Reply With QuoteIt must be because the driver couldn’t be identified, so they couldn’t exactly throw her license at her?
It must be because the driver couldn’t be identified, so they couldn’t exactly throw her license at her?
So if I go out get pissed jump in the back because the mystery “ driver” ran off wouldn’t work around here.
Paul.
I bet her insurance quote will be "interesting".
Isn’t there an offence of ‘failure to identify the driver’ or somesuch they could have charged her with too?
Cheers..
Jase
Sooner or later they will split up and one will allege the other was driving and then it becomes perjury and custodial for one of them.
Sent from my iPhone using TZ-UK mobile app
Isn't there an offence for spraying a Range Rover pink? That's what I want to know.Originally Posted by JasonM
Last edited by WillHarris2306; 25th February 2019 at 21:18.
Looks like she was done for drunk in charge as opposed to drink driving.
There is...link...but I think they went with Excess Alcohol (in charge)...the latter having the greater penalty.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Cheers..
Jase
How does her having to pay a victim surcharge work? Who was the victim?
I want to know what is a "pornstar martini"?!
R
Ignorance breeds Fear. Fear breeds Hatred. Hatred breeds Ignorance. Break the chain.
Maybe it was the hedge?
Or try this...What is the victim surcharge?
Us, for having to see her once again splashed disgracefully all over the news media.
Don't be coming in here and spoiling a good moan with facts!
Posting Permissions