Rolex go to (Supreme) Court

[TF23]

https://www.thefashionlaw.com/swiss-...in-rolex-case/

[Idontgram]

Seems like a reasonable ruling

[watchlovr]

Already affected Artisans de Geneve who now only modify watches for single clients, no additional stock held.

I imagine it’ll burst Bamford etc’s business models too.

[Fullbreakfast]

So instead of just being able to buy a horrific monstrosity from Artisans de Genève, I'll now have to send them one of my own Daytonas to vandalise?

Damn.

[verv]

I think youve had to send in your own watch (or a purchased for the purpose one) for a while.
Personally, I really like some of the ADG offerings, particularly the tropical/shades of blue/Brooklyn challenges. In the metal they're ace.

[Ikincooper]

Seems like a reasonable ruling

Totally agree


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Idontgram]

I think youve had to send in your own watch (or a purchased for the purpose one) for a while.
Personally, I really like some of the ADG offerings, particularly the tropical/shades of blue/Brooklyn challenges. In the metal they're ace.

Yeah, not sure where the hate comes from. I really like ADG’s work. Not all designs are to my taste but I appreciate how they’re able to change things up and still make a coherent product.

[pseunomis]

I agree. There's a big difference between customising something for its owner and selling modified products under the trade mark of the manufacturer of the original product.

Sent from my SM-S908B using Tapatalk

[Dynam0humm]

The arrogance of Rolex IP lawyers never ceases to amaze.