closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: Review of Rolex Yacht-Master ref.16622

  1. #1
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207

    Review of Rolex Yacht-Master ref.16622

    I borrowed one from a friend, photographed it and wrote a quick review. I hope you like it.

    LINK TO THE REVIEW

    Last edited by JPE; 22nd September 2019 at 20:18.

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    7,769
    Hi JPE

    What a brilliant review, it answers all the question in a nice succint manner.

    You have actually got me foaming at the mouth here. I have never ever considered a Yacht Master but right now I certainly want to buy one, very understated but also very classy.

    I will definately look into this.

  3. #3
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks Mick.

    Yes it's a beautiful watch in the flesh. Very shiny and expensive looking. Like I said it'd be a perfect watch for someone who wants a little bit of bling but shy away from 18K gold.

    I was really impressed with the watch.

  4. #4
    Grand Master oldoakknives's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    20,135
    Blog Entries
    1
    Nice one, thanks.
    Started out with nothing. Still have most of it left.

  5. #5
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Glasgow(ish)
    Posts
    334
    Another great review. The YM has to be one of the most underrated Rolex models.

  6. #6
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Benji053 View Post
    Another great review. The YM has to be one of the most underrated Rolex models.
    Thanks.

    Yeah but the price might have something to do with its popularity too. When this Rolesium version was new it was more expensive than a Daytona.

    That 42mm version with a rubber strap leaves me cold though. It's hard to find anything desirable with that model. But maybe it's nicer in the flesh too?


  7. #7
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Glasgow(ish)
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by JPE View Post
    Thanks.

    Yeah but the price might have something to do with its popularity too. When this Rolesium version was new it was more expensive than a Daytona.

    That 42mm version with a rubber strap leaves me cold though. It's hard to find anything desirable with that model. But maybe it's nicer in the flesh too?

    I got to try one of these recently, clumsy big.

    The blue dial 40mm YM is the sweet spot - and available for less than RRP which is a bonus.

  8. #8
    Another great review, thank you.

    Hopefully you'll be able to get your hands on a few more watches and keep them coming :)

  9. #9
    Craftsman NCC66's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    709
    As others have said, great review.

    I’ve literally just tried on a 37mm steel and platinum one this afternoon. I was passing the local AD and spotted what appeared to be a very attractive watch in the window. Never even looked at the YM as a serious proposition before. A friend has the 44mm steel and Everose version, which distinctly turns me off. Looks fine on him but way too big and bling for me.

    However, I’ve been blown away with the 37mm I tried on. Genuinely stunning on my small wrist. Just shiny enough, just big enough, just lovely! That’s another one to add to the wish list....


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    england
    Posts
    1,595
    Enjoyed the read.

    YM does nothing for me though, see it as arguably the worst watch Rolex make.

  11. #11
    Master de30m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    1,069
    Always liked the 116622BLSO

    Just the right side of bling and not seen too often

  12. #12
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks, all.

    @Ivan Drago: I agree that some YM models aren't that great. I'm not a big fan of the TT versions, either... and YM2 is a great watch but I find the design very unattractive.

    But the Rolesium versions grey and blue are pretty good. Try them on wrist and you'll see.

  13. #13
    Master shalako's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    4,489
    Great review, about time this lovely watch got some attention, always under rated and surprisingly still not a popular model even though it’s been discontinued for a few years now. I’ve owned one for a while and the dial is sublime, it sparkles like a sea of diamonds and really comes to life - just like the Platinum bezel when caught in the right lighting.
    I don’t think any of the latest YM models can match it IMHO.


  14. #14
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    7,995

    16622

    I bought my 16622 new 5 years ago. Could have had the 116622, but prefer the more elegant lugs and slimmer clasp of the 5-digit.

    The combination of steel case & bracelet, white gold hands and platinum dial & bezel is wonderful, especially in sunlight, when the frosted platinum changes colour.

    The more you wear it, the cleverer you realise the design is.

    The best images are Jocke's:
    http://www.watchwallpapers.com/16622.htm
    Last edited by Tinker; 24th September 2019 at 01:01.

  15. #15
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Washington , England
    Posts
    550
    I’ve got the Rhodium dial version , to me the best of them all.

    Only waited a week for it as well ....

  16. #16
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by shalako View Post
    Great review, about time this lovely watch got some attention, always under rated and surprisingly still not a popular model even though it’s been discontinued for a few years now.
    Thanks man. Much appreciated.

    But it was this Rolesium version which brought YM to the spotlight in the first place. Before that YM didn't really have a real identity in the lineup (as I wrote in the review). And like I said the price was very high... more than a SS Daytona back in the day. That must have been a big factor too.

    But I agree... not many reviews of this model. I wasn't a big fan, either... but after having this in my possession for a day I changed my mind. This watch has to be witnessed in the flesh.

  17. #17
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
    I bought my 16622 new 5 years ago. Could have had the 116622, but prefer the more elegant lugs and slimmer clasp of the 5-digit.

    The combination of steel case & bracelet, white gold hands and platinum dial & bezel is wonderful, especially in sunlight, when the frosted platinum changes colour.

    The more you wear it, the cleverer you realise the design is.

    The best images are Jocke's:
    http://www.watchwallpapers.com/16622.htm
    Here Jocke takes off the bezel and examines it closely. If I did something like this I'd definitely destroy the watch, haha.
    http://www.watchwallpapers.com/plat.htm

  18. #18
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Co Durham
    Posts
    87
    I had one of these for a couple of years and it was a great watch, worked on a day to day and still looked smart when needed. It was missed for sometime after trading...

    Great review and a big blast of nostalgia.



    ISCB

    Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk

  19. #19
    I’ve been lucky enough to own a few of them in the past and think they’re still undervalued


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    1,279
    I enjoyed that review, thank you. The yacht master is a watch I had entirely overlooked, dismissing it as a silly expensive version of the sub as per the review. After reading that and looking at the great photos I too find I could change my mind for that steel and platinum version. I could see myself in the hunt for a white dialed dressier watch in the future and I'd have to put this on the short list now I think! Thanks.

  21. #21
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks, all.

    However I'm not sure if it has been "completely overlooked". The Rolesium version 16622 was pretty solid seller I think. A lot of them available in the second hand market.

  22. #22
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    London
    Posts
    341
    Fantastic review thank you!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  23. #23
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    504
    Great review not sure how it doesn’t get the credit it deserves


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  24. #24
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy4389 View Post
    Great review not sure how it doesn’t get the credit it deserves

    Yeah I also think it DOES get the credit it deserves. Rolesium was a solid seller.

    Of course YM will never sell as much as the Submariner but it's not even realistic to except that kind of figures. Especially when the retail prices are so high. Second hand prices at Chrono24 seem to be pretty much on par with Sub and SD though.

  25. #25
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Someone told me recently that YM looks like a 90'S "fashion watch" and that's why he didn't like it.

    What do you think? A fair statement?

  26. #26
    Well I love mine and wear it often :)


  27. #27
    Master shalako's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by JPE View Post
    Someone told me recently that YM looks like a 90'S "fashion watch" and that's why he didn't like it.

    What do you think? A fair statement?
    I’m crushed that a random person said that to you, better sell mine immediately.

  28. #28
    Grand Master Der Amf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,977
    "Deriding something for being a fashion watch is a very fashionable choice for one's first step in watch criticism, isn't it? Very 'on point'. Well done. Nice GMT, by the way."

  29. #29
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by shalako View Post
    I’m crushed that a random person said that to you, better sell mine immediately.
    No, I was just curious why he said that. Does YM have some special characteristics of the 90's "fashion watches"? I don't even know how the 90's fashion watches look like. Swatch was a fashion watch but that was the 80's.

  30. #30
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Der Amf View Post
    "Deriding something for being a fashion watch is a very fashionable choice for one's first step in watch criticism, isn't it? Very 'on point'. Well done. Nice GMT, by the way."
    Thanks man. :)

  31. #31
    Master JPE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,207
    Interesting article on the Yacht-Master prototype. It was originally developed because Daytona was such a slow seller.

    https://www.pomelowatches.com/featur...ster-prototype


  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    1,279
    daytona slow seller? they should make more!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information