The maxi case was an experiment that didn't work. It could have worked, but it didn't.
Last edited by ColDaspin; 22nd September 2020 at 14:26.
The maxi case was an experiment that didn't work. It could have worked, but it didn't.
Switching between 5 digit and maxi case, the maxi is definitely comparatively uncomfortable and takes about 24h before getting used to it again.
It was not the introduction of the Maxi case for Rolex that suddenly made them irresistible to everyone but rather the arrival of Social media into everyone’s lives. The power of Social media, whether that is influencer or the Kardashians or some talentless wonder behind a keyboard, has allowed Gucci to sell more sneakers, Vuitton to sell more handbags and Rolex to sell more watches.
It could be the social media or could be the Chinese or could be something else, the fact remains Rolex did very well with the maxi case. So, in no way it is not a success. Whatever a small group of narrow minded people, many of whom are incapable of independent thinking and are stuck in the past think. They do not ( fortunately) represent the entire Rolex buying segment of the population. Even if they have delusions of being the most worthy, discerning,
refined, pure etc etc.
Last edited by RAJEN; 22nd September 2020 at 20:14.
In the last 10 years stainless steel sports Rolex models have done well - whatever the model, people were buying into the cache of the bling, that you choose not to acknowledge that is your right.
Reading this thread suggests that Rolex were late to the game with the ''full fat'' obese models and they were lucky that Gok Wan, the Kardashians and other ''influencers'' came along just when they did, for my part I'm pleased that I never bought into the ''emperor's new clothes''.
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."
'Populism, the last refuge of a Tory scoundrel'.
One has to be a special kind of idiot to think that Rolex’s good fortunes in the last decade are down to social media or that social media is exclusive to Rolex. Social media are littered with as many pics of other brands as Rolex. Surely it has played a part in general public’s awareness of luxury goods or stoking their desires to buy and own and flash their luxury goods or what are perceived to be desirable goods. Successful products had their success exemplified by awareness caused by social media but their success was hardly due to social media alone. Otherwise all luxury products would have enjoyed
similar success.
Keep digging Raj.
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."
'Populism, the last refuge of a Tory scoundrel'.
I don't pay Mr Wan, the Kardashians or other 'influencers' any mind at all, in fact I don't think I've ever watched them for more than 10 seconds before flicking the channel or read anything they have said. But why do you think they wear or promote Rolex instead of, say, Bremont or Seiko?
Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.
If Rolex stuck to the maxi case nobody would have batted an eyelid. It is only because Rolex themselves started narrowing the lugs, first with the batgirl and now with the sub, that the maxi case started coming into question.
Last edited by abraxas; 22nd September 2020 at 23:29.
I think Rolex have viewed it as a mistake on their part and clearly prefer to go down the route of larger watches while being more balanced and slimmer contours. Also Rolex will not have wanted to go back to the slimmer pre ceramic case design as it is uncommon for them to look backwards like Tudor with the Black bay so it is clear they do not believe it was the right decision.
No one can question the market success Rolex has acquired but the maxi case did not drive that but as I said in an earlier reply, I feel that the rise of Social media and celebrity lifestyles in everyone’s face 24/7 has driven not just Rolex Sales but many brands within the aspirational luxury goods sector. If Rolex were producing 50mm Subs and the hype said they were the must have no matter how stupid it looked on the wrist, they would have sold out and probably be double RRP in the secondary market
The maxi case was what Rolex had to offer, undoubtedly a level of hype entered into Rolex sales which sparked a need to acquire from the masses and the subsequent sales enjoyed either by AD or the Secondary dealers.
As Rolex now moves away from the Maxi case and I would expect in the near future the maxi dial in the case of the Explorer 11, how the maxi case legacy (if it has one) will be looked upon as the new releases filter into the market, is what many who invested into the Maxi case models are waiting to see. Will the maxi case retain enough interest from buyers to maintain it’s current value status or as the newer models capture the interest and no doubt social media hype, are the old maxi cases seen as a dated “ styling faux pas” that represents a period of excessive size, that appears Rolex was happy to get rid of.
Only time will tell if the maxi becomes a highly prized item or one to be forgotten. In twenty years, maybe Maxi case Rolex , Panerai and 52mm U-boat will be the Iconic for the next generation.
Keen watch fans have long since made up there own minds on maxicases, and as a 'keeper' I imagine it'll be less sought after. I doubt it will lead to much price change though. If supply of the new versions remains restricted then attention falls to what can be found used, and a submariner is still just as popular as ever.
To add to this, for a non watch fanatic, the change is probably barely noticeable.
That is not ‘what the discussion is about’, that’s simply redefining the terms of the discussion to prove you’re right! It is about whether the maxi case was an aesthetic success or an improvement in design terms, in your opinion, and opinions will vary. It seems it’s not the opinion of Rolex themselves that it was an improvement, though it did serve the purpose of making the sub look bigger, until such time as they got around to redesigning the whole watch.
I think it’s reasonable to argue that part of the Rolex design language is a case and bracelet that flow together to some extent, though not as much as with an integrated bracelet, which takes the idea a step further (as did the Oysterquartz and related watches). The shape that this creates is part of their essential design DNA. Personally I found the maxi case less elegant for this reason, though for some who wanted a bigger watch it was a price worth paying. The new model has the best of both worlds, assuming a larger sub is what you actually want.
Of course the maxi case generation sold well, as did a lot of luxury watches, with Rolex inevitably cashing in on being the most recognisable brand, desired both by people who know a lot about watches, and those who know nothing at all. Larger and in many cases blingier watches have served Rolex well in sales terms. Whether that makes them ‘the best’ in design terms is a matter of opinion. Rolex have been gilding the lily for decades, and while the watches have improved technically and are more obviously luxurious, it’s interesting that people will pay a huge premium for older models that haven’t been ‘improved’. It’s similar to music, where the ‘stadium rock’ stage of maximum sales doesn’t always represent the creative peak.
Last edited by Itsguy; 23rd September 2020 at 12:10.
A reasonable post even if I do not agree entirely
The reason for the new design is simply that Rolex needs to constantly make changes to keep on selling more watches. It has gotten enough out of maxi case and the best way to sell another Submariner to a maxi case owner is to offer something different. In a few years, it will be tweaked again. That is the nature of business.
I thought it was called the super case. Maxi refers to maxi dial.
Sorry, been hanging around on TRF too long.
The simple truth is that nearly all of Rolex customers couldn't give a damn about maxi case or any other shape, they bought the watch because it had Rolex written on the dial and they knew it was a good watch.
The maxi case was in short supply and sold well above RRP so calling it a failure is just not sensible. It was a very much wanted watch.
It is only a small minority who get wound up over this sort of thing.
I feel it was a styling error. Does not look good on average or smaller than average wrists. Diameter too small, lug width too small, case too big. An error duly rectified with the new 2020 sub. I predict the maxi case models will not have a glorious future as vintage watches for this reason. But this will obviously take some time given the £20k hulks in the grey market
Give me vintage over new any day (with a very few exceptions). When i first started collecting I liked Bubblebacks, and Sotheby's and Christies used to sell a bunch of them (with a few Daytonas thrown in) - they're virtually unheard of these days.