Originally Posted by
W44NNE
I'm totally with Jacob, as I'm also an owner of a Tesla. If you'd have told me that 7 weeks ago, I'd have laughed at you, but I thought "why not" to taking an S out on a 24hr test drive, and I was so impressed, I had one on the drive 3 days later. I'm very much a "petrol head", not a hippy etc, and I'm most likely going to buy a third car with an engine as I do miss the pops and bangs of the Porsche I had, but the Tesla is actually more than enough if we don't get another car.
The original Teslas were poor quality, but the second generation car is completely different in terms of both technology and its mechanical underpinnings. Reliability is much better overall and I've covered 3k miles in around 6 weeks without issue; instead, I've found long journeys a breeze, as I'm sat in a very quiet car that pretty much drives me where I'm going, plus I have the car's own Spotify and Tunein radio playing me all the music I could ever want. There will always be stories of nightmare cars, but I've never seen anything different with any car I've owned. I had four MINIs, all were terrible but I enjoyed the cars so much, I put up with the faults, until eventually, enough was enough.
The Supercharger network is why I went for a Tesla, and didn't even bother test drying an i-pace. I did go and sit in one but thought it was a typical Jaguar; perfect for the older gent but surprisingly full of buttons, and I think what people perceive as quality, is sometimes just over-styled design. Ian Callum is not who should be in charge at Jaguar; he's only got the F-Type right in his time there, and now even that's looking worse with the constant addition of extra sills etc. My Model S has air suspension that can be raised, so I see the Jaguar as no better in an off-road scenario... which I did actually have to use the Tesla in recently as we stayed at a house in the middle of a farm.
Back to the Supercharger, I get it free for the life of the car, and I simply add 20 mins to any estimated journey time, as that's all I've needed on long runs to gain around 100 miles or so extra... good luck doing that in an I-Pace currently, where that'll more likely take hours on your average charger.
I'm not naive. There's a chance that when the Model 3 is released, there'll be queues at charger stations. However, the Model 3 has a longer range and therefore people are more likely to destination charge. Also, of course it's known that Lithium mining etc is harmful to the environment, however if anyone will make batteries less harmful, it'll be Tesla; they're already developing new battery technology. A lot of the comparisons you see vs. fossil fuels don't include the well at the beginning of the fossil fuel process; A 70KW battery car will take only around a year or so to catch up with a fossil car in terms of emissions, although I admit to knowing little about how these batteries are recycled or disposed of, but Tesla batteries are found to only degrade by around 10% after 8 years and hundreds of thousands of miles on the oldest cars.
The fact is, most of the people I know that hate SUVs have never driven one, and most of the people I know who hate EVs haven't driven one either; if they have, it's some crappy Leaf which are known to have severe battery degradation and be a really short term car that'll cost you a fortune once you have issues like that.
Don't knock it until you try it as they say; whoever "they" are.