As was the case with several well connected women of the period, Rossetti for example, Ada didn’t encounter as much headwind as most women and having married well, as they say, encountered still less. However, this doesn’t undermine her singular abilities. Have you bumped into the play Arcadia as this explores a situation much like hers and is well worth the read and indeed watching when it is next staged.
comparisons with Turing can get rapidly misleading if only because he had access to logic after Russell and Frege had tidied it up into a universal tool capable of underpinning the Church Turing thesis and thus functional accounts of universality. Personally I think her vision of AI was more compelling than his as she seemed to grasp the importance of being able to do things that required intelligence if done by humans while Turing seemed to get stuck on ersatz selves - a mistake that hung round the neck of GOFAI until Rumelhart and Mclelland. It’s hard to know how good she’d have been as she never got the chance to get into a dialectic relationship with a functioning Turing machine. I suspect she’d have exploded with creativity, but we will never know.