They withheld my warranty card on my Root Beer but luckily I received the watch which I am able to wear and that's the main point of me buying it so it's fine by me. If anything goes wrong it just gets sent back via the AD. The point of this is to discourage profiteering which means more of us get the chance to buy at RRP so I'm confused what the issue is? Blame the profiteers not the ADs.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
To me AD’s are trying to protect themselves as much as possible with all that’s going in the the grey market and fear of losing their dealership - something that seems to be happening. There is talk of Rolex culling a lot more AD’s, especially the smaller ones in towns. Maybe more boutiques are the way forward?
I’ve never had a card held back, however the AD I use are apparently since March (advice from Rolex at Baselworld) holding back all cards, even for long standing clients. I buy to wear and enjoy - so far I’ve never taken the box out and admire the warranty card. If this becomes the norm, accept it or buy another brand - don’t spend your life fighting it though, life’s too precious for that.
My new ND sub has been returned for adjustment, and my AD told me not to forget my warranty card when going there.
I said errr you've got it! Ah yes good point.
So they had to ring rolex st james and explain.
I really can’t work out what the AD gains from this especially as all its going to do is drive prices higher for items with cards.
I for one can’t wait until the market collapses and I can just go back to enjoy watches I want
Last edited by number2; 17th July 2019 at 04:18.
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."
"You gotta know when to hold em and know when to fold em".
Well done for taking this up, and thank you for the update on this.
Getting what you have paid for is never wrong. And clearly, leaving parts of what you have paid for with an AD is no good when they actually lose your property!
A key point that is worth noting here is that the AD lost the items they had pledged to keep safe. This is quite interesting, isn't it. A cynic might wonder if the warranty card was really lost or ended up being sold elsewhere.
As a matter of interest, I take it that the County Court claim did not go to a hearing? If so, that is unfortunate because it would have been good to get a legal ruling on this, albeit County Court rulings aren't precedent setting.
Also, what was the outcome of the ADR/arbitration? I note that the arbitration had to be paid for by the AD and I cannot help but observe that could be a useful DoS vector for those who dislike this poor service by ADs.
I also question the need to correspond with the AD for three months. Were it me, a much shorter series of letters would have sufficed to establish that they weren't going to provide everything that should have been part of the overall product package. I'd also skip their own arbitration procedure, if possible, unless it could be used to bring cost pressure to bear.
If the aim by ADs in providing this poor level of service is to prevent sales into the grey market then, let's face it, it isn't working and (as I said months ago) cannot work. All it does is insult and inconvenience legitimate customers whilst doing nothing substantive to stop the grey channel. ADs are damaging their own reputation and sustainability by actively distrusting their own customers in this manner. I feel sure that they will come to regret it.
Last edited by markrlondon; 17th July 2019 at 04:58.
As I pointed out to you in another thread, that is really not how it works. In fact, you know it's not how it works, don't you.
The fact that a person left the shop with a product in a certain state does not mean that that is necessarily the end of the matter. If the product was incomplete (i.e. did not contain what should have been in the box) then both legally and morally the buyer is still owed the rest of the product that they paid for. Weasel words like "hang tags and warranty cards are not part of the product" do not change this fundamental reality.
Last edited by markrlondon; 17th July 2019 at 05:22.
As has been mentioned before, my only real issue with this practice is when someone who owns the watch has an emergency, or needs to raise capital quickly. Selling watches is a great way to quickly raise capital and I have done it myself in the past.
Their ability to sell THEIR watch is greatly diminished as the AD has the warranty card and buyers are more reluctant to buy. I was looking for a good analagy from another industry but I honestly cant think of one. Perhaps its like buying a car and the Dealer keeping the V5 for the year?
You wouldn't accept that so why should we accept this?
lots of people buys these watches as there is a trade in them.
ADs ask to keep the cards to avoid the trade/flip.
If you are buying to trade then this is crap.
If you arent buying to trade then this is cool.
last 3 rolexes I have bought have all had the cards left with dealer to give them confidence to sell these items (that so many people want) to me.
My dealer did say 'look if you came in and said im struggling and need to sell to get some cash" then they would give you the card straight away.......but probably just not sell you anymore rare/hard to get watches.
Cheers
Sorry I don’t understand your point ?
QUOTE=Skyman;5152216]Me, who cares? Flip or keep. Take your chances.[/QUOTE]
Yeah cool I totally agree
But what if you don’t want to keep it ? Say you loose your job or fall in love with an expensive woman !
What gives them the right to withhold something that comes as part of an overpriced watch ?
That’s my point 🤔
Simple. If you intend to keep the watch, the absence of the warranty card (to be handed to you in 12 months, or shorter if need be) cannot be an issue.[/QUOTE]
Yeah ok
QUOTE=Skyman;5152249][/QUOTE]
Do not buy the watch in the first place.[/QUOTE]
A few of points;
First point of action, trading standards you have to report it, I know as a result of my noise and pressure, there is now a written agreement that get signed at the point of sale and a letter in the post that tells you all the points you agreed to, at least from this AD Chain.
Before you go to ADR, you have to exhaust every avenue of reaching an amicable resolution with the retailer.Otherwise you can not open a case .
ADR wanted a copy of the terms and condition os sale, otherwise the retailer in their view can do what ever it wants, in an ADR I have to establish the facts , not the retailer. ADR is paid for by the retailer and their ruling is advisory only.
When you have exhausted ADR, you can go to a small claims court, it is a step that is necessary , at least I believe. As I said the process was handled by lawyers under Legal Cover of my home and contents insurance.
The dates for Small Claims in my area are 6 Months + , so there was no point.
I have switched from a Retail Chain Rolex AD, to a local family owned one, plus point is you do not need to put up with the crap, negative point, they don't have the volumes to get a lot of professional models.
I travel a lot for work and go through Heathrow T5 weekly, try and buy a Sub of GMT . There are 4400 BA pilots who have all put their names down for a one or both . Yes the Rolex/watches of Switzerland guys are polite and will take your name , but after a while they tell you no chance! You telling me they will all want to use the dual time of GMT when they can get a Rolex Explorer that does the same job or even a Tag Heuer GMT ? It is a bubble that will eventually burst and go back to normal, 400 years ago was Tulips, 20 years ago , beanie baby's and today we talk Rolex. :-)
That's an improvement, from what I have heard.
That is reasonable, of course. The same as with court action. But all the same, if it were me doing it myself I don't think I would have gone to ADR or spent too much time establishing the facts with the retailer.
No matter what, it sounds like change for the better overall.
Many thanks for your feedback. Very informative.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-a9015001.html
They have more, but I was just making a general point, it was said in jest.
Surely if an AD under instruction from Rolex keeps a card from your purchase they should be made to replace the card.
Rolex chose to have the card retained by their own AD. They should surely accept responsibility for the consequence of their decisions.
"Recommended" to the AD by...........
Photo courtesy of 33JS from this thread https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.p...ighlight=rolex
Good
If you don't like Rolex terms and conditions then the simple answer is to buy something else.
It would at least to me to suggest they do require it.
Certainly when they are cutting AD numbers.
They (AD or Rolex) should be obliged to replace the items they withhold without the purchasers having requested it.
In my opinion going by the letter it’s only suggested ( sure it is a suggestion ) they remove stickers this should be done before the sale goes through or I should be asked for permission to meddle with my watch.
These I know are opinions this is mine for an expensive purchase
I think some people’s warranty cards shouldn’t just be withheld. They should be burnt or shredded in their presence:-)
Just my opinion
12 months fly by I can't see the issue here. Wonder how many Pepsi's will hit the Grey network now they've been out a good 12 months. I think we'll see a spike of them now advertised as a full set
I'd sooner they kept the card than rip the stickers off in front of you
I was lucky when I got my BLNR last October, told my AD car park ticket about to run out. She let me take it fully stickered and with card
Last edited by forest172; 28th July 2019 at 13:01.
Yachtmaster 40 Everose gold in stock, picking up tomorrow, at the current price as on Jan 1st 7.4% price rise.
They also had a steel and Everose gold at half the price, so not as rare as you think, if you are not after a Hulk or Daytona you can get one.
For all those who thought it could not happen and they AD's had the law on their side, well the judge thought different.
Picked up my warranty card from Laings in Glasgow today for my BLNR that I purchased in September.
They also confirmed the price increase and no deliveries until the new year.
Been to my AD at least 5-6 times now since the news broke out and have even bought a few things from them. No mention of warranty cards at all still...
They won’t mention it unless you ask, or have one that’s held to ransom, in which case, you still have to ask!