Well, all this may be irrelevant now. According to the blogger 'Frederico', all new guarantees will be for the original owner and none transferable. Rolex will be able to detect grey sales and there will be no guarantee. Same with used watches. All guarantees none transferable. They seem to hsve worked out how too operate such a system using photocopies of the original AD paperwork.
Let's see if Frederico is correct. He seems well connected......it would change the market and give ADs a powerful sales weapon. Whether this applies internationally, who knows.
Time will tell. But swing tags would be the least of the problem for resellers.i noticed that ADs in the UK were photocopying paperwork for Rolex HQ earlier this year. So, if correct, this plan has been evolving for some time. There seems to be a new database, which ADs and service depts can access, which records original paperwork and signatures. Otherwise you need the original sales receipt.
Nb: active debate on the Rolex Forum. Something is going on. It will take time for the dust to settle . And I suppose the U.K. Could take it's own path, at least for a while.
Last edited by paskinner; 22nd November 2016 at 23:51.
It's the only controllable method as far as I can see. Only products sold by ADs will be guaranteed. It could put a stop to 'grey' dealers, but it could also damage resale values which could be catastrophic. Good resale value is the main reason many buy Rolex over other brands, if that position weakens it would be a crazy move.
Utter nonsense.
Photo's or photocopies prove only the point of sale occurred and not the sales price, and they can be photoshopped.
Grey dealers exist because of the red tape and hype and do well because of it - they will continue to do so. Watches will simply be sold as .New, pre-owned'.
They can fight it all they want but most Rolex dealers struggle due to the amount of 'average' stuff they have to take as part of their inventory, which is partly why the grey market flourishes.
It is illegal in most of Europe including (currently) the UK to not honour a warranty beyond the original owner - Federico is misinformed.
When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........
I fear you may find that 'utter nonsense' is not an adequate reply. But the whole subject of the Rolex guarantee has attracted dispute for years.
Anyway, we'll see. But my AD has certainly been sending photos of the warrant card direct to Rolex. There has to be some purpose in that. So I think that something is going on, unless they just enjoy pointless extra work.
Which is always possible.
Last edited by paskinner; 23rd November 2016 at 04:17.
I'm a difficult customer at the best of times so extracting an extra £600 she must have been doing something right. Service was 9/10. I didn't get offered champagne and the stickers were removed. I'll wear it more than its kept in the safe so not a deal breaker for me. But I really did sense due to her deliberate actions that something was happening behind the scenes... Which was probably the conversation you were having with Karl. Dealers think all customers are blogging each other, maybe they're right!
What is it you want to know about the warranty card? They didn't keep it if that's what you're getting at. Cheers.
I bought a new Sub C a few weeks ago. No mention of requiring to remove the stickers. I also asked for and was given the plastic shipping container.
The warranty card was swiped to activate the warranty and all was well. The only thing that was written on the card was my name and purchase date.
It is adequate, you might not like it but it pretty much sums up what your cited blogger has alluded to. It is all part of the ongoing 'charade', along with multi year waiting lists etc.
AD's seem to like spending time spouting guff and bluster in general so what is 20 seconds of scanning in the great scheme of things?
When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........
My address isn't on my warranty card. Wasnt asked for it.
IIRC the guarantee is worded to the effect that it's only honoured if the watch is supplied by an AD. Will go dig.
Jesus Christ
Is the plastic shipping container now going to be part of a "full set"
Becoming ridiculous
Hi Colin-
I just wanted to see a quick photo of the warranty card from your Saturday Rolex purchase at DM Robinson to ensure you actually made one...I'm suspicious by nature and just thought it was odd your first ever post was regarding this issue and DM Robinson- are you Karl by any chance? Lol😀 Let's see your warranty card from Saturday👍
It's just a matter of time...
Was recently in an AD and mentioned this thread topic regarding removal of stickers and keeping the hang tags. He said the only thing they do is insist that the warranty is completed online and on the warranty card.
He recently had a a US customer who did not want the warranty card completed but when informed of the policy, asked if it could be done in pencil. AD said it had to be done in pen not pencil.
While AD was completing the warranty card, the customer was negotiating the sale of the watch via phone to a punter back in the US.
As he was visiting Ireland on holiday, he could claim the VAT on leaving the country and make a tidy profit when he returned home. Nice one!
As I mentioned in a previous post, I received everything with my recent Submariner purchase at a different AD.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I picked up a D-blu Deepsea yesterday from a Rolex AD.
It was untouched in the plastic delivery case from the Rolex factory -
All stickers and hang tags untouched........
If anyone has any nonsense like I had from DM Robinson I urge them to just go to
a sensible AD elsewhere and not tolerate any crap.
You may like this story which begins six years ago, from which a lesson might better have been learned.
In December 2010 I spent £168,000 at auction in a single day buying over 60 unworn, stickered Rolex watches including Sea Dwellers 16600s, stainless steel Date Submariner 16610s, Yachtmaster 16622s, Explorers 14270 / 114270 / 16570 and others. Oddly, all the watches lacked bracelets. The story was that HMRC had intercepted the watches being smuggled into the UK in parts; Customs had seized the watch-heads and ultimately auctioned them off in a single sale to an audience of international dealers and private buyers. We were the largest buyer by far and took home over a third of the entire sale.
We then arranged directly with Rolex UK the purchase of all the new, genuine bracelets required to make the watches complete, for another £40,000+. I had always enjoyed lovely relations with their team at the time and my approach was direct: "I do not wish to source these bracelets from abroad; we have always been straight with one another so it seems right that I come to you to arrange supply." They responded with immediate grace and pragmatism, as was their habit.
Quite reasonably, one of Rolex's conditions was that we must conduct the deal which they had agreed through our local AD (David M. Robinson), who would make very good money out of the sale.
I tried to contact John Robinson, the MD and son of DMR himself (the latter by all accounts being a lovely man). Despite Rolex UK's having arranged the deal happily, JR would not return repeated calls and when finally pinned down wanted to grill me on where and how I would sell the watches etc. He said he would think about it....then again would not return further calls.
I decided to write to Rolex UK, advising them of their AD's miserable behaviour in the light of what had been agreed directly with them and asking if we might instead choose to be supplied through another, more professional AD on the same terms.
Suddenly Karl Irwin, whom I believe to be JR's brother-in-law (but obviously earned his position through his customer service skills) made contact, offering to conclude the deal. I made it very clear what I thought of the organ-grinder under the circumstances and that their opportunity was now lost. His brief pleading was quickly silenced.
I understand that hideous embarrassment and irritation were felt at Bexley. They did not hesitate in agreeing to the use of a different AD.
I believe that I retain original correspondence.
The bracelets were willingly supplied by an AD whom I had not used before, with charm and humour. That was the beginning of a fine friendship which remains to this day. Indeed, most ADs enjoy happy relationships with other jewellers and watch dealers who play with a straight bat.
David M. Robinson had and still has some wonderful staff, who love their products and can provide the very best of service. Some members here appear to know a few and I hope may long enjoy their service. However, the company has some people in the most senior positions who let them down.
Rolex agencies are gone. Shops closed or closing.
I am sorry for their staff, a number of whom have recently approached me for employment.
The swing-tag situation may be regarded by some as a microcosm of the attitude prevailing above.
As a retailer, the customer is the special one, not you. We all get it wrong at times, but some get it wrong a lot more often and with apparent indifference.
H
Last edited by Haywood_Milton; 4th December 2016 at 11:31.
Picked up an LV from my local Goldsmiths yesterday. Stickers intact, both hang tags, bezel protector, and transit case supplied. Name and postcode with the date written on the warranty card (in pen) and the warranty card then photocopied.
I sort of understand their position a bit more on your story Haywood than the hang tag/sticker fiasco.
They have obviously taken the hump that Rolex were going to facilitate a competing business to them who is not an official dealership.
Can't speak for them but possibly peed off that Rolex wanted them to provide a nice smooth transaction on the bracelets and then you have the opportunity to undercut them and not be bound by any of Rolexes dealership rules.
Looking at it from the outside I can understand them being annoyed at Rolex for this but once Rolex had agreed to it they might as well have got on with it and made a bit of money from it.
I still don't understand why the OP didn't get straight on the phone to Rolex. This is exactly what I would have done
absolutely.... that's why DMR is losing accreditation and staff and Haywood is "in business" and they are having a myriad of problems.......
The purchaser's experience is a small part of what's going on there but a good indicator that not all is well back at the ranch............
Well at least I don't have to ask them to remove the stickers now, bloody awful job that and they always miss one, the little one under the tab that clips over the clasp.
I don't understand the problem, they are effectively looking after the customers investment so these watches can not be flipped at profit onto the secondhand market.
When I buy a watch I want the watch not the stickers nor the hang tag or the bloody polishing cloth.
Say you want to offer the watch to your son/wife/daughter? Or, you want to put it in the safe for investment?
Would you understand then why they want the stickers?
Now that you have at least one reason to keep them on, can you tell me what it changes for the retailer? He receives 2 watches that are highly in demand and sells both for the price he wants. How does removing the stickers bring him any added benefit?
(Btw, the backlash he gets here will cost him a few sales)
'Against stupidity, the gods themselves struggle in vain' - Schiller.
No you wouldn't take the person with you if it's a surprise, that would defeat the object. and I don't know how far your AD is from your place but it is usually not an expedition to go there.
As to the value... Well in 10 years time, should you decide to sell, one will be unused and the other one won't be. If both are on sale at the same price I know which one will go first.
I was annoyed with DM Robinson and by coincidence a day or two later I saw the owner of another Rolex AD at a social function.......I've had one or two watches from him previously and he's great to deal with- I asked him to find me a D-Blu and he kindly sorted it out.
With hindsight I should have just asked him in the first place.
It amazes me some folk here still say 'why do you care about stickers'- is it not general knowledge that a fully stickered
up unworn Rolex is worth more than an unstickered one- I may rip the stickers off and wear it immediately or I may stick it in the safe unworn for 10 years- but I want it to be my decision not the AD's.
How much more is it worth a few thousand a few hundred a few pence.
Right off to bed granddaughters here she's only 6 months old and I'm on the early shift.