closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 40 of 40

Thread: 14060m service

  1. #1
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595

    14060m service

    Picked up a 2002 14060M from the forum after getting a PM responding to my wanted Ad

    free image hosting sites

    No card but a modern box and in really good condition. Obviously the price reflected this and I wore it for about 2 months really falling for the simplicity of the ND

    I always intended to put it though Rolex for a 24 months warranty and adding to the pieces history

    I did however notice it was out about 10 seconds a day and a slight squeak appeared when winding the crown

    So anyway into Rolex and here’s the verdict from AD

    Dear Mr Holmes,

    Thank you for entrusting us with your Rolex timepiece; it is our pleasure to provide the quotation outlined below, where we have itemised the quotation into necessary and optional work. Following careful examination by a Master Watchmaker, diagnostics have shown that to return your timepiece to its original functional and aesthetic specifications, the following interventions and/or components are required:

    The following work is deemed necessary:

    A complete service £630.00
    A replacement crown - existing is dented £40.00
    A new sapphire crystal - existing is chipped £110.00

    The following work is deemed optional:

    For an overall total of £752.00

    What’s funny I really didn’t notice a chip or a dent but said happy to proceed and looking forward to getting it back

    Question is if I’d refused the Crystal or crown replacement it looks like they wouldn’t have serviced it, which I find odd.

  2. #2
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    I think they are quite exacting on marks/damage to crowns.

    Only if the ‘chips’ on crystal is likely to affect waterproofness will they insist on renewal from what I understand.

    A Seadweller 16600 service is £600, which seems unusual considering the helium escape valve that model has.

    I got a call from dealer yesterday, saying that crystal renewal was ‘optional’ but since the marks on edge of crystal were so slight - I opted to leave original.

  3. #3
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    7,646
    I'd be optioning not to get it polished either as case looks perfect.

  4. #4
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,040
    Blog Entries
    1
    Service is service, rest is cosmetic only so optional. As mentioned if it affected integrity then it wouldn't be optional.

    Rolex noted a mark on my SD bezel which I hadn't with my eyesight but sure enough, under magnification it was there. They really do look VERY closely for blemishes.

    Polishing is included but yeh - don't let them polish unless it absolutely needs it.

  5. #5
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Quote Originally Posted by blackal View Post
    I think they are quite exacting on marks/damage to crowns.

    Only if the ‘chips’ on crystal is likely to affect waterproofness will they insist on renewal from what I understand.

    A Seadweller 16600 service is £600, which seems unusual considering the helium escape valve that model has.

    I got a call from dealer yesterday, saying that crystal renewal was ‘optional’ but since the marks on edge of crystal were so slight - I opted to leave original.
    My Explorer has a small surface mark on it and the AD who is an accredited repairer and hence works strictly to Rolex instructions told me that even the smallest nick or scratch on the crystal means it has to be removed and that is non negotiable.

    I just live with that.

  6. #6
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    4,101
    I have a 16610 bought off here which had a Rolex service in 2015 ish. They replaced the crystal at that service. They probably use a loupe to look around the edge. If any tiny nicks or scratches are present then it makes sense to swap it out at service.

  7. #7
    Master murkeywaters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Near the sea
    Posts
    7,131
    Sometimes it does come across too much when Rolex want to replace a nigh on perfect crystal, personally the less that is messed with during service the better, thats just me, I prefer watches to grow old gracefully but also understand a lot of people want their watch to look like new.

    When my Rolex need a service I'll probably check them into the watchworks near me for a movement only service and general clean..

  8. #8
    Fantastic looking watch - the simplicity of the dial just looks so well balanced.
    It seems like they are good at spotting damage when they can charge for it; in my experience somewhat less so when they are responsible for causing it!
    Wear your watch in good health


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Quote Originally Posted by adg31 View Post
    Fantastic looking watch - the simplicity of the dial just looks so well balanced.
    It seems like they are good at spotting damage when they can charge for it; in my experience somewhat less so when they are responsible for causing it!
    Wear your watch in good health
    I think you are correct on both counts.

    The 14060M is a super-clean design - much better than the cyclopsed one.

  10. #10
    Nice watch. I don’t think Rolex wording is suggesting the extra work is mandatory

  11. #11
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,519
    The crystal needs to come out to refinish the case, so it makes sense to replace it if it has any significant faults or damage. It’s surprising how owners miss things and don’t see the blemishes. It’s worth inspecting the crystal carefully before sending the watch for service and deciding in advance whether you’re happy with the condition.

    A perfect crystal always helps when selling.

  12. #12
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    All great information guys, thank you.. I don’t mind it being polished, I intend on wearing it regularly and want it to start with a fresh slate. It’s hardly marked and can’t see it suffering too much with a polish.

  13. #13
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    Here she blows. Wow blow away with how it’s come back to me. The movement’s now buttery smooth, and the finishing fantastic. New Crystal and new crown replaced, no S on the Crystal.

    Oh and the new service pouch too is very impressive.









    drop off service menu

  14. #14
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    5,827
    Blog Entries
    1
    Very nice, on my wish list but I’d need a windfall …

  15. #15
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Looking good!

    Don't think my SD will be far away.

  16. #16
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    The subs altogether


  17. #17
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    The subs altogether

    If you sent your hands to Rolex - they'd insist on renewing them!!!!

    A nice collection!

  18. #18
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by blackal View Post
    If you sent your hands to Rolex - they'd insist on renewing them!!!!

    A nice collection!
    Hehe, I thought exactly that. They don’t look as knackered in real life.

  19. #19
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    Hehe, I thought exactly that. They don’t look as knackered in real life.

    Checked mine before I commented. Nothing wrong with hands that have done a life of honest work.................

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    Were you doing 10yrs' hard labour?

  20. #20
    Grand Master wileeeeeey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    19,254
    I’ve got true office boy hands but you can tell my eyes have done 15 years hard labour staring at a screen and my body has done the same 15 years sat down!

    Can’t wait for those service pouches to hit SC, they look good.

  21. #21
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    21
    I had my 14 year old 14060M serviced last year by Rolex, best thing I did, it literally came back a new watch. it was a no brainer to change the glass (It was less than £110 - I think £60) so prices must have gone up.

    My glass looked on, but if you ran your nail around the edge, you would feel roughness

  22. #22
    Master RJM25R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Wondering why people with no interest in watches are on a watch forum?
    Posts
    7,990
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    The subs altogether

    Nice set however that 16613 looks out of place……… :-)

  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by blackal View Post
    If you sent your hands to Rolex - they'd insist on renewing them!!!!

    A nice collection!
    Fantastic group!
    Hands are just fine though it will not stop RSC from recommending a light polish and changing the top layer of skin:-)

  24. #24
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    378
    Fantastic collection. I’ve never had a two liner sub just a 1680 and 16600. I really should give one a spin. Congratulations on getting that sub


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  25. #25
    Looks like a lovely result. My 14060M is also running about 10 fast, I've only worn a handful of times and otherwise looks like new, so hopefully doesn't need any parts. Can I ask how long it took from drop off at the AD to getting it back?

    thanks!

  26. #26
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by stevebuk View Post
    Looks like a lovely result. My 14060M is also running about 10 fast, I've only worn a handful of times and otherwise looks like new, so hopefully doesn't need any parts. Can I ask how long it took from drop off at the AD to getting it back?

    thanks!
    10th December - 18th February

    Took the 16613 yesterday, because it`s hardly ever been worn the crown started playing up. Wouldn`t always pull out

  27. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    10th December - 18th February

    Took the 16613 yesterday, because it`s hardly ever been worn the crown started playing up. Wouldn`t always pull out
    Thanks, not too bad. I'll take it in. Daft q, but I assume I just take the watch on its own?

  28. #28
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by stevebuk View Post
    Thanks, not too bad. I'll take it in. Daft q, but I assume I just take the watch on its own?
    that`s right, then you get the new flash leather service case on its return

  29. #29
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Taken to Laings in Edinburgh 2nd December. Ready for collection now.

    12 weeks over Xmas/NY.

  30. #30
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    So my 16613 starting becoming very difficult pulling the crown out, now that watch is mint and here we go, new crystal again. Seems a standard procedure. 14 weeks lead time now

    The following work is deemed necessary: -



    A complete service £630.00

    A new sapphire glass - existing is chipped and no longer providing the necessary seal to protect your watch against moisture ingress £110.00

    The following work is deemed optional:

    N/A

    For an overall total of £740.00

  31. #31
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,878
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    So my 16613 starting becoming very difficult pulling the crown out, now that watch is mint and here we go, new crystal again. Seems a standard procedure. 14 weeks lead time now

    The following work is deemed necessary: -



    A complete service £630.00

    A new sapphire glass - existing is chipped and no longer providing the necessary seal to protect your watch against moisture ingress £110.00

    The following work is deemed optional:

    N/A

    For an overall total of £740.00
    If the watch is a Rolex Classic as opposed to Current or Vintage, I think you may need to add £300 to the £630 figure.

  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Kent/SW London
    Posts
    1,669
    If was to send in my 14060m for a service, would they accept a head only watch? It's currently on a bracelet from a Explorer II and I am worried that they will confiscate this bracelet and charge me for a replacement Submariner bracelet. Any advice gratefully received.

  33. #33
    Craftsman woodruffm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Surrey, Uk
    Posts
    377
    Quote Originally Posted by rico View Post
    If was to send in my 14060m for a service, would they accept a head only watch? It's currently on a bracelet from a Explorer II and I am worried that they will confiscate this bracelet and charge me for a replacement Submariner bracelet. Any advice gratefully received.
    Put it on a cheap nato, although I'm sure they're going to add the bracelet and charge you for it. Otherwise send it into a Rolex accredited service centre, like watchworks in Bristol.

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

  34. #34
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    derbyshire
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by joe narvey View Post
    If the watch is a Rolex Classic as opposed to Current or Vintage, I think you may need to add £300 to the £630 figure.
    The 16613 is a 2006 and my 14060m is a 2001/02.

    The quote is exactly that and that’s what’ll I’ll pay them.

  35. #35
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,878
    Quote Originally Posted by forest172 View Post
    The 16613 is a 2006 and my 14060m is a 2001/02.

    The quote is exactly that and that’s what’ll I’ll pay them.
    That’s a result.

  36. #36
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,751
    Quote Originally Posted by woodruffm View Post
    Put it on a cheap nato, although I'm sure they're going to add the bracelet and charge you for it. Otherwise send it into a Rolex accredited service centre, like watchworks in Bristol.

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

    Is anyone Rolex accredited nowadays, without conforming to exactly the same criteria as if it has gone to RSC?

  37. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by woodruffm View Post
    Put it on a cheap nato, although I'm sure they're going to add the bracelet and charge you for it. Otherwise send it into a Rolex accredited service centre, like watchworks in Bristol.

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
    That is complete and utter bollocks. They would not add a bracelet unless you wanted one.

  38. #38
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,116
    From my experience they will do whatever work you sign up to, and then give you options.

    My service has now come back down to £630 and initially agreed to have the glass to be replaced.

    I said that I would not auto authorise a bracelet replacement, especially as they now say they will not give back the original one.

    Only another 8 weeks or so to wait.

  39. #39
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Washington , England
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by blackal View Post
    I think you are correct on both counts.

    The 14060M is a super-clean design - much better than the cyclopsed one.

    The exact reason I bought one over 20 years ago , I’ve not changed my mind since either.

  40. #40
    Yep

    Absolutely superb watch. Unmatched in its era IMO

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information