That's quite a dilemma. Both v appealing. I'd keep em both. But gun to my head, the Seiko would go. Its height just makes it less versatile.
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
I only have two, a seiko mm300 sbdx 017 and Tudor Harrods black bay. I don’t wear divers that much and it’s time to let one go. If you could only keep one what would you choose?
That's quite a dilemma. Both v appealing. I'd keep em both. But gun to my head, the Seiko would go. Its height just makes it less versatile.
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
The MM300
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I would shift the Harrods Black Bay. The MM300 is a fantastic watch.
Neither my favourites sell the pair, buy a nice Omega SMP, much more wearable IMHO
Ditch the Tudor.
Or sell both and get the SLA021 which is the new SBDX017 with sapphire crystal and ceramic bezel.
Although both divers very different watches. I like both but probably wouldn't buy either, but only because there are plenty I prefer at that price range. You probably know deep down which one is the keeper but still a tough choice!
Enough waffle, which one do you wear the most? I find that's the only way to choose sometimes.
Like others, I would ditch the Tudor, probably an easy sell as well.
I'd keep the Harrods Black Bay
Ditch the Tudor.
Given that you've only worn the Tudor once, I'd ditch that.
However I guess it depends which you wear and like, if neither then maybe consider selling both?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using TZ-UK mobile app
If you do not need any money sell both and consolidate to something new :)
I wasn’t a fan if the sea master, however the new ceramic dialled variants are rather eye catching.