Originally Posted by
Itsguy
I have a ‘67 GS and it’s a beauty, there’s something really appealing about the early GS designs. It’s very accurate and the movement seems solid and robust. I’m not sure how to back that up, perhaps someone more knowledgeable could advise, but it gives the impression of being solidly designed and dependable, as with my other 60s Seiko (it’s not a Hi-beat so the lower rate may help).
However mine has been re-dialed, presumably due to discolouration of the original dial. It’s hard to find examples that have been serviced regularly or at all in the way you easily can with vintage Rolex. This may be due to the (alleged) Japanese tendency to prefer buying something new to fixing something old, or to a lack of a strong manufacturer service network during the years before the GS re-launch.
Whatever the cause, there are a great many examples on Japanese auction sites with heavy patination, water damage, scratched hands and so on. It’s also difficult to know what you are buying from photos in Japanese auctions, and obviously harder to return things if there are problems. Nonetheless, it’s worth persevering as they are hugely appealing and wearable. There’s undoubtedly a halo effect into KS which is pushing up prices, but not to crazy levels. And there’s always the option of looking at other more affordable 60s Seikos which at their best really aren’t that far off. I’ve been wearing my Skyliner all week, which is just as accurate and to my eye as well designed.