As far as I am aware Rolex has never made a watch in titanium whereas for the likes of Omega and Breitling titanium is seen in their premium non precious metal sports watches.
Does anyone have any insight as to why Rolex hasn't gone down this path? I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks a titanium Sub would be awesome
Last edited by ryanb741; 5th January 2015 at 09:32.
We (WIS) are not the real customer base base for Rolex.
The average Rolex buyer still wants his/her watch nice and shiny.
Daddel.
Got a new watch, divers watch it is, had to drown the bastard to get it!
Maybe titanium is too modern material for them?
Because high-grade stainless steel is the best material available for making watches. Nothing else is as durable, repairable and good-looking. I appreciate titanium, but I'll take stainless over it any day for a normal-sized watch.
I suspect that Breitling, Panerai and others use titanium because so many of their watches are so damn big and bulky. Rolex's design doesn't need the weight reduction to make it wearable (the excessive 116000 excepted, and even that has titanium in its construction).
So yes, they do use titanium and they use it well, but it's not necessary for anything except their novelty diver's watch.
I expect weight is an issue as well. The average customer wants something hefty in their hand to just the cost.
Evolution, not revolution... yawn!
DSSD caseback is Titanium which I think is their first and only use of it. It's a start perhaps.
A 'Rolexed' Pelagos would be a fantastic watch.
Quite a few seem to be speaking for the 'average customer'.
Who is this mythical character?
People buying a Rolex are a heterogenous group. The myth that their average customer is someone buying a watch because it is recognized and shiny and showy is a myth,IMO. Sure there are some who buy a watch for these reasons but that they constitute the vast majority of non WIS Rolex buying population is an erroneous belief.
I like titanium watches and have several (Aerospaces, SMP Ti, GP Sea Hawk Pro 3000) but steel always looks 'smarter' than titanium's gun-metal's sleekness. For that reason I can see why Rolex concentrate on steel.
Brushed steel perhaps, but titanium can take a polish just as well as stainless steel does, except hardly anyone bothers to go the extra mile and do so, bar Seiko and Citizen.
I heard a story from someone once that Red Adair had a titanium rolex watch.
Red Adair wore a Gold Day-Date
If you like your watches to look shiny and new, Ti isn't for you. Unless treated in some way, it quickly forms a dull grey patina of titanium oxide, which creates a nice satin finish (and very effectively prevents against corrosion, because it is corrosion). It's also very soft and marks easily, which suits those of us who want to look as though we're industrial divers, not jewellery addicts.
...but what do I know; I don't even like watches!
If that's as good as it gets, then it looks like they need to try harder – you won't see the distortion on a Grand Seiko like you do there on the Omega.
Not knocking Omega or bigging up Seiko – just pointing out what can be seen by anyone if they choose to notice.
It may be a small point that other aspects of either brand are more important to the individual, but still one nonetheless.
Last edited by PJ S; 6th January 2015 at 17:49.
Must admit the new SM 300 Master coaxial in ti that I bought on Sunday has terrific finishing, the best I ever had though was my Grand Seiko Snowflake (sadly departed) that was made of titanium but had such an incredible polishing job done that it 'zinged' more than the brightest SS watch. How on earth Seiko can achieve that level of finish I don't know *they call it 'Zaratsu' polishing based on century old techniques for polishing samurai swords but whatever they did it was terrific
Black reflection to the right of the crown, it's hard not to see it.
Titanium grade that Seiko uses for the GS models? Don't know, don't care.
If it's something you're genuinely interested in knowing, for whatever reason, then the CS team in Japan will be only too happy to assist in furnishing you with that info.
Of course, that assumes the titanium alloy Seiko uses is identical in composition to that which Omega and others do – they may not be, and it's that, with the polishing technique employed, which creates the distortionless mirror appearance they've become renowned for since the introduction of the Ananta International range, almost a decade ago.
Last edited by PJ S; 6th January 2015 at 19:23.
I have a GS diver in polished Ti and Omega PO in Ti. Omega wins IMO as far as the finish goes.