closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Seiko diver production length

  1. #1
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,501

    Seiko diver production length

    Or rather, how to you produce a classic when the models constantly change?

    SKX007 21 years in production
    Monster (first generation ) 13 years
    SBDX001 MM300 15 years

    The 007’s replacement, the SRP777 is still in the catalogue but has limited availability, I assume as the SRPA-E Turtles King Turtles come on stream. Is it being discontinued?

    I can’t keep pace with Seiko’s releases, but I wonder if shorter product cycles even with the upgrades may make these newer watches less iconic going forward.

    Dave


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Grand Master JasonM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    16,156
    I said this to a friend a little while ago, the shear range of similar models recently doesn’t allow any single one to stand out, even though models that are iconic now had short runs, the 6105, 6309, 7548, Less than 10 years each, the difference is those were pretty much the only ones in their range, that’s what made them classics.
    Cheers..
    Jase

  3. #3
    I think a bigger risk is the lack of innovation.

    People go on about Rolex but turn a blind eye to seiko’s iterative design philosophy, captain willards to turtles or 7032 to SKX to new seiko 5s, or perennial variations on the tuna

    The newer 62MAS and MM200 redesigns are also paying homage to another time.

    Sumos, shoguns and samurai seem to have been the only ones to have cut an original design while incorporating the seiko design cues (a minor distinction I realise) but I must say none of those three appeal to me. Maybe they’ll be the underdogs that become future classics to a future generation


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Idontgram View Post
    I think a bigger risk is the lack of innovation.

    People go on about Rolex but turn a blind eye to seiko’s iterative design philosophy...

    Sumos, shoguns and samurai seem to have been the only ones to have cut an original design


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Although I quite like design stability (when it’s right!), the Monster in 2000 was very highly original; I’m not sure they have been that bold since

    D


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by JasonM View Post
    I said this to a friend a little while ago, the shear range of similar models recently doesn’t allow any single one to stand out, even though models that are iconic now had short runs, the 6105, 6309, 7548, Less than 10 years each, the difference is those were pretty much the only ones in their range, that’s what made them classics.
    Agreed, I like a fair few of the new offerings but for the life of me I can't keep up with them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information