And indeed my point! Not trying to rock the boat, but I often hear challenges against this opinion.
For me, it's most about what the income for these watches funds (i.e. unethical businesses, money laundering, terrorism etc).
That's the main reason I won't buy one, but the perception I see in many areas is "well I've got a real one, so no one is allowed to have a fake" (tongue in cheek, not directed at anyone - playing devil's advocate).
Unless you are a huge spender with your AD, I would have thought that 3-4 years wait for a 126710BLRO is a pipe dream. Said it before but I was in my AD the morning the model was announced and the sales assistant had a desktop full of bits of paper with names and numbers of people after one. I hope I am wrong in your case.
I don't think replicas harm the likes of Rolex one jot. In fact it's print a sign of increasing allure of the real thing. As stated no one in their right mind is looking at purchasing a Rolex then gets frustrated and goes for a knock off. Replicas hurt brands lower in the food chain at a similar price point. I have no wish to be disparaging if those who buy them, many don't understand why mechanical watches cost so much. It's up to them if they wish to spent their money on a product that won't last them a month rather than go for an affordable brand.
I understand some replicas might have ETAs inside them. I'd be interested in knowing if they would be viewed differently of they had a different company's name on the ie more of an homage??
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Jumpingjalapeno; 21st January 2019 at 22:54.
Thanks David. I'm certain you are correct. I'm not a prolific spender with any particular AD unfortunately. I totally understand that this choke on supply by Rolex strengthens their brand, 'exclusivity' & values etc (whether I fully agree with it is a different matter - but that might sound like sour grapes because I can't get one! ). The bit that I don't understand is how AD's in smallish UK towns with already struggling high streets (where my AD is) can be comfortable with this when they must rely on pretty much every sale & regularity for turnover in order to keep going in a financially efficient way.
Maybe I'm totally missing something or their margins on each unit are huge and it really doesn't affect them.
For Rolex, the AD's margin is 37%. For other makes it is 40-50%.
I suspect replicas have replica ETA movements inside them rather than the real thing. They might say genuine swiss eta movement, but they're already in the business of ripping people off so what does one extra fib matter?
http://watchguy.co.uk/comparison-sea...eacock-sl3000/
Small AD's only get a handful of the desirable steel sports models. In recent times the AD's themselves are putting the desirable models on the gray market, in order to benefit by the gray market margins... and only sell a small number (over the counter) at list, to valued customers. It is a mess. Only play, if you want to get played.
All the fuss is over a small number of watches in the Rolex range, to so-called 'desirable' sports watches. My understanding is that getting hold of the rest of the range isn`t difficult, and that's where the ADs do the bulk of their sales.
The world needs to forget about Rolex sports watches, the supply/demand situation's become self-perpetuating......demand increases because folks want what they can`t easily get.
Last edited by walkerwek1958; 22nd January 2019 at 17:02.
If your intention was really to do something to remove replica watches from the world, the first thing to do is not post links to where people can buy them.
Although, admittedly, maybe a link to a (probably) scam website will discourage people, too. I don't know what you're thinking.
Most replica 'discussions' on here end up in dispute which is counterproductive. I don't know about other makes but it would seem to me that Rolex have acknowledged the threat by incorporating features like the tiny laser engraved crown on the glass.
This may be a bit contentious and in all likelihood, utter bollocks, but what if the manufacturers don't actually give a flying fudge about fakes? Is it possible that the proliferation of fake watches actually encourages people to go to their local AD and buy a brand new watch rather than risking their money on a second hand watch thereby increasing profits? Tinfoil hat stuff indeed but I've always wondered why the major brands aren't part of something like the VERO program on eBay. Surely it wouldn't be a big hit on their profit margins to employ one or two guys to trawl eBay/etc and get all the obvious fakes removed. Christ, even Eddie gets fake Precistas removed - why not Swatch/Rolex/LVMH etc?
We're through the looking glass here people...
How would a Swiss watch company go about stopping fakes being made in China? Respect for intellectual property is .....still at a nascent stage there. I doubt it matters whether they're furious or unfussed, ultimately they're powerless to stop them being made.
That's very true, but its not as though people have to go to China to buy them! I read on here that Swiss authorities take a very hard line on fake (Swiss) watches, whilst in the UK, its a good old British fudge - owning a fake isn't illegal, but in so far as trademarks are infringed, its illegal to sell them (though its obviously fraud to represent your fakes as real). Trading Standards do occasional seizures, but with spending cuts there are hardly any staff or resources for this these days.
I belive that cooyright laws do not exsit in china
But would you really want to give these people your credit card details
It is quite simple don't buy from "chinanoobwatch" then you have done something.
How good or poor they are doesn't affect any genuine watches.