com/Tribalgooner91/s...63220318785823
Last edited by RustyBin5; 12th July 2024 at 08:21.
Well I do live in Spain, have done for the last 13 years, and I love it. The Spanish lads have played with skill and passion beating the likes of France and Germany to deservedly win their place in the final. The England teams performance has been decidedly unimpressive, extra time, penalty merchants, dodgy Ref assistance...as one comment I read the other day eloquently put it... To try and compare Spain's performance with England´s is like comparing marmalade with poop, well in fairness he used the S word but G n D . Chuckle.
Viva Espana...consider it a kindness, the last thing you lot need is another Bank Holiday, it will only rain.
New at McDonalds, free Dum-Fries with your burger.
Got a new watch, divers watch it is, had to drown the bastard to get it!
It is what it is, on to the final and hopefully a nice surprise.
Got a new watch, divers watch it is, had to drown the bastard to get it!
Is it absolutely conclusive from the video that the ball touches his hand, though, because it doesn't change trajectory? Maybe VAR did check it and couldn't be sure or checked the snickometer? I'd be interested to hear their explanation.
I heard an interesting argument that if Harry's shot was on target the ball would've hit the defenders foot so it would've been a good block. It's a minefield with all the different aspects, difficult for VAR to consider everything in a short space of time. I'd still say if the defender is jumping towards the ball and Harry, it's an attempted tackle and he has to get to the ball first.
Yes I've seen it from another angle now, it's his right hand that contacts the ball as it bounces up from the ground. There's no way he could have avoided that unless he only had one arm though and his arm was in a natural position. The referee didn't give the handball so it wouldn't be a clear and obvious error for VAR to overule (unlike not giving the foul on Kane).
If his raised left arm / hand catches it, that's handball but I'm not sure it does.
Last edited by watchcollector1; 12th July 2024 at 16:58.
I think it’s pretty clear from the amount of professionals that are saying it’s never a penalty (including former England players) that the supposed foul on Kane wasn’t a clear and obvious error either. Anyway lots of people don’t agree either way so it’s a talking point. I just honestly think if a Dutch player had handled twice and then had a shot that kicked an English defender resulting in a Dutch penalty the views of quite a few would be the polar opposite- understandable of course.