Reply With QuoteA bracelet on a PRS-29A would be totally unsuitable for that style of watch. IMHO.
I really really want to get a oyster like bracelet for the PRS-29A, with microadjustment. Either that, or the Everest with antimagnetic protection.
It's a pity because I want an inexpensive Explorer type field watch with antimagnetic protection, and the bracelet of the Explorer really completes the look. The Everest with bracelet captures the look but doesn't have the antimagnetic protection of the PRS-29A, so I'm kinda sad that Smiths doesn't just either provide a bracelet for the PRS-29A or make the Everest antimagnetic. :-(
A bracelet on a PRS-29A would be totally unsuitable for that style of watch. IMHO.
F.T.F.A.
The Everest has got Anti-Magnetic protection according to the specs:
T.G.
I totally agree. The original would have had solid bars anyway.Originally Posted by magirus
"The whole purpose of mechanical watches is to be impertinent." ~ Lionel a Marca, CEO of Breguet
The only bracelet I can think of working on a 29a is a Bonklip
Used to have one as shown below - it ended up back on Perlon though as most watches Ive owned have
I was thinking bonklip too. I had the Jospeh Bonnie one and it was very comfortable.
The Speedbird (baby or regular) is anti-magnetic and comes on a bracelet, though not an oyster bracelet.
4800 is the basic antimagnetic resistance of the most basic mechanical movement. It isn't enough.The Everest has got Anti-Magnetic protection according to the specs:
T.G.
Enough for…?
T.G.
I bought a Milanese strap for the white PRS 29AM and it looks ace in my opinion, one on the left.IMG_5408.JPG
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
I asked the manufacturer to uprate the anti-magnetic properties of the new batch of Everests and he replied "it's always been 20,000A/m".
Eddie
Whole chunks of my life come under the heading "it seemed like a good idea at the time".
brilliant!
T.G.
Posting Permissions
