Because they need all those ADs to flog thousands of DJs.
As a new member to the forum, it has not taken long to realise that the availability of some SS models is a really contentious issue.
I have been thinking and the whole issue seems pretty easy to resolve if they really wanted to. Why don’t Rolex just cut out the middle man (AD) and sell direct to customers?
Yes there would still be a waiting list, but it could be an official one and at least you would know you were actually on it.
Benefits of the above:
Rolex gaining the extra 20-30% mark up, they also have complete line of sight of supply v demand and finally it removes the sour taste attached to the brand currently (for some)
Any thoughts on this happening in the future?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because they need all those ADs to flog thousands of DJs.
Too sensible.
You're making the big assumption that Rolex think there's a problem. I think they're quite happy with things as they are.
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
You can buy watches directly from Omega now and with the contraction of the AD dealer network towards more Rolex boutiques it's not a massive leap for this to happen. It would be an interesting development...
In the latest Bark & Jack video he discusses all things Rolex following attendance at an event with senior Rolex members. In short Rolex ave no intention of selling direct.
Selling direct makes a premium brand akin to that of a vacuum cleaner sold by Amazon.
I suspect Rolex will slowly rack up prices and make the ADs even more upmarket.
Rolex now know that customers are prepared to pay well above RRP so they may as well exploit it.
I was in Mappin and Webb yesterday and their large Rolex area was a sad place. Twenty feet of window and not a casual glance from the passing multitudes, all two tone women’s watches pretty much. I chatted to the manger and he said he gets a steel Pepsi GMT every three months. They had not a single sports watch on view inside either. They haven’t routinely displayed steel sports watches for three or four years.
I walked up to an Omega boutique and there were several window shoppers. Inside there was an interesting selection of watches, dress, precious and steel. Two customers were sat down paying.
There’s no quick answer, Rolex can’t just speed up the production line but how long until there is a generation that’s never seen a sports Rolex in a shop window to lust over, and presumably will then never come to want one?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Rolex should be more like Christopher Ward
The local AD is spending £150k ‘upgrading’ their secure room to a Rolex only concession. All other brands including Tudor will be in the public ‘lobby’ and jewellery over the road in a new store. They have an SS sports model every 3-12 months depending on what you’re after, plenty of OPs, DJ’s and Cellinis.
Guess they’re confident Rolex won’t be going e-channel anytime soon.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Stuck my nose in a few dealers while walking round central London today. Plenty of DJ/OP but all in TT/PM with stones. They currently have nothing to offer you unless you are a) female and looking for a jewellery piece, or b) a member of 50 Cent's entourage.
It's rather sad really.
So what!
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."
'Populism, the last refuge of a Tory scoundrel'.
Rolex should be grateful for all the free advice from everyone who thinks they know how to run their business better than Rolex themselves. Particularly the ones who don’t have a Rolex or don’t have an interest in buying one (or so they say).
Yet second hand dealers are awash with every model.
And many ‘enthusiasts’ have one at home, unworn except for in the house.....ready for sale.
Rolex make a million watches a year give or take. Rare at RRP only.
Meh. Giving consideration of getting rid my blnr and actually getting something a little rare.
Get a good fake. That will teach 'em. It's the only language they understand.
Pushing a brand image upwards is often a long and slow process and cannot be rushed.
PP currently lead the field and Rolex want to be the number two snapping at their heels. This means upgrading outlets and having to resist the temptation over making stock over available. If the present shortages continue for a couple more years, the exclusivity alone will rack the demand and prices up. All premium brands have a waiting list and that is a something all but the very wealthiest and powerful have to live with.
This is something WIS's are going to have to live with and the days of going in, snapping your fingers and demanding a discount are long gone.
Rolex want the same image as PP and good luck to them, and so far, they are making a good job of it.
"I say, fetch me a pretty Rolex my good man!"
I love this rarity point, it is made by many. Rolex have never said they are rare. Prestigious, aspirational, yes even exclusive, but not rare.
Annual production is around 800,000 from movements submitted for COSC testing (these are public records), compare to Patek Philippe for example, as of a 2017 article, it stated that Patek haven't reached 1,000,000 units in their entire existence! Plus PP was a "pensioner" even before R was "born"
I don't like the thought of online sales from Rolex. Fedex chucking a parcel over the garden fence is not really an "experience" worthy of the brand.
I do however think Rolex could get involved more than they do in terms of allocation.
Why not introduce a process where you place an order direct with Rolex, and state your preferred AD for delivery.
When the watch arrives you get the call - turn it down, you lose your deposit & it goes in the display case.
Interestingly I was chatting to a sales person in Goldsmiths that was telling me that Leeds were losing one of their ADs as Rolex didn't want multiple in the city and they were hoping that meant their allocation would increase as a result. So I might see that DSSD before I'm dead after all
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure of this has been posted but worth a look. Bark and Jack with alleged info on all of the above:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGb3VXTzLrw&t=482s
Rolex can never be PP nor is it their aspiration.
The current Rolex tag line is - You never own a Rolex. You only flip it for a profit.
Unless ofcourse, you are Mick P.:-)
Rolex learned from the BMW school of marketing. Which I admire as it is very difficult to do, and you need a product that stands up to scrutiny as the backbone of the campaign.
For example, a few years back, in the UK the BMW3 was more common than the Ford Mondeo (still is AFAIK) but way more desirable and aspirational.
Rolex are using a similar marketing model at present, "common as muck" but still "everybody" either wants one or as least knows that Rolex are a high-end brand.
It's genius, large quantities produced, yet still desirable.
How do you know the aspirations of the Rolex board. They run an excellent business model and are successfully re-imaging their brand and discounting is now almost a memory. Things appear to be looking up. PP will always be number 1 because of the history and cache but Rolex are certainly in the early stages of biting at their heels.
As regards to flipping, I suspect that only a few indecisive WIS's do that. Most Rolex owners probably keep them for years. TZ-UK members are not your typical wearer.
‘’Re-imaging the brand.’ Quite the opposite. What they have done is respond to the emerging new middle-classes by blinging-up the range. Making many models more vulgar and mildly tasteless . I don’t blame them, that’s where their growth is. But it’s ploddingly predictable and utterly lacking in imagination or creativity. That’s not what they do these days.
I admire Rolex because they brilliantly tap into the aspirations of the average middle income consumer, (like me) They wouldn’t want to be Patek, they want to sell a million watches a year. They’re Waitrose, not Harrods.
And slowly, they will increase production capacity.
Last edited by paskinner; 25th June 2019 at 12:40.