closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Size isn’t everything

  1. #1

    Size isn’t everything

    I have recently dug my Dad’s 1982 Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date ref 15000 out of a drawer.
    What a lovely thing. Not been worn for 25+ years but a quick set and careful wind and it’s running beautifully.
    34mm is quite enough and a lovely original classic.




    No box or papers, but who cares?!?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Master M1011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    3,273
    A nice treasure to pull out of a drawer!

  3. #3
    Grand Master TaketheCannoli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    19,086
    What a shame it hasn’t been worn for that long.

  4. #4
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    51
    Great looker, even after all these years, ware with pride

  5. #5
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    England
    Posts
    335
    Great timepiece, glad its getting the wear it deserves......I agree with the sizing, I have a 1965 Tissot Seastar in 34mm which just seems to suit the watch perfectly especially on the bracelet and there's just something about these mid-century watches where the smaller case size just seems to work.

  6. #6
    Master TheGent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    North West, UK
    Posts
    2,977
    Beautiful watch - really doesn’t get much better than that.

  7. #7
    34-36mm is ideal.

    I go no larger than a 5 digit rolex these days (long gone are my Planet Oceans and Panerais)

    Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    One of my favourite references - I would suggest you consider having it serviced if you are going to regularly wear it - thanks for sharing.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,519
    Worth getting it properly serviced and lightly refinished to restore to its former glory, then use it as intended! Regardless of the sentimental value it's far too nice to not be used.

    I don`t advocate using it without getting it serviced first, lubrication will be non-existent and that's going to exacerbate wear. I would also get it refinished and looking as it was supposed to look when your dad bought it. These are easy to refinish and really do look much sharper for it.

    I would send it to a Rolex accredited indy or someone with extensive Rolex experience such as Bill Rice, he's no longer Rolex accredited but he was for many years.

  10. #10
    Thanks. And yes it struggled a little today when moving the date on so will need a full service.
    I usually do servicing at Rolex and otherwise have used Russell Talerman (Indy in central london) a few times so may go back to them again.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #11
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Yorkshireman at heart
    Posts
    3,188
    Blog Entries
    2
    I have this from 1982 as well. 34mm which wears bigger because of the narrow bezel. I really like the matching champagne coloured date wheel.


  12. #12
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North of nowhere
    Posts
    7,474
    When it's all dial, 34mm is plenty.

    Lovely piece.

  13. #13
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    954
    Love it

    Desperate to find a birth year watch -1986 but it’s a minefield out there


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #14
    Fantastic, look forward to the post service pictures, bet it will look a million dollars post a light fettle

    Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information