I enthusiastically support the views expressed above. A most thoughtful review of a GS earlier this week received 3 responses and less views than the most mediocre SC offerings . The Rolex lobby sometimes behaves in an insidious way towards doubters - Huertecilla's content was at least interesting. Rolex has become the pondweed of TZ UK.
The majority of people participating in Rolex only sub forum will be people saying I don’t want to buy Rolex / I am not interested in Rolex because......blah blah
Just like the usual Rolex threads 😂😂😂
Once again I agree with you. The simple, if unpalatable, reality is that Rolex owners are hardly interested in any other make and thus tend to restrict their comments about Rolex. However there is also a contingent who spend a lot of time slagging off Rolex just because the Rolex owners enthuse about Rolex.
There are quite a few members that will not waste an opportunity to have a moan about Rolex, which then continues the threads about Rolex - it’s almost funny...
The reality is that Rolex owns the luxury watch market, with an almost 25% share of the global market - the next player is Omega with only around 8.5%. Poor Longines at number 3 slot and 6.5% of the market hardly get a look in on a lot of forums (but that’s improved in the last year with a better range of watches); Patek at 6% and Cartier at 5.5% also only sporadically get the spotlight.
So just looking at the figures, it’s bloody obvious that Rolex is going to get a lot of attention. Bitching about it isn’t going to change reality.
It's just a matter of time...
I just cannot see the problem in being able to frequent the TZ forum on a regular basis without buying watches all the time.
I'd be happy to see the Rolex topics in a sub-forum, then I could just ignore it like the Bear Pit.
We all know what a Sub or a Daytona look like, any changes will be so small as to be irrelevant to anyone but the already interested.
The threads asking whether someone should prostitute their daughter/sell a kidney/buy a laughable undesirable Rolex to have a vague chance of being allowed to buy a stainless steel diver are, surely we all agree, tiresome too.
But, of course, they'd creep back into the general topics, because someone would ask for advice on a sub-£500 diver and in 10 posts, people would be suggesting he get down to 'his AD' to get on 'the list' and wait for 'the call'.
M
Breitling Cosmonaute 809 - What's not to like?
I hope you’ll be back. I dropped out of the watch world about 10 years ago but my interest has returned and after selling off a bunch of stuff I had hiding in my sock drawer, I’ve gone a bit “ Gary Busey” and have been having fun buying loads of stuff with a Space and Pilot watch theme. At first I thought everything was so much more expensive but it didn’t take long to readjust and find some gems.
Regards
Jon.
Just like pondweed!
Besides, as TZUK sells advertising and a demographic of Rolex buyers presumably attracts advertisers, so the incentive to change might not be immediately obvious.
For each of us amateurs, it really comes down to whether or not, on aggregate, we find the time spent hanging out here worthwhile and enjoyable. For myself, that depends on the variety and interest of the contributions but equally on a prevailing ethos of enthusiasm, friendliness and general good humour and I do believe certain of these fundementals have changed in recent years.
The likes of me wouldn’t be such a great loss here, but interesting and insightful contributors draw in viewers. They are scarce, carry an intangible but disproportionately high net value and their voices deserve consideration.
Pete
It's just a matter of time...
The interest in Rolex is surely exactly what we should expect. The brand outsells all other similar brands by a large margin. All this forum does is reflect that. The logic of some of these threads is ‘ we should ignore the most popular brands.’.
Good luck with that.