Originally Posted by
Itsguy
Sorry RAJEN, I don't agree. The watches we're discussing here try hard to hide their thickness, but it can literally lift the case off the wrist, leaving a gap that wan't there on the original Grand Seiko of the 60s. It simply isn't the intention of the design language, it's a unintended problem. It's caused by movements, rotors and display backs that are too thick. Omega had the same problem with the older Aqua Terras, such as the top heavy Skyfall. They've now solved this, and they did that because they know perfectly well that the issue wasn't the wearer or their taste, it was the watch. I know you love to defend the honour of large watch wearers at any opportunity, and that's fine, but this isn't about a preference for large thick watches or smaller ones, it's about a design that could do with improving.