Reply With QuoteNice watches, i had the £2900 version that is slightly different and loved it except the strap had the half link system for sizing.
The black dial, hands and indices were top class and have to be seen in person.
Six measurements over three weeks:
Nice watches, i had the £2900 version that is slightly different and loved it except the strap had the half link system for sizing.
The black dial, hands and indices were top class and have to be seen in person.
can i ask what app you're using to do this please?
Why is it rounding -0.6 up to 0 not down to -1?
It isn't. It started off 0.6 seconds behind, it's still only 0.5 seconds behind. It's only gained 0.1 seconds during the measurement time, that's pretty much 0 per day.Originally Posted by vortgern
Anyway, 0.1 seconds could easily be measurement error, it's pretty much bang on.
I think it is saying it was 0.6 s slow on the 7th September and 0.5 s slow now so there has been an overall delta of 0.1 s.
Can I ask what app you are using to take these measurements please. Thanks ~S
The very slight variations are caused by the fact that I have to hit a button on the app which won’t be exactly the same every time. So as it’s only 0.01 I think we can treat that as being pretty much spot on.
It’s the Watch Tracker app.
My SBGX was 0.0 after 6 months I timed it. It’s insane, even for a quartz.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posting Permissions