closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A purchase / service question

  1. #1
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,514

    A purchase / service question

    I’m thinking of buying a watch from a Chrono24 private seller that is from 2011. It is an ETA 2895, hasn’t been serviced yet, but is little used. The seller tells me 100 days use, which I believe. On this basis, there won’t be much physical wear. I normally plan to service watches worn in my rotation about every 7-8 years, so normally this watch would be due a service now.

    My question is, if lightly used, can I defer service for maybe 3-4 years, or will lubricant degradation make this in need of service regardless

    I would be grateful for the collective advice

    Thanks

    Dave


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Master Elwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    1,155
    The lubricant will still have aged. With little use it's also not moved very much. My inclination would be to get it service.

    I've been in a similar situation. In 2010 I bought a 2002 Rolex that had not had a service. I wore the watch for 3 months to make sure it was right for me & then sent it off for a service. I felt at that point it became mine.

    It's current back at Rolex for it's second service almost 9 years on.
    Last edited by Elwood; 13th June 2019 at 13:48. Reason: To make mi riting well good

  3. #3
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,514
    I’ve no objection to servicing at all, although I have a vintage watch being serviced now, and I could do without another early service bill. I would regard “good for 3-4 years” as most acceptable!

    Dave


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Sussex, UK
    Posts
    5,128
    The Watch is eight years old. We can’t really know how it’s been treated, or what state the mechanism is in. It’s just guesswork.
    Common sense points to a service.

  5. #5
    Master Elwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    W Sussex
    Posts
    1,155
    Quote Originally Posted by helidoc View Post
    I’ve no objection to servicing at all, although I have a vintage watch being serviced now, and I could do without another early service bill. I would regard “good for 3-4 years” as most acceptable!

    Dave
    If you factored in the cost of a service and added half of that to your budget, could you buy a newer one or a more recently serviced one?

  6. #6
    Master helidoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,514
    Quote Originally Posted by Elwood View Post
    If you factored in the cost of a service and added half of that to your budget, could you buy a newer one or a more recently serviced one?
    No, I don’t think so

    Pricing is very consistent, but condition is much better than most, and more importantly it has the right dial colour. I think all the alternatives are in a similar position regarding service.

    I’m almost at the point of committing. My pause is because a recent Chrono24 acquisition, that was over 60 years old really did need a service! I suspect I could get a small reduction, based on a service need

    D


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information