These took my breath away,I can’t make my mind up which I like the best.
Forget the value,it’s the sheer engineering,skill and beauty that grabs me.
Although the 5196 looks great in many ways, a tiny movement with a spacer, covered up by a solid caseback would really turn me off. Lange Saxonia 35mm for me, or Vacheron Traditionelle, although that is maybe a little large at 38mm.
The thing I struggle with, is that the mechanical basis of any of these watches is quite straight-forward; millions of manual wind watches have been made to a similar recipe. What makes these so expensive is the finesse and finishing, or the jewellery dimension. I think companies like Patek and Lange are really about complications.
So to be controversial, a basic mechanical thing with a lot of high end finsihing, and not necessarily representative of what the companies can do mechanically. Actually a big part of me does want the ALS and Vacheron I referred to, jewellery or not.
Dave
I am no expert,but surely the skill is in making them so thin yet accurate and reliable.
The finish is the icing on the cake?
I had to google
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/pi...pt-introducing
I have always liked dress watches, and each of these is stunning.
In the 1950s, everyone regarded the thinness of a watch as a sign of quality. The chunky 39mm Rolex Explorer, that I am wearing today, would have looked cheap and would have attracted comments such as - was that thing made by a blacksmith.
One day thinness will come back into fashion and all of our chunky Rolex will be as attractive as 1970s flares.
In general PP designs leave me cold but this iteration of the Calatrava is, imo, close to perfection.
That is nice,how deep?