closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: First ever $1m+ Rolex Daytona 'Paul Newman' sold at auction yesterday

  1. #1

    First ever $1m+ Rolex Daytona 'Paul Newman' sold at auction yesterday

    This very rare Paul Newman sold for over $1m yesterday-
    if you read the lot notes Christies excitingly tell you how 'oyster' is
    not written in the normal spot on the dial..........
    only around a dozen of these dials kicking around..........

    http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/w...9-9e5b25bf7eb8

    http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/recappi...x-daytona-sale

  2. #2
    Nice - but $1m nice???
    It's just a matter of time...

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    North west
    Posts
    4,117
    My Paul Newman dial daytona has just gone up a few grand.

















    In my head.

  4. #4
    Bonkers, that's just crazy money for a watch!

  5. #5
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mostly Germany
    Posts
    17,392
    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamanic View Post
    Nice - but $1m nice???
    The watch, or Paul Newman? :)

    The ceiling has been broken. There will be a flood of $1m+ vintage watches now, as tidal waves of wealth from the newest world makes their presence known with a shout!

    The only I have is with the description. "Important", they said. Yeah, sure it is. Mmm.
    Last edited by andrew; 11th November 2013 at 12:43.
    ...but what do I know; I don't even like watches!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by andrew View Post
    The watch, or Paul Newman? :)

    The ceiling has been broken. There will be a flood of $1m+ vintage watches now, as tidal waves of wealth from the newest world makes their presence known with a shout!

    The only I have is with the description. "Important", they said. Yeah, sure it is. Mmm.
    Yes- I agree- I've always found it ridiculous that they describe any watch as 'important'-
    it should read 'an important watch to a tiny number of people with lots of cash'

  7. #7
    Master petethegeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    2,930
    Quote Originally Posted by farmkid View Post
    Yes- I agree- I've always found it ridiculous that they describe any watch as 'important'-
    it should read 'an important watch to a tiny number of people with lots of cash'
    Somewhat OT, but this reminds me of the classic Bob Newhart line where he refers to a friend "who studied medicine and went on to specialise in diseases of the rich.".

  8. #8
    This is mad. It just proves that the ultra rich can be ultra stupid.

  9. #9
    Does anyone have a link for the rest of the sale prices in this auction?

  10. #10
    crazy price, but beautiful watch!

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by carryondentist View Post
    Does anyone have a link for the rest of the sale prices in this auction?
    Found it... http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/s...on=paging&pg=1


    Totally unbelievable prices, the cheapest vintage daytona was around $90,000 and even modern bi-metal Daytonas were $50k. What do you have to do to get a watch into these auctions - there is serious money to be made on some reasonably common watches.

    As predicted - I felt the estimates / targets were far below what excited, rich (and presumably stupid) collectors would pay.
    http://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.ph...tion-10-Nov-13

    Still want a catalogue though! Maybe that will be worth over a grand in a few years.

  12. #12
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    3,271
    Crazy prices and I wonder when the bubble will burst! If you are a WIS there are much better watches for $1m imo.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    14,189
    ha, the buyer is a real idiot. He should have bought a Certina - everybody knows they are miles better!

  14. #14
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Leamington
    Posts
    299
    Saw the article - absolutely incredible, unbelievable prices.

    Will the bubble burst? Is it even a bubble...?

  15. #15
    Master sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    UK/Canada
    Posts
    4,677
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh B View Post
    ha, the buyer is a real idiot.
    Yes, I know. I did get a bit carried away

    Fair warning: Once I hit 250 posts this'll be up on SC :)

  16. #16
    Master James.uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,785
    This has the feel of a bubble to me much like the Classic car boom of the late eighties... However after the crash that followed prices have gradually caught up with the boom years and in a much more gradual way. Even if this current bubble bursts ( which I think it might ) in time these will get back to this level of value. In short, they ain't making any more and they will continue to get rarer. I'm sure one or two still get discovered each year but a few probably also are lost.

    At one of the colleges I work in sometimes there is a chap who works part time in the reprographics dept. He has a Newman. Bought it new... Not a collector just a bloke who saw it new and liked it. Got a discount too as they didn't sell well.

    I popped in one day and told him what it was worth.... He nearly fell over.
    Might have to go see him again!

    James.

  17. #17
    Master Mark020's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    2,393
    Somebody made a nice return :-)


  18. #18
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,823
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh B View Post
    ha, the buyer is a real idiot. He should have bought a Certina - everybody knows they are miles better!
    Nah - you're thinking of Grand Seiko

  19. #19
    Grand Master jwg663's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    21.5 km From Moscow
    Posts
    16,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim W View Post
    This is mad. It just proves that the ultra rich can be ultra stupid.
    Who's more stupid: someone who is "ultra rich" paying £1m for a rare "important" watch with Christie's provenance or someone
    who is merely reasonably well-off paying £5k for a run-of-the-mill new Rolex, Omega, Panerai, JLC, IWC or Montblanc (others brands are also available) on the High St?
    ______

    ​Jim.

  20. #20
    An uninformed idiotic buyer! He should come here and read the history of Rolex. But guess too late to retract that bid!
    Could have bought a ton of Certinas and Grand Seikos for that amount!

  21. #21
    Grand Master boddah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,813
    Makes you wonder what one actually worn by Paul Newman would go for!
    "I looked with pity not untinged with scorn upon these trivial-minded passers-by"

  22. #22
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    52
    Crazy!

  23. #23
    I think its fair to say that for the buyer there is no 'opportunity cost'
    If you have a million dollars for a watch one can assume he already has
    a fleet of classic Ferrari's, a place in St Tropez and a trophy wife...

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Spain
    Posts
    23,658
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by RAJEN View Post
    An uninformed idiotic buyer! He should come here and read the history of Rolex. But guess too late to retract that bid!
    Could have bought a ton of Certinas and Grand Seikos for that amount!
    Imo it is neither idiotic nor a bubble. As was imo correctly observed this máy appear inflated but even if it would deflate it would recover is a few years. This is not about rare nor ´important´, not even about a watch at all, but about desreability and desireabiliy is not logical.

    This sale simply shows that value and product can be totally detached.
    That is the whole object of what B&H conceived in 1983. Market the mechanical as luxury and you can sell desireabilty at a premium instead of in vain trying to peddle outdated time keeping technology.

  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by boddah View Post
    Makes you wonder what one actually worn by Paul Newman would go for!
    During his talk at SalonQP Simon de Burton mentioned
    Newman's actual watch and said that auctioneers regard it
    as a '7 figure' Daytona- should his family ever decide to sell it.

  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by boddah View Post
    Makes you wonder what one actually worn by Paul Newman would go for!
    OMG! I thought that was.....doh!!

  27. #27
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    usually on a plane .....
    Posts
    1,027
    Quote Originally Posted by jwg663 View Post
    Who's more stupid: someone who is "ultra rich" paying £1m for a rare "important" watch with Christie's provenance or someone
    who is merely reasonably well-off paying £5k for a run-of-the-mill new Rolex, Omega, Panerai, JLC, IWC or Montblanc (others brands are also available) on the High St?
    :)

    if you own a £5k watch ..but you have to borrow money to buy your own home or car ..then id say you were a lot more likely to fit the 'stupid' category than if you had a million $ watch and $50million cash in the bank.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by farmkid View Post
    During his talk at SalonQP Simon de Burton mentioned
    Newman's actual watch and said that auctioneers regard it
    as a '7 figure' Daytona- should his family ever decide to sell it.

    now that would be one hell of sale.

  28. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Spain
    Posts
    23,658
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jedly1 View Post
    :)

    if you own a £5k watch ..but you have to borrow money to buy your own home or car ..then id say you were a lot more likely to fit the 'stupid' category than if you had a million $ watch and $50million cash in the bank.
    I second that wholeheartedly, BUT; it is all about priorities; pérsonal priorities, personal freedom.
    The thing which does influance us as a watch fora community as a whole though, is that those who borrowed to pay for an aspirational watch are the most motivated to agressively defend their expense on watch fora against those whom they need to brand ´haters´.
    That is where the freedom of the borrower-buyers treads the freedom of those who share/want more balanced information.

  29. #29
    Grand Master snowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    14,553
    Presumably there was more than one buyer prepared to bid nearly this much or it wouldn't have sold for so much.

    Sounds a crazy amount of money for a watch to me, but then all my worldly possessions don't come near to half that much, so it's hard for me to judge.

    If two people really want something and have enough cash, we'll see these crazy prices and as one sells for such prices, there will be expectations on future sales and it will spiral upwards until the market runs out of well-heeled individuals prepared to spend colossal amounts of money to possess things with little intrinsic value.

    My advice, wait for Eddie's homage

    M.
    Breitling Cosmonaute 809 - What's not to like?

  30. #30
    Master studly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    2,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamanic View Post
    Nice - but $1m nice???
    Definitely not.

    Sometimes when i see these prices i wonder if it is a scam, like there is no actual real buyer. Then it goes for sale again and some mug thinks to themselves "Well it sold for 1million last time so i'll make my maximum bid 1.2million this time". The truth being it is hardly worth 1/10th of the selling price.
    Last edited by studly; 12th November 2013 at 14:24.

  31. #31
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mostly Germany
    Posts
    17,392
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim W View Post
    This is mad. It just proves that the ultra rich can be ultra stupid.
    Well, not really, on two counts. For the buyer, or the buyer's company, this is an investment that will probably pay off if he disposes of the asset at the right time. Secondly, for the seriously rich, this will be nothing like as arduous as a hard-pressed, hard-taxed midde-classer buying his first new Rolex from a shop and hoping the wife doesn't find out the price.

    Anyone know who the buyer was/buyers were?
    Last edited by andrew; 12th November 2013 at 18:26.
    ...but what do I know; I don't even like watches!

  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    1,689
    quite a high price.

  33. #33
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    NorthEast, UK
    Posts
    85
    Lovely watch but that is just madness

  34. #34
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    denmark
    Posts
    545
    What a joke. No watch is worth that imo

  35. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Spain
    Posts
    23,658
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jazzman View Post
    What a joke. No watch is worth that imo
    He is not paying for the wátch
    and perceived value has no ceiling.

  36. #36
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Leamington
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Huertecilla View Post
    He is not paying for the wátch
    and perceived value has no ceiling.
    Absolutely agree.

    With the news of the most expensive painting ever being sold at £89m - most expensive recorded sale - breaking this morning, it's clear that "tangibles" and just straight up "nice things" are catching the eye of the uber wealthy.

    I echo the comments of Huertecilla that this might not be a bubble, if we look at the markets coming on stream for things like watches, paintings, classics.

    Makes it more difficult for us enthusiasts to bag the watches we yearn for, of course, if this upward trajectory of prices continues.

    Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24922106

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information