LV or ROO - What Would You Do?

[verv]

AP’s are lovely and I’m craving one big time but as I have been told by a AP watchmaker non COSC and tolerances less than your old common Rollie...!

if you get a well regulated one straight off the bat then they can run and run at +/- 0-1

[andy tims]

I would hold onto the LV.

Ditto

[chris56]

Like others have said, I would keep the LV. It is a great watch which will stand the test of time.

[learningtofly]

if you get a well regulated one straight off the bat then they can run and run at +/- 0-1

Mine seems to be there or thereabouts.

[DMC102]

Thanks to all who contributed to this.

After much soul-searching, I can't bring myself to part with the LV, so the ROO remains on the wish-list for now.

The winner:

[paskinner]

''The Kermit is extremely subtle''......in what universe would that be?

[WhopperSenior]

Personally I would keep the LV and wear it all the time. I understand wanting a mint and rare watch but I'd be treating it like any other watch I own. Hopefully one day I'll get a Daytona and you'd better believe I'm going to wear it for virtually everything. When I hand it to my son in twenty years time I want it to look like it's been used and I doubt I'll care than I could have made a few quid if I sold it.

[Rolex16622]

LV is a keeper....

[Massi1234]

I guess the AP is one of my favourite. I would swap!

[garyfisher]

Kermit is on the top of my wishlist right now. Good choice. I hope I'll be able to find a nice full set for a decent price.