closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 44 of 44

Thread: SIHH 2019: IWC Spitfire Collection

  1. #1

    SIHH 2019: IWC Spitfire Collection

    IWC's focus this year is the Spitfire - except it's not really the classic Spitfire of years long gone with their silvery dials but with bronze (and steel) and different colour dials treatments. The other big difference with the normal Pilot range is a full set of in-house movements for all the watches.

    And I have to say, I really like them. For starters the 3 hander - the dates are all aligned correctly and it all looks rather good. The chrono as well is nicely balanced and at 41mm looks far better balanced.

    I'm excited to see them in the metal actually.

    All on the 'dinkee - https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/iw...on-introducing




  2. #2
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    838
    Looks really good the chrono.. getting a bit fed up of pilot three handers.. much of a muchness to me these days.. too many making them..
    Dont get me wrong as I like the simplicity and function.. but theres just so many of them


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Great to see the UTC back, I like them all but not a fan of the red ‘spitfire’ think they would look better without it but I’m sure they will sell well.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Frantastic View Post
    Looks really good the chrono.. getting a bit fed up of pilot three handers.. much of a muchness to me these days.. too many making them..
    Dont get me wrong as I like the simplicity and function.. but theres just so many of them


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I kind of agree - I think the key thing with this 3 hander is that the date is aligned properly due to the in-house movement, not the useless effort we have seen on the latest 'Mark'.

    Agree on the chrono. Also I am a fan of the UTC -


  5. #5
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down south jukin
    Posts
    5,257
    Blog Entries
    1
    Red spitfire doesn’twork for me, as for date window mine is is fine.

  6. #6
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    south
    Posts
    451
    Doesnt work for me either red and green shouldn't be seen

  7. #7
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    726
    The basic ones look a bit dull, the chronograph looks good .I also like the new top gun black ceramic chronograph though it's a big beast .

    Sent from my Moto G (4) using TZ-UK mobile app

  8. #8
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    68
    I still can't forgive IWC for what they did to the Ingenieur line. But these new Pilots do look good. Hopefully they'll fix the Ingenieur soon.

  9. #9
    I'm not convinced. There are a lot of different colours on that dial - green, white, aged lume cream, red. Bit of a muddle, IMO. Again, nice to the UTC, but bronze, with a green dial? The bronze takes the colour count to five (six, if you include the brown of the strap.)

    Also, the UTC is a 50% premium over the bronze chronograph? How did they come up with these prices? Is it just a cynical application of what they think the market will support?

    No thank you. I prefer to think that IWC produced no new watches past about 2005 or so.

  10. #10
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    1,459
    Definitely a fan of the black dial chrono version, looks very vintage.

  11. #11
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bath, UK
    Posts
    1,289
    I think they look great, and may be tempted in the future. But I sort of wish the “spitfire” brand was just placed on the caseback rather than the dial.

  12. #12
    Master sweets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol - UK
    Posts
    6,056
    Hmmm, not for me.
    I will leave aside the obvious silliness of naming a watch collection Spitfire when it is fitted with B-Uhr hands. This would have been a great opportunity to re-introduce proper Mark hands.
    But the dial is a very simple printed one without applied indices, and it really looks like there aren't any concentric rings inside the sub-dials. I know this is in keeping with the past, but it really reduces the appearance of value on the watch. The green? Well. it is nice and dark, but a bit meh, as it does very little. And the red spitfire is an odd choice on a range of watches that have traditionally been of only one colour.
    The new movements are progress, but that is only a catch-up, IWC have been the largest big brand player left using largely ETA Ebauches for far too long.
    D

  13. #13
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    London
    Posts
    76
    Love the simple 39mm bronze version!

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using TZ-UK mobile app

  14. #14
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,178
    These are the ones I'm interested in. Standard black dial, so the red works well, reduced by 1mm and 2mm respectively (hopefully lug length down proportionally also).

    That three hander on a NATO is all the watch you'd ever need. Though the faux lume on hands and quadrant is a bug bear, but now that they're in house movements rather than the old Sellita bases, I'm not put off by the value so much any more.


  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by tcy148 View Post
    I still can't forgive IWC for what they did to the Ingenieur line. But these new Pilots do look good. Hopefully they'll fix the Ingenieur soon.
    I agree it was a tragedy what they did with the Inge - thankfully I have an older more true version. Maybe in a few years they see the error in their ways.

    Quote Originally Posted by Qatar-wol View Post
    I'm not convinced. There are a lot of different colours on that dial - green, white, aged lume cream, red. Bit of a muddle, IMO. Again, nice to the UTC, but bronze, with a green dial? The bronze takes the colour count to five (six, if you include the brown of the strap.)

    Also, the UTC is a 50% premium over the bronze chronograph? How did they come up with these prices? Is it just a cynical application of what they think the market will support?

    No thank you. I prefer to think that IWC produced no new watches past about 2005 or so.
    The UTC is apparently a limited edition, that may explain why.

    As for the Spitfire red - I have read somewhere this is only for the prototype and it will be removed on the final watches.

    Quote Originally Posted by sweets View Post
    Hmmm, not for me.
    I will leave aside the obvious silliness of naming a watch collection Spitfire when it is fitted with B-Uhr hands. This would have been a great opportunity to re-introduce proper Mark hands.
    But the dial is a very simple printed one without applied indices, and it really looks like there aren't any concentric rings inside the sub-dials. I know this is in keeping with the past, but it really reduces the appearance of value on the watch. The green? Well. it is nice and dark, but a bit meh, as it does very little. And the red spitfire is an odd choice on a range of watches that have traditionally been of only one colour.
    The new movements are progress, but that is only a catch-up, IWC have been the largest big brand player left using largely ETA Ebauches for far too long.
    D
    I think the Mark hands will be re-introduced next year or year after - with an updated pilot range with this new movement.

    IWC are playing catchup - clearly some management missteps. Maybe this is the beginning of the turn?

    As mentioned above, the red Spitfire is likely to be removed for the final watches. Let's see.

    Anyway, I kinda like them - the bronze cases especially seem better than most - maybe because they are already darkened a bit(?) But I want to see how they look in the flesh

  16. #16
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down south jukin
    Posts
    5,257
    Blog Entries
    1
    I think they got it right with mine I wouldn’t swap it.



  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by bwest76 View Post
    I think they got it right with mine I wouldn’t swap it.

    Which exact watch is this one? And do you have a face-on view.....I know you mentioned that the date alignment seems fine to you, but I do fine the mark xviii date placement a bit jarring and slightly too in on the dial.

    Thanks.

  18. #18
    Looks like the tribute to Mk11, the one I just posted a WTB for!

  19. #19
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyp View Post
    As for the Spitfire red - I have read somewhere this is only for the prototype and it will be removed on the final watches.
    The watches are on the IWC store at IWC.com with the red text, and all PDF versions of 2019 catalogues have been released with red text on dials. I think it's final. On the black I love it, on the green less so, but I don't think it ruins it.

  20. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyp View Post
    As for the Spitfire red - I have read somewhere this is only for the prototype and it will be removed on the final watches.
    Ah I've figured it out - ignore my post above. The red text is final on all watches EXCEPT the chronograph. If you look at the catalogues, that has been removed. But the UTC in green still has it.

  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammond View Post
    Ah I've figured it out - ignore my post above. The red text is final on all watches EXCEPT the chronograph. If you look at the catalogues, that has been removed. But the UTC in green still has it.
    Oh thanks for that - strange choice. Probably ran out of space with the chronograph!

    You never know if there is enough feedback they may change it!

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Qatar-wol View Post
    Looks like the tribute to Mk11, the one I just posted a WTB for!
    Jup it's the Tribute to Mark xi - I have a had a look closer at the date placement and it is ever so subtly different (for the better) compared to the Mark xviii. I'd prefer if it was 38-39mm instead of 40mm, but do agree this version is most excellent (and I haven't noticed it before).
    Last edited by crazyp; 14th January 2019 at 21:52. Reason: Correcting the model name

  23. #23
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    London
    Posts
    330
    Quote Originally Posted by bwest76 View Post
    I think they got it right with mine I wouldn’t swap it.


    I see what they've done there. It's a 'clipped wing' Spitfire, based on the wing modification to some Spits to make them roll quicker than a Fw-190.


  24. #24
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    293
    Well it looks to me that IWC have got their act together and maybe back on track giving people what they want not what they think they want, love the three hander!

  25. #25
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down south jukin
    Posts
    5,257
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Qatar-wol View Post
    Looks like the tribute to Mk11, the one I just posted a WTB for!
    It’s the very watch,sorry but I am not looking to sell.




    upload picture

  26. #26
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,430
    IWC actually realising they've overshot on the sizes and knocking off a mm? I'm pinching myself to check I'm not dreaming.

  27. #27
    Grand Master magirus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Up North hinny
    Posts
    39,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Qatar-wol View Post
    I'm not convinced. There are a lot of different colours on that dial - green, white, aged lume cream, red. Bit of a muddle, IMO. Again, nice to the UTC, but bronze, with a green dial? The bronze takes the colour count to five (six, if you include the brown of the strap.)

    Also, the UTC is a 50% premium over the bronze chronograph? How did they come up with these prices? Is it just a cynical application of what they think the market will support?

    No thank you. I prefer to think that IWC produced no new watches past about 2005 or so.
    I agree with all of the above.
    F.T.F.A.

  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammond View Post

    WTF is going on with the minute hand, the lume in particular? Is there a hole in it?

  29. #29
    Journeyman Cybotron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    131
    I kinda like this one

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  30. #30
    Master hhhh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Cloud 9
    Posts
    4,298
    Quote Originally Posted by cannondale View Post
    Well it looks to me that IWC have got their act together
    Certainly have with this one, I reckon...


  31. #31
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic
    Posts
    57
    Looks "different" in bronze, but I quite like it!

  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Yorkshireman at heart
    Posts
    3,179
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyp View Post
    Jup it's the Mark xi - I have a had a look closer at the date placement and it is ever so subtly different (for the better) compared to the Mark xviii. I'd prefer if it was 38-39mm instead of 40mm, but do agree this version is most excellent (and I haven't noticed it before).
    Tribute to Mark xi, not the actual Mark xi

  33. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by trident-7 View Post
    Tribute to Mark xi, not the actual Mark xi
    Yes - a mistake in my text, I did mean the tribute.

  34. #34
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,252
    As much as I like IWC, the main issue I have are the hands, they just don't look right and I would prefer the previous style re-introduced again.

  35. #35
    I think IWC is getting back on track since George Kern’s departure……He’s now destroying Breitling…..

  36. #36
    Master JC180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    2,706
    Watched the video on Hodinkee and tbh the quality of the dials and especially the printing and alignment looks pretty off to me.

    I hope these are all pre-production prototypes or ill be staying away from IWC longer than I already have...

  37. #37
    Journeyman Cybotron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    131
    This one is certainly different

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  38. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by JC180 View Post
    Watched the video on Hodinkee and tbh the quality of the dials and especially the printing and alignment looks pretty off to me.

    I hope these are all pre-production prototypes or ill be staying away from IWC longer than I already have...
    Very good point actually. Lets hope so.

    Incidentally Revolution magazine have released an edition in 36mm bronze with proper hands. Why this isn't part of the regular line up I have no idea.


  39. #39
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by JC180 View Post
    Watched the video on Hodinkee and tbh the quality of the dials and especially the printing and alignment looks pretty off to me.

    I hope these are all pre-production prototypes or ill be staying away from IWC longer than I already have...
    In several of the videos I've watched Chris Grainger-Herr is at pains to state that most of them are prototypes so I've let most of the obvious quality issues slide. I do find it frustrating though because you don't really know what is going to end up being sold. The "mojave" ceramic chrono for example, i've seen a version with black hands, one with sand hands, then the other chrono has been seen with and without spitfire text, some of the straps have been said to be work in progress.

    I know the show is for the trade and so it's to be expected, but when you're plugging everything directly to the public as well, and then putting the images on your web store it's bloody annoying. Don't distribute it if it's not ready.

  40. #40
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    1,178
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyp View Post
    Very good point actually. Lets hope so.

    Incidentally Revolution magazine have released an edition in 36mm bronze with proper hands. Why this isn't part of the regular line up I have no idea.


    That watch is shown in this video. Bronze not for me, and a lot of guff about old leather, but the hands are nice. My main take away from it is that Wei Koh is utterly insufferable and Grainger-Herr has the patience of a saint.


  41. #41
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Down south jukin
    Posts
    5,257
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by stix View Post
    As much as I like IWC, the main issue I have are the hands, they just don't look right and I would prefer the previous style re-introduced again.

    Which is why I bought mine above.

  42. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammond View Post
    That watch is shown in this video. Bronze not for me, and a lot of guff about old leather, but the hands are nice. My main take away from it is that Wei Koh is utterly insufferable and Grainger-Herr has the patience of a saint.

    I think your tribute is a good compromise and agree on all the marketing huff from them. Conclusion really is to get one of Eddie's Speedbirds...

  43. #43
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,252
    Quote Originally Posted by bwest76 View Post
    Which is why I bought mine above.
    Looks good and to my eye if the new models had the same hands they would look a lot better and in keeping with the IWC style that I enjoy.

  44. #44
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,257
    Really not a fan of that green at all and would be good to have bracelet options. Not for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information