Reply With QuoteI remember seeing one of these when they first came out in a jewelers window in Malta. It was a double wow moment.
1st wow for how it looked. 2nd wow for how much it cost!
Yes
No
Don't care
I can't get this watch out of my mind (picture from web)
but would most likely sell this one as I can't see having too many gold Rolex:
Obviously would need to fill the gap with a significant wad of cash too (but having sold the AP that is not an issue). I do have the 126655 in a holding pattern but obviously the dealer won't hold for ever.
Struggling here guys! What would you do?
For a bit of fun - maybe complete the Poll as above :-)
Last edited by MartynJC (UK); 3rd October 2020 at 20:27.
I remember seeing one of these when they first came out in a jewelers window in Malta. It was a double wow moment.
1st wow for how it looked. 2nd wow for how much it cost!
The GMT looks much better to me, probably the best colour combination. YM is a bit of a marmite, I guess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I really like the RG YM40 on Oysterflex and I'm not a big fan of the CHNR so I would sell one to fund the other. You've been through quite a few watches recently so I would be scared you don't bond and take a bath selling the YM.
I had the 116655 and whilst it’s absolutely stunning and I want another one I sold it pretty quick as I felt that despite the stealthy rubber the rose gold just felt too bling. Now, part of that might be my pasty colouring but it always felt a little ostentatious (not a criticism, I still want another) and visible for me. YMMV as it is a stunner.
I just checked - this year I've bought / sold the AP ROO and sold the Omega Deep Black since lock down - low turn over compared to some. But still I know what you mean.Originally Posted by wileeeeeey
My plan is to reduce to some higher value watches eventually - maybe sell 2 / 3 mid range (Breitling / Zenith etc) for the YM40 rather than the CHNR would be another option..
YMMV?
Last edited by MartynJC (UK); 3rd October 2020 at 20:58.
I was interested in the Rose-gold Yachtmaster when they first came our, several years ago. But I didn’t buy because, for me, they seemed a bit ˜bling’. It was only when the 42mm white gold version arrived last year that I was properly tempted. Rolex got the design spot-on with this version.
In fact, for my taste, it;s the best looking watch Rolex currently make. Although I suspect rose gold will sell better.
It’s the only mechanical watch I own, so hopefully I’ve cured of the itch for change. We live in hope....
Last edited by paskinner; 3rd October 2020 at 21:01.
YOLO
I am intrigued - is it really 42mm diameter? Could I ask a favour - could you measure the diameter and width lug to lug across the watch face? I am curious if the size is marketing or real sizing - aka the new models.I was interested in the Rose-gold Yachtmaster when they first came our, several years ago. But I didn’t buy because, for me, they seemed a bit ˜bling’. It was only when the 42mm white gold version arrived last year that I was properly tempted. Rolex got the design spot-on with this version.
In fact, for my taste, it;s the best looking watch Rolex currently make. Although I suspect rose gold will sell better.
Both RG and WG easily available - both have been in the window of Mappin and Webb in Kingston recently.
My brother has this watch and the full golf CHNR and it’s the latter that gets most wear, though he says they are both great watches.
Martyn I would watch the Watchfinder video on YouTube of the Omega Seamaster Titanium v Rolex Yachtmaster. As you’ve owned the Omega it will give you some food for thought I would think, even thought it’s white instead of rose.
Last edited by Devonian; 3rd October 2020 at 21:22.
6 weeks ago you had a similar thread about a PP - where you concluded you would slow down and enjoy what you have. Consider what's changed since then and why.
Can’t answer this one I’m afraid
But I haven’t a clue why you sold the AP in favour of either
Sorry an’ all that!
In terms of size the 42mm seems very slightly larger than the 40mm, but it certainly doesn’t seem a particularly big watch. It’s always personal, but the slight difference feels marginal to me. I prefer the larger size.
A key factor is the fit of the Oysterflex. Because of the internal bellows, the strap tends to bulge out slightly on the wrist. It’s very comfortable, but not easy to get looking sleek . On the other hand, it is effective in stopping the heavy gold watch sliding around the wrist.
Nothing is perfect....so I suppose we have to settle at some point, or drive ourselves nuts.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Last edited by paskinner; 3rd October 2020 at 21:23.
This. If I didn’t already have one I would be trading either one of the these, plus a testicle, for the AP. It’s in a different league.
I have the same issue as you. The itch never stops...I am hoping to cure it one day, but for now I feel your pain.
It is a personal choice I guess. I had the CHNR for a short while and did not bond with that brown colour. Having said that, in your pics it looks good on that bracelet vs. the yachtmaster on oysterflex. Not sure I would want to make that switch with I am guessing a good chunk of cash leaving your bank account in the process. Good luck with making the decision.
Seems odd that they still have the 40mm RG, whilst they have released the 42mm WG. I would have thought that they will discontinue the smaller size and release a 42mm in RG, which I would prefer - probably the main reason why I haven’t tried one myself
Both superb watches
I prefer the white gold version for looks but at 42mm would maybe wear too big for me.
If you have the itch resistance is futile
Get it done.
Ah Martyn the story never ends - the Root Beer (GMT is pretty nice actually saw it someone yesterday)
The Yachtmaster is definitely sportier with the rubber bracelet.
I’d vote YM!
S
The ROO was just at the limit of comfort for me - so had to go to a good home on TZ. I have seen a pattern, that I tend to sell anything above 42mm - must make mental note!!
your mileage may vary. I’m so street
Don't blame you for wanting less watches but of a higher value. I wouldn't mind consolidating two or three for one higher value watch at some point but I'm a way off from that yet.
Last edited by wileeeeeey; 4th October 2020 at 00:39.
Noted - I do have a deposit on a RG version @ Bond St WoS - just need to fill the gap..
I love the look of that GMT. The YM looks nice but I can’t seem to get my head around that sort of money for a non PM bracelet. Whatever you choose you’re going to have a nice watch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have mine at home at the moment if you need any measurements. I also have my snazzy new vernier thingy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Rosie has long been my favourite looking modern Rolex.
Do it!
Agree, this would be my one watch. Tried it on recently and ticked every box.I was interested in the Rose-gold Yachtmaster when they first came our, several years ago. But I didn’t buy because, for me, they seemed a bit ˜bling’. It was only when the 42mm white gold version arrived last year that I was properly tempted. Rolex got the design spot-on with this version.
In fact, for my taste, it;s the best looking watch Rolex currently make. Although I suspect rose gold will sell better.
It’s the only mechanical watch I own, so hopefully I’ve cured of the itch for change. We live in hope....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes please - as above. ta
The finances are up to you. But based on the pictures alone, yes definitely.
I would love the gmt either in steel and gold or root beer.
Anyone know what type of money those are making
And a comparison
( apologies don’t have the bi-metal GMT)
And an Explorer 2 for another perspective.
Interesting that the YM is 2.5m wider than the GMT given the spec is 2mm and they look to have the same crown (the 0.5mm variance also looks to apply with the YM and ExpII). Also looks like the ExpII crown is 1.2mm shorter than those of the GMT (and YM).
The YM has great proportions, but it does make the Daytona’s look small.
Last edited by joe narvey; 4th October 2020 at 12:59.
Not had the CHNR But it’s on my wanted list, however I had the yacht master and absoloutely loved it completely understated which I actually really liked for a watch of that value and I miss it terribly
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Many thanks! could you do measures 90deg to that? So from lug - lug (across the watch face, not between) - I have heard it is approx 50mm on the WG YM? Just wondering if you can confirm?
Perfect! Many thanks.
Stay away from Watch Talk, Sales Corner and manufacturer websites, at least until you have had your most recent watch for 12 months.
The cycle is unending but can be broken.
You are joking right??
Deleted
Last edited by joe narvey; 4th October 2020 at 13:56.
Nope, have done similar in the past and happy with a 2000s Omega as my decent watch. Look at your purchasing history, there is no such thing as a Perfect Watch, there is always something new. A member called Jussi went through a similar pattern years ago.
Agreed, it's a pointless merry go round.
Cheers,
Neil.
Why though?
Nothing wrong with wanting to own different watches if you actually enjoy . . . watches! I’ve wanted to try some different brands, more so this year after being cooped up for so long. Have bought AP, GS, VC and Omega - all watches I’ve wanted to own for some years. Most of them came and went but who cares? I’ve scratched some so called itches. I’d imagine Martyn has done the same. Plus if you are buying relatively well and can move along at similar pricing, then there’s little or no harm done financially. I’d hazard a guess that he’s enjoyed all of it - the research, the search, the purchase, the ownership and then the sale. One of the great things about our own SC - some watches get enjoyed by many people.
Do I detect an email to the AD along the lines of:
“Remember the deposit I have just paid for a RG YM? Well I have changed my mind. Now I know that the WG YM will fit me a treat, I would like one of those instead please.”😀
Agreed - I flip a lot and sometimes chastise myself for it but then I really enjoy trying lots of different watches. No harm in it if that’s how you want to enjoy the hobby.
Go on Martyn, change it up - the YM is an improvement for me.
I don’t think so. I was interested in the dimensions though to compare. I think the 40-41mm size is ok - 39mm is the ideal for me (from experience) - but important dimension is lug-lug across watch for me.
I’ve an itch that just doesn’t stop. Perhaps I need to change my detergent. Or see my GP.
Have you tried an Oysterflex bracket? They wear very light and I think the watch feels different. If you don’t the bulk you may be surprised by the rubber strap.
Because IMO it can become almost unhealthy obsessional behaviour in the end.
When one itch is scratched another one comes along, even after spending tens of thousands of pounds you are never satisfied. Always looking for the next fix.
I agree that the research and possibly the purchase are quite exciting but IME ownership is always an anti climax, which is why many of these watches end up being flipped.
How can anything live up to the dream?
Cheers,
Neil.
Posting Permissions
