Reply With QuoteNot sure anyone will be able to give much of a view as the photos are out of focus.
Following on from my papers or no papers thread, with the pemission of the seller to upload photos here, what’s everyone’s thoughts on this one?
Is the box correct (old style)?
Thanks
Berty
Last edited by Berty234; 4th January 2019 at 15:58.
Not sure anyone will be able to give much of a view as the photos are out of focus.
The box is not not correct for an M serial watch
Thought not, hmmm, thanksOriginally Posted by Van Diemen
They look better if clicked on, but not the greatest I know :)
I have that box but for a 1997 14060...
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
i would ask the seller for clearer pics. if they do not come in, with or without a valid reason (can't think of any valid reason at all tbh), I would stay away.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Hopefully these look better - zoomed in and print screened :)
My 2004 14060M came with a wooden box like that.
I think Rolex changed to the newer box shortly after I got it.
Better when clicked on I think
Best I can get em. Given box issue, I think I know what to do...
Last edited by Berty234; 4th January 2019 at 19:25.
2005/2006 is when they changed to the new boxes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can't say anything about the boxes but the 14060 watch looks good to me.
I dislike the ROLEXROLEXROLEX-engraving on the rehaut on these later ones but that's just me.
When changes to the rehaut were made didn’t the case lose the lug holes or was that just the Explorer II and GMT? Or have I got that wrong..
Last edited by murkeywaters; 4th January 2019 at 22:52.
No. 14060 was the exception. It always had lugholes and hollow end links... until the end of its production.
Thanks for the info, I never knew that.
Never took any notice before, just assumed that it was the same case as the Sub Date.
Posting Permissions
