closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 101 to 109 of 109

Thread: The Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier

  1. #101
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Eastern England
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by sestrel View Post
    The Russians are just jealous. Their carrier, the partly floating old unreliable junkpile Kuznetzov, is all but useless. It actually has an ocean going tug with in case it breaks down! Which it does regularly!
    They don't need radar to track the Kutzitsnutsoff they just follow the smoke! :)

  2. #102
    Grand Master VDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Whitehole
    Posts
    18,967
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyg View Post
    Slow news day.
    I say a very slow news day old bean.
    Fas est ab hoste doceri

  3. #103
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Plymouth Devon
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by Dunce View Post
    Leaking stern seal? No big deal. Probably a Simplex oil-filled system and a balance of internal oil pressure and external sea water pressure. Increasing seal oil pressure causes external oil leakage (and pollution). Allowing water ingress instead keeps the problem contained and the water can be removed from the system by decanting or separation. The seals can be routinely renewed afloat by ballasting fwd to clear the seal box or by divers using a mobdoc or cofferdam arrangement. Luckily the days of stern gland repacking are long gone. In 25 years at sea I've seen dozens of these seals repaired and the only time it required dry docking and tail shaft removal was due to shaft damage.

    It must be a slooooow day in the MSM.
    I may be wrong but I believe that they have an emergency inflatable seal which can be pumped up to permit work on the seal without breaching watertight integrity.

    I can’t believe the press and TV coverage- BBC insisting this is “highly embarrassing “ to the RN. Why exactly? Who would be embarrassed if the had a minor fault on a new car that was fixed under warranty.

    BBC continued to pedal this line despite several interviewees insisting that it was a minor issue. At one stage they wheeled out a Naval Historian to comment; a marine engineer might have been more useful.

  4. #104
    Grand Master TheFlyingBanana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bedfordshire and your back garden
    Posts
    23,252
    Quote Originally Posted by Dunce View Post
    Leaking stern seal? No big deal. Probably a Simplex oil-filled system and a balance of internal oil pressure and external sea water pressure. Increasing seal oil pressure causes external oil leakage (and pollution). Allowing water ingress instead keeps the problem contained and the water can be removed from the system by decanting or separation. The seals can be routinely renewed afloat by ballasting fwd to clear the seal box or by divers using a mobdoc or cofferdam arrangement. Luckily the days of stern gland repacking are long gone. In 25 years at sea I've seen dozens of these seals repaired and the only time it required dry docking and tail shaft removal was due to shaft damage.

    It must be a slooooow day in the MSM.
    Yeah. I was going to say that but you beat me to it.

    Repacking those stern glands eh? I’m glad that’s well in the past now.

    😜

  5. #105
    Craftsman Dunce's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Hampshire, but made in Co Durham
    Posts
    539
    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalMass View Post
    I may be wrong but I believe that they have an emergency inflatable seal which can be pumped up to permit work on the seal without breaching watertight integrity.

    I can’t believe the press and TV coverage- BBC insisting this is “highly embarrassing “ to the RN. Why exactly? Who would be embarrassed if the had a minor fault on a new car that was fixed under warranty.

    BBC continued to pedal this line despite several interviewees insisting that it was a minor issue. At one stage they wheeled out a Naval Historian to comment; a marine engineer might have been more useful.
    No, you're right about an inflatable seal. It's used to shut off any sea water ingress by sealing around the stopped shaft. Not all manufacturers use this but the likes of Simplex and Deep Sea Seals do. Having recently retired from the industry please allow me a walk down memory lane with a couple of seal repair pictures from my library.

    Build a tent and pump it full of air. Same technology as used by ancient Greeks and Romans for bridge foundation building.



    Pop inside for the repair itself. Simples.


  6. #106
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Plymouth Devon
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by Dunce View Post
    No, you're right about an inflatable seal. It's used to shut off any sea water ingress by sealing around the stopped shaft. Not all manufacturers use this but the likes of Simplex and Deep Sea Seals do. Having recently retired from the industry please allow me a walk down memory lane with a couple of seal repair pictures from my library.

    Build a tent and pump it full of air. Same technology as used by ancient Greeks and Romans for bridge foundation building.



    Pop inside for the repair itself. Simples.

    I have dealt with Deep Sea Seals many times as an engineer in the submarine business. Seal leakage not unknown but, of course, depth dependent.

  7. #107
    POW has the same issue. I’m just watching it edge out of dry dock as I write this.

  8. #108
    It’s going to need fixing?
    It will cost millions?
    It will be FoC to RN because BAE & sub-contractors will be picking up full costs?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #109
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire
    Posts
    5,944
    Quote Originally Posted by BillyCasper View Post
    It’s going to need fixing?
    It will cost millions?
    It will be FoC to RN because BAE & sub-contractors will be picking up full costs?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Whenever we talk about who will be picking up the costs for fixing snags like this, it’s worth remembering the cost estimate for each carrier has risen from £1.5Bn in 2007 to £3.1Bn at completion.

    So, FoC is probably a stretch!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information