Bonkers. In addition, would the engravings prevent the owner from getting the watch serviced by Rolex, in a similar way to them refusing to service my mother in laws datejust because she had a diamond bezel fixed to it?
Watches of Knightsbridge have a new auction catalogue just out, of which the front cover features the latest model Ex II, with SAS engravings.. estimate states 20-30 grand
I know some vintage mil watches command a big premium, but is this really worth that much coin??
Catalogue is here..
http://content.yudu.com/Library/A29x...20th-July-2013
Screengrab..
Bonkers. In addition, would the engravings prevent the owner from getting the watch serviced by Rolex, in a similar way to them refusing to service my mother in laws datejust because she had a diamond bezel fixed to it?
I do rather enjoy watching a Walt getting it up the Johnson...
Thats just silly. Whats stopping me take mine down to the engravers and getting that done.
Crazy money. Whats the relevance of the engraving? I doubt the SAS go around advertising their job role! Its the type of thing I would have worn down the nightclubs in the 90's to impress the ladies!!
I'll think of something cutting to say later - right now I can't stop laughing
Gray
Whoever buys that must've had a large bang on the head!
Lothario Tips: Vol. 1 Chapter 1
"Look at that chap."
"Which one?"
"The one behind me with the suit shorts, corduroy jacket, glasses and the 60" waist."
"Yes?"
"He's special."
"I can see that."
"Seriously - he's special. Well, Special Forces."
"Yes, clearly."
"He must be - it says so on his watch."
"Why didn't you say - let's go and chat to him."
I say good on the lad selling this - assuming he really is SAS, then he has dedicated his life and suffered bloody hard in his years with the forces, and if he can make a few bob out of it so some yuppie can have an "SAS Explorer II", then good on him.
Probably one of a number ordered together as a group buy. I know other special forces groups have had similar things done but with a standard submariner. I believe they have to be ordered through an AD with a minimum order number before Rolex will agree to it. My understanding is that they don't do it very often but it is done.
Why would the SAS want a huge bright shiney thing on their wrists when sneaking around some foreign war zone?
They dont.
Hugely speculative guide price - it's never going to get that IMO.
When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........
Director Special Forces would never have sanctionned this.
Never.
The case back can be engraved on watches which stay at home, but that's only with DSF's blessing. This one has the motto around the case side, which is the giveaway it's a Kinder Surprise special,
Funnily enugh if your recruitment process insists on individuals having absolutely no specific identifiable markings (tatoos, moles, birthmarks etc), the idea that it's cricket to draw attention to yourself with a "flash watch" (which a Rolex is) with this on is laughable.
Was it an issued watch?
If so then, yep no problem.
This one is a 'unit purchase' which basically is a few guys have got together and bought the watches and had them engraved. (apologies if you already knew that). There have been a couple of Breitlings floating around of a similar genre.
When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........
My understanding is that if you want a Rolex supplied engraved watch then you have to approach Rolex via an AD with your request. It is considered and may be granted. They don't grant all requests and I would suggest that only certain units or regiments are approved.
However there is nothing to stop anybody taking a watch to a local engraver and having whatever they want engraved on the back.
It's clearly arse. Everyone knows that the SAS wear JLC ultrathins.
"Bite my shiny metal ass."
- Bender Bending Rodríguez
But you have to hand it to him - COMPLETELY incorrect! This guy goes in 100%
Ive never understood the special forces watch thing - it always seems very Walter Mitty to me - sure there have been a few watches issued to the SAS and SBS - the Omega seamaster and planet ocean being two well-documented examples, but the fact seems to be that the guys who actually serve in the regiments don't actually hold them in much esteem, preferring to flog them on to the kind of mug who had an action man as a child and never quite stopped playing soldier!
Last edited by Umbongo; 5th July 2013 at 21:49.
It's not just a Special Forces thing, there are a lot of military watches. The SF just have the most mystique and therefore garner the most interest, and there are people that seem happy to pay massively over the odds to own them. I don't really get it, the SF editions of Breitling, Omega and Rolex just aren't that interesting in terms of design, the Rolex is especially cheesy with that engraving. I'd rather have my Chinook Bremont, much more exclusive.........
Does this make it a "tactical" Rolex I wonder?
I've never got the whole military watch thing. If you've served in a particular unit then fair play, wear it with pride. For somebody to buy it and play billy big bollocks I find a little sad. It's like those middle managers that turn up to a paintball event dressed like Arnie from Predator, it doesn't mean your some grizzled veteran. It means your a twat.
Strictly my opinion of course....
Allegedly
A unit purchase is the unit firstly agreeing a purchase within the unit, then clearing the purchase with DSF (who does sanction this sort of thing), then negotiating with Rolex, Omega, Brietling etc etc. Finally purchasing then selling to members of the unit in a manner that ensures each sale is recorded. Documentation is passed to the unit member which proves authenticity. It is never the intention for the watch to worn on operations rather it is meant to be a keepsake.
This has happened a number of times and there a few different sales of watches within the UKSF units the link below mentions an SRR one, which is stamped with the unit capbadge rather than the engraved item in the OP.
http://www.chrono24.com/en/rolex/ss-...num=5&tab=pics
There are rules that apply to serving members as far as re-sale is concerned, but these are impossible to enforce once the individual moves on. I always thought it ironic that the unit claims the watches are for members to have as mementos and not for resale and then issues a letter that says the adjutant of SAS/SBS/SRR confirms the authenticity of the watch and that the person buying it originally served with that unit. If there is to be no resale why do you need this?
No idea if this one or the one in the link above are genuine BTW but just thought I would chuck my ha'penny in. Even less idea why you would want one if you never served in the unit but there is a whole industry supplying walt's with UKSF crap so there does seem to be a demand.
Best
Den
That watch, I know for a fact, has been up Randy McNab's bum.
some rolex alway get silly money and ive no doubt this will go the same way tho to me its markings mean nothing more than a watch that has say '25 years employment at cadburys ' engraved on the back , ive no doubt some muppet will pay it tho.
I can understand the appeal of rare military Submariners etc that were ordered from Rolex officially by the British army.
But I assume this Explorer was simply engraved by the soldier who owns it - in which case surely it's not really worth hardly any more than a standard version. If it sells well though then maybe the vendor can get a few more engraved,
can't blame him.......a fool and his money are easily parted
£20 - £30k My arse. This one is £10 including postage. I'm thinking of buying it to wear down the pub next time I tell my "second on the balcony" story whilst giving the thousand yard stare.
Id say it doesn't matter who ordered the watch. Its a rolex explorer and, as such, is worth as much as any other rolex explorer - except to the idiot willing to perpetuate the b*llsh*t by paying more.
I understand the mentality behind the collecting of military watches, but that's not to say I see it as in any way logical - its usually a compulsion rather than a decision.
People who collect a thing because its rare generally miss much of the joy of actually liking it!
However, people who would buy a watch, or anything, because of some tie-in with the special forces - well - that's just a bit sad.
Last edited by Umbongo; 6th July 2013 at 10:51.
Of course it matters who ordered the watch. It's called provenance. If there was documentation to prove the head of the special forces had a Rolex
engraved to mark a special occasion it would be worth far more than the same watch that a soldier dropped off at his local engraver to have
'who dares wins' written on it.
I know one guy who serves in the SAS and have a close friend who although only a para, worked very closely with the sf for a good while and it seems they actually have less restrictions on the way they look than infantrymen and the like. Whilst in Afghanistan it was difficult to tell the difference between locals and these guys because they all had long beards for example, and whilst serving at home would keep their long hair if they wanted to.
I do however agree that it would be unlikely for any of them to want to draw attention to the fact they were sf though.
Graham haven't 'jumped the shark'. They dived in with it on day one. Rather than offering a well designed, desirable watch. They've attached themselves to absolutely anything; RAF/Army/Navy, Guy Martin TT Races, F1 with Mercedes GP etc. They're the watch equivalent to a Z list celebrity who'll turn up at the opening of an envelope....
Back to the OP, who know's what it'll make. A few Pro Hunters made good money against estimates at Christies Hong Kong last Spring....