closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Comparison Between Old & New CWC auto divers

  1. #1

    Cool Comparison Between Old & New CWC auto divers

    I just received one of the new CWC auto no-date divers. As I have an older auto no-date diver and the bead blasted quartz diver, I thought I'd do a simple short comparison.

    Here is a top view, the old is on the left and the new is on the right. The obvious difference is the circle-T and the circle-L.



    I noticed that the minute hand on the new is a bit wider than the one on the old. Can you see it, or is it only me?

    New


    Old



    Then there is the profile, again, the old is on the left and the new on the right.



    The new is about 1 - 2mm taller and feels noticeably heavier.

    The bezel is better than the old, smoother, and does not sound as 'tinny' as the bead-blasted quartz diver.

    So here it is, a very basic comparison.

    I like the fatter minute hand, but overall it's a bit tall.


    :)
    Last edited by TopCat; 20th April 2014 at 03:02. Reason: Typos & confused minute and hour hands! Challenging on an iPhone.

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    3,546
    The new one looks great,cant wait to purchase one of these.
    The only thing that stopped me buying one in the past,was that i had read reports on poor bezel action.
    Glad to hear the new one's an improvement.
    Thanks for sharing.

  3. #3
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    722

    A couple of other differences .....

    + The minute hand looks a tad wider and its base circular plate looks to have a wider diameter.

    + The bezel 'pip' is smaller.

    + The bezel print is a touch sharper, if not thinner as well.

    It is interesting that the case is thicker, perhaps the new automatic is being replicated closer to the 1981 original.

    Terry

  4. #4
    Hi Terry

    Wow, didn't notice those other differences.

    The case is very noticeably taller.

    regards




    Quote Originally Posted by Terry View Post
    + The minute hand looks a tad wider and its base circular plate looks to have a wider diameter.

    + The bezel 'pip' is smaller.

    + The bezel print is a touch sharper, if not thinner as well.

    It is interesting that the case is thicker, perhaps the new automatic is being replicated closer to the 1981 original.

    Terry

  5. #5
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    south
    Posts
    451
    Nice pair,had a old model and sold it .Not sure why I sold it because it ticks most boxes ie size , dial and hands spot on.....ooooooooo..back on the list lol

  6. #6
    Journeyman JMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    158
    Yes, I do necro threads, they're like time capsules and we're future space men exploring them.

    BUMP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information