Last edited by Brighty; 13th September 2020 at 08:14.
One of my daughters had been sent home from school,I believe she’s just got the normal sniffles and cough ,no tell tale COVID symptoms.
She can’t return until she’s been tested,we’ve told our other daughters school and they have said she’s ok to come ,apparently there’s quite a few kids with what we call common cold ,and if they sent them all home the school would be half empty.
Posted the test Saturday morning,not sure how long it’ll be before we get the results.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Someone I know is trying to book a test and and can’t do so on the website. I’ve cycled past the local testing centre quite a few times (maybe 10 miles from where they live) and at the most there are five cars there each time. The staff outnumber the “guests” by about 10:1.
There was a story on the news where someone living in London managed to get a test in London by using a Scottish postcode when going through the website. It could be worth trying some different postcodes?
This is a related story: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53990068
It sounds like priority is given to people in high risk postcodes...
‘World-class’.
R
Ignorance breeds Fear. Fear breeds Hatred. Hatred breeds Ignorance. Break the chain.
Because more people wanting to get a test means a more visible failure of the operation, and because if people stop going for tests it will be become easier to blame them for the rise in cases.
As Trump said, if we did less testing there would be fewer positive results.
But I read cbh's post as "acting this way will effectively put people off getting tested", i.e. without the implication that it was a deliberate ploy. I may of course be wrong as to the intent.
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Sheer incompetence? The system was programmed in a rush. Peter (Griswold) has already shown that clicking alternatively on "drive" and "walk" generated different results each time, and he did this until a testing station was close enough to him.
I think that what you are thus suggesting is beyond their level of expertise. Occam's razor and all that...
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Maybe, maybe not, but interesting how in the early days of testing you'd get a test at one of the closer testing sites to where you live, and now even though testing sites are quiet, tests are being offered hundreds of miles away!
Why should you have to game the system to get a test, unless the system is gaming you in the first place?
Tested at 2pm Sunday, results received 11.30 today, 4 day turnaround, not the promised 48hr max. At least i can go to work tomorrow
Ah, ok, yes be good to get back in. It's been the worst possible week for it. 2 years of work on my project ahead of finally getting parts and doing a prototype build this week, and i'm stuck home trying to watch and direct and give info via a shonky webcam connection. Nightmare. I thought it would be a pain missing Monday, but then 1 day turned into 2, then 3, then 4 waiting for results to tell me what we already knew
Last edited by Brighty; 17th September 2020 at 13:25.
That has been debunked...
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
They are the ones who suggested “World beating”. It is, but not in the way intended. Other countries have issues as well, but nowhere near as bad as here.
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Unintended... Oops. Unattended as well, but still.
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
Having worked in IT for more years than I care to remember my experiences tell me that it is very likely, (nay, probable), that the system wasn't stress tested, (or at least not stress tested fully); and that would indicate why in the early days, i.e. not may user accesses per second, the system would indeed find a site close to the users Post Code location; and why now, with considerably more user accesses per second the system is failing in many, (but not all), cases.
No one in their right mind would design a system to offer distant testing sites to put people off - the risk of that becoming public knowledge would be incomprehensible!
Oh, and I'm now aware of other people who have toggled between Drive Through and Walk Through and have been offered tests close enough to where they live.
Best Regards - Peter
I'd hate to be with you when you're on your own.
Your assertion that the testing websites are directing people halfway across the country in an effort to put people off having tests would be hilarious, if it wasn't for the fact that people like you actually believe it. Do you think they could honestly cover something like that up with the civil service whistle blowers just waiting for an opportunity to phone the Grauniad? As my granny used to say it's more far fetched than sand from China.
Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.
You also have to remember they used Dildo Harding to head the project, she of Talk Talk "The awful truth is that I don't know" hacking fame...
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.