Because it is a homage, not a copy or reissue.
It is a dive watch.
For those like me who had never heard of it.
Not sure why they didn’t use Mercedes hands if it was a homage.
Nor why they call it black bay as I associate that name with the divers watches?
https://quillandpad.com/2019/04/01/t...t-inspired-it/
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/tu...y-p01-hands-on
https://thewatchlounge.com/tudor-bla...ew-with-price/
Because it is a homage, not a copy or reissue.
It is a dive watch.
Respectfully, a cross between a dive watch and a sailing watch.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
It's different for sure but no likey. Still, I imagine there are plenty who will.
Not keen on the looks of this one at all.
I’ve mellowed on it considerably since the “disappointment” of the Basel reveal. I still don’t want one, nor any real desire to handle one or to further change my mind, but I can certainly see the attraction of it and wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes a sleeper hit.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
For me the P01 is the face of Salma Hayek trapped on the body of Anne Widdecombe.
Dial - lovely, case - just horrid.
D
I love the case, in all the photos it looks so crisp, so sharply made. The character is clear and unmuddled, just straightforwardly itself. Marvellous!
I took the plunge with a bit of trepidation and am very pleased with both it's individuality and surprisingly easy feel on the wrist.
It is different and in a largish collection, for me, that is a good thing as I look forward to seeing it's strange angles when I put it on
As others have said, the dial is superb, let us hope it finds it's way in to a sub release this March!
Watching this to try and wash the image out of my mind.
https://youtu.be/JbB5qc12Uqs
It’s nice to be different. Well... most of the time. Here less so.
Apart from it being fugly as hell; I think most were even further put off by it because many wanted to see the re-release of the Sub.
I went to look at one purely out of curiosity and a drive out. As soon as I tried it on I wanted it.
I would prefer it if the bezel clamps could be removed for a change in looks and to focus more on the lovely dial, but hey ho.
with the original both clamps unlocked so you could clean the bezel as laid down in mil.specs.
n 1967, the US Navy provided Tudor with a set of technical requirements for a new watch. These included:
the need for a better-protected crown;
a bidirectional bezel that is removable for cleaning; and
locked spring bars.
Last edited by bwest76; 25th November 2019 at 13:15.
I like it, apart from the bezel clamps.
And I don't really understand the bezel clamps. It's not a dive bezel, it's a GMT bezel, so why does it need to be securely fixed?
That said, they do look like they would be removable with the strap...
Saw the po1 on saturday and I actually (surprisingly) don’t mind it and dare I say like it. I would not buy one though. It is too big lug to lug for me but building the strap end quite far into the lug does make it snug to the wrist. Sadly it does not make the watch look any smaller.
It’s all brushed which I didn’t realise and is very industrial looking. The winners for me are the strap and the dial. The strap is really lovely and the rubber inner is very well done. The dial is superb, lack of hour plot surrounds really suits the aesthetic of the watch.
Also it’s heavy, very heavy...which is probably why it is not on a Bracelet. Overall it is a bit of a novelty piece for me and maybe a collectors items in years to come but it’s not for me.
I was looking for the answer to that the other day, obviously there’s a reason behind it being a 12 hr bezel. But I thought the idea was, adjust the bezel, lock and dive while referring to the elapsed time.
I think the strap is water resistant (rubber on inside?)
I love the dial. Can only dream/Hope/pray we get a similar ‘Lume applied’ dial on something along the lines of a 5 digit sub next year.
Beckham has an old Tudor snowflake so maybe if we spam him on IG to get onto Tudor...
my links show it was based on a prototype for the USN, so theirs not necessarily a rational for this watch.
Presumably since it was requested for the US Marines they wanted the 12 hour function so that command and operations could be in different time zones and set/measure mission time prior to departure.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Last edited by lughugger; 25th November 2019 at 14:50.
Fat fingered duplication!
You would call this a GMT bezel, but only for a 3 hander. If you had a 4th GMT hand the GMT bezel would need to be to 24hr, but there is no hand here to use a 24 hr scale.
If I am lucky enough to get one, I want it on an oyster bracelet if that is remotely possible
It's out of my price range, but I actually kind of like it, case and all. Looks (to me anyway) like something a naval officer could have worn in the 60's.
It will take a variety of straps and I will be trying an Oyster again soon, needed different springbars for that.
Here is mine on a Tropic
And an idea of how it would look on an Oyster, just overlaid here for now.
What size strap does this take?
Cheers,
Ben
..... for I have become the Jedi of flippers
" an extravagance is anything you buy that is of no earthly use to your wife "
Just a quick update for any P01 fans, assuming there are any
My P01 Commando has now gone "Full Metal Jacket" for a trial period.
Looks great on the bracelet - very smart...
I’m a big fan of Tudor, and still own a couple, and I’d like to always try and say something nice but I am really struggling with this watch.
It’s a shocker on all levels to my eye.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+1 interested in trying mine on a bracelet
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Or Dogma...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMcTicx-63Y