That rings a bell. Wasn't it determined to be a MWC shill site.
I came across this by accident.
http://www.military-watches.net/Home_Page.html
That rings a bell. Wasn't it determined to be a MWC shill site.
No need to apologise and I don't doubt that there is some useful info there.
However... A few years ago there was controversy around MWC and their allegedly false claims about military provenance/connections for their watches. I do know for sure that MWC put markings on the back of some of their G10-alike watches (I had one) that made them *look* as if they had CWC/Precista G10-style military issue markings but were in fact nothing of the sort. There was nothing terribly wrong with the watch but I disliked the attempt to make it seem that it was something that it was not.
I vaguely seem to recall that the site you linked to appeared around that time and gave the impression of being an attempt to appear as if it was an objective site comparing MWC and CWC when in fact it turned out to be backed and created by a pro-MWC connection. Maybe. I make no accusations or claims. I am simply remembering how things seemed to work out at the time.