Stamping of the 93153 looks very wrong.
Here's a real one:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=694306
I recently bought this bracelet and have concerns over its authenticity. The seller appears to be a serious trader and they insist it’s genuine. I welcome some other opinions.
Stamping of the 93153 looks very wrong.
Here's a real one:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=694306
I'm not an expert but that 95153 stamping looks very crude - as does the STEELINOX.
Doesn't look right to me, stamping looks cheap even compared to a 1972 bracelet I have. Hopefully Haywood will be along with a definitive answer soon!
Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.
The gold links will be the tell tale sign.. try and see if there is any steel showing.. as all of the fakes are wrapped
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The stamping on the clasp is uneven too, something doesn't seem quite right. Could be wrong though.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
I am not an expert but my first reaction is - fake
I have never seen unevenly stamped Rolex no matter the age - the numbers and the steelinox in particular are too messy
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m no expert but just the stamping on the bracket link, those on the clasp and the actual finish on the clasp itself just don’t look right.
Agian no expert but doesnt look right especially the stamping on the 93153, i thought the 3 should be flat topped ?