Yes, meds have actually been withheld.
I am currently without meds that I would not be without had they not been withheld by the GP.
I explicitly said so in
#1,
#3, and
#13.
I wonder again, are you being wilfully blind or merely on a mission to provoke anger by your refusal or inability to read what has been written. What is your agenda here?
I would agree, if that was all it was. However, as I pointed out, meds have been wholly withheld. You do seem incapable of reading the bits that don't suit your preferred narrative, don't you. I said that meds have been wholly withheld.
I agree. But it is not any more safe to wholly withhold meds that are in fact needed. In yet that is the problem that I have explicitly pointed out.
You are in effect re-stating your previous insult about "prams" and "toys".
My concern is, as stated, about a threat to my health due to the what has been done (no matter how well-meaning it might have been).
You characterise what I have said as "scream"ing and "sensationalis"ing but no, I have merely stated the facts in a clear and accurate manner. Clearly that is deeply discomforting to you.
You have your reasons to respond in the way you do, including insulting me and putting words into my mouth, but whatever they are, they are not helpful here.
As I have also pointed out several times now, I think it was well-meaning but in reality it was (a) a toxic way to coerce compliance and (b) both threatening to, and actually harmful, to my health. In other words, despite being well-meaning it was counter-productive.