closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 131

Thread: Ceramic Nightmare

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,842

    Ceramic Nightmare

    Just spotted this over on another forum, dropped from waist high!

    RIAC

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    6,728
    I wouldn't like the repair bill!

  3. #3
    Grand Master seikopath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    29,758
    nothing a bit of polywatch wouldnt sort out
    Good luck everybody. Have a good one.

  4. #4
    Craftsman canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    671
    Ceramic cases may be much cheaper to produce... but they sure as heck are not going to be able to withstand a drop or a knock. I do hope the industry does not move away from metals.

  5. #5
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield
    Posts
    1,802
    Wait. Ceramic is cheaper to produce? So why do ceramic dialed watches command such high premiums?

  6. #6
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Zakynthos, Greece
    Posts
    6,969
    Blog Entries
    1
    Ceramic is known to be hard and therefore it will be brittle. From the Panerai stable anyway, it makes their composite models all the more attractive.

    Sympathy for the owner of that one though, a very big ouch.

  7. #7
    Craftsman canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by chicaneuk View Post
    Wait. Ceramic is cheaper to produce? So why do ceramic dialed watches command such high premiums?
    Ceramic cases will be predominately china clay based... That costs about £6 for a 20 kilo bag at retail. Eddie would know better than myself but how much do you expect 20 kilos of stainless steel to cost... Im guessing a lot more than a fiver with change. I suspect the high price is due to it being 'the new thing'. So my statement is basically based on cost of raw materials. They will have added a few binding ingredients and probably some fine fibre to more readily smooth things out and to add a bit of strength... But its not beyond something that any secondary school tech class couldn't handle....if they had a big press to compress the clay.
    Last edited by canuck; 24th May 2013 at 17:32.

  8. #8
    Craftsman cinnabull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Warrington, centre of the Universe and home of the Mighty Wire
    Posts
    820
    You'd like to think they were covered on their owners household insurance. I know mine are, makes a lot of sense really when accidents like this are just waiting to happen.

    Stuart

  9. #9
    Master seffrican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    2,471
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by canuck View Post
    Ceramic cases will be predominately china clay based... That costs about £6 for a 20 kilo bag at retail. Eddie would know better than myself but how much do you expect 20 kilos of stainless steel to cost... Im guessing a lot more than a fiver with change. I suspect the high price is due to it being 'the new thing'. So my statement is basically based on cost of raw materials. They will have added a few binding ingredients and probably some fine fibre to more readily smooth things out and to add a bit of strength... But its not beyond something that any secondary school tech class couldn't handle....if they had a big press to compress the clay.
    The raw material costs have only a tiny impact on the manufactured costs, which have only the tiniest impact on the retail prices.

    --Edit--

    At current commodity prices, 20 kg of 316 stainless would cost you less than $50.
    Last edited by seffrican; 24th May 2013 at 17:49. Reason: Added info

  10. #10
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by seffrican View Post
    The raw material costs have only a tiny impact on the manufactured costs, which have only the tiniest impact on the retail prices.
    You did read my bit on how ceramic cases aren't actually made from clay, right?

    Regards,
    Adam

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by chicaneuk View Post
    Wait. Ceramic is cheaper to produce? So why do ceramic dialed watches command such high premiums?
    Ceramic's one of the "buzz words" of the moment, and people who buy expensive watches generally love a good buzz word!
    And raw material costs, whether higher or lower, are irrelevant to the price charged by the watch houses.
    Luxury watches are not in any way priced with any kind of good value for money in mind - their manufacturers leave it to the more gullible of us to convince ourselves of that!
    The rest of us just bend over and take our medicine - that's the hobby!

  12. #12
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    697
    Wow I had no idea ceramic could just shatter from what sounds like not a high fall! Definitely a SS guy!

  13. #13
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    3,186
    Ouch is all I can say for the poor watch and wallet likewise. Ceramic looks really nice however I'll stick with ceramic inserts for now.

  14. #14
    Master gregory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Riding the railroad like a hobo.....
    Posts
    2,950
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by chicaneuk View Post
    Wait. Ceramic is cheaper to produce? So why do ceramic dialed watches command such high premiums?



    Because they can. ;)

  15. #15
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by canuck View Post
    I do hope the industry does not move away from metals.
    I agree. The correct movement would be towards increasingly better case hardening methods. Unfortunately, it seems that only the niche brands care about this sort of thing. Though, I guess, Omega is somewhat on board with their grade 5 Ti on the newer blue Liquid Metal POs.

    It seems as if the better manufactures saw all the ugly low end PVD watches and said, "hey lets make a watch just as ugly, 10 times more expensive, and way less durable". Sign me up guys!

  16. #16
    Master MerlinShepherd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex
    Posts
    3,546
    I quite like it. It's what I would call proper WABI.

    Seriously though, what a horrible thing to happen. The owner must be gutted beyond imagination.

  17. #17
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    5,935
    Quote Originally Posted by MerlinShepherd View Post
    I quite like it. It's what I would call proper WABI.

    Seriously though, what a horrible thing to happen. The owner must be gutted beyond imagination.
    Lol!

    Comiserations to the owner, I must admit I was always a little worried about something like this when I had the DSSD.

  18. #18
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Warwickshire
    Posts
    2,307
    One reason I would never buy a ceramic watch, the cost to replace the case will be horrendously expensive.

  19. #19
    Ouch! Bad days.

  20. #20
    Grand Master TheFlyingBanana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bedfordshire and your back garden
    Posts
    23,209
    Ceramic watches hold virtually zero interest for me. As far as I am concerned, it is not much different to a plastic watch. Same goes for carbon fibre efforts.
    So clever my foot fell off.

  21. #21
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by JeremyO View Post
    One reason I would never buy a ceramic watch, the cost to replace the case will be horrendously expensive.
    Indeed. When the little ceramic bezel insert on a Sub costs around $1,000 to replace, can you imagine what a case would cost?

  22. #22
    Master Dr.Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    California dreamin'
    Posts
    1,002
    Quote Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
    Indeed. When the little ceramic bezel insert on a Sub costs around $1,000 to replace, can you imagine what a case would cost?
    The repair estimate is $8,700.
    Cheap indeed.

  23. #23
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,392
    Quote Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
    The correct movement would be towards increasingly better case hardening methods. Unfortunately, it seems that only the niche brands care about this sort of thing. Though, I guess, Omega is somewhat on board with their grade 5 Ti on the newer blue Liquid Metal POs.
    +1. This should be exactly the way to go.

    The major Japanese brands have cottoned on, i.e. Seiko Dia-Shield and Citizen Duratect, plus Sinn with its tegimented models, Bremont and Damasko. If British, German and Japanese brands have hardened watch cases, why haven't the Swiss bothered? Let's hope that Omega's hard Ti is the start of better watch cases from the Swiss.

  24. #24
    Looks like the material isn't really 'fit for purpose' - steel cases are stronger, and plastic g shocks don't fail like this.

  25. #25
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    5,053
    ceramic watches will wear a hell of a lot better than steel apart from someone dropping them onto a hard surface, which isnt all that clever no matter what material your watch is made of

  26. #26
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,842
    Very true the ceramic has shattered but steel would have got a nasty ding (maybe) but the steel would still be highly wearable whereas the Ceramic is somewhat written off! Im not a massive fan, I like them for what they are but dont think Id ever commit to buy and this adds weight to my thought process
    RIAC

  27. #27
    hmm...makes me think twice about a ceramic speedy aka dark side of the moon...

  28. #28
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    1,960
    Saw this happen with a ceramic Hublot.

    In fairness to Hublot, JC Biver saw the photo and replaced the case. Be a lot easier if it didn't happen though.

  29. #29
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by 100thmonkey View Post
    Very true the ceramic has shattered but steel would have got a nasty ding (maybe) but the steel would still be highly wearable whereas the Ceramic is somewhat written off! Im not a massive fan, I like them for what they are but dont think Id ever commit to buy and this adds weight to my thought process
    It seems like aesthetics over function - which is a bit weird for watches like the PAM and IWC which at least have their roots as so called 'tool' watches. Some of them do look good, but I couldn't have a watch that couldn't survive a knock against a bar counter.

    John

  30. #30
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Glasgow, UK
    Posts
    368
    My take on this issue is that for normal wear ceramics will hold up better than steel by being virtually sctratchproof , but that if you get careless then disaster beckons. I hate dings etc. on a watch and would have to replace anyway. A lot of the costs of watch part replacement seem have little to with actual component costs but are mostly a "luxury tax" based on the costs of the retail model.

  31. #31
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    biddulph moor
    Posts
    564
    Up until the start of the month I worked for a large engineering ceramics company specialising in technical ceramics. (Zirconia, alumina,silicon nitride etc)

    We made many engineering components and also other bits and pieces.

    I personally quoted parts for a few large watch and mobile phone manufactures but was always declined due to our prices being too high, they would rather pay cheap Chinese prices.

    Zirconium oxide is an expensive raw material bought in from Japan or Australia, we were paying around £70 per kilo.

    Each part starts off as powder which is isostatically pressed into a billet, this billet has to be much larger than the finished componant as when fired for up to a week the part will shrink up to 25% in each direction.

    The part then has to be finished using diamond tooling and polishing wheels.

    If designed and made properly the parts should not chip or shatter.

    Many parts I have sold are used down hole in oil applications and are subjected to thousands of impacts under heat and pressure.

  32. #32
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SE
    Posts
    3,412
    Quote Originally Posted by ac82 View Post
    Up until the start of the month I worked for a large engineering ceramics company specialising in technical ceramics. (Zirconia, alumina,silicon nitride etc)

    We made many engineering components and also other bits and pieces.

    I personally quoted parts for a few large watch and mobile phone manufactures but was always declined due to our prices being too high, they would rather pay cheap Chinese prices.

    Zirconium oxide is an expensive raw material bought in from Japan or Australia, we were paying around £70 per kilo.

    Each part starts off as powder which is isostatically pressed into a billet, this billet has to be much larger than the finished componant as when fired for up to a week the part will shrink up to 25% in each direction.

    The part then has to be finished using diamond tooling and polishing wheels.

    If designed and made properly the parts should not chip or shatter.

    Many parts I have sold are used down hole in oil applications and are subjected to thousands of impacts under heat and pressure.
    So in essence, IWC buy their cases from Guangdong...? wouldnt surprise me one bit. Always been weary of IWC, bit of a crap brand tbh.

  33. #33
    Master
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI USA
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by 744ER View Post
    So in essence, IWC buy their cases from Guangdong...? wouldnt surprise me one bit. Always been weary of IWC, bit of a crap brand tbh.
    I doubt China had yet stolen the intellectual property required for this sort of thing when IWC released their first ceramic watch (the 3705 in 1994). There's no doubt that the cheap, flat looking, and unattractive case on that new Tudor comes from the country of "imported".

  34. #34
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Aberdoom
    Posts
    1,267
    Quote Originally Posted by JP Chestnut View Post
    I doubt China had yet stolen the intellectual property required for this sort of thing when IWC released their first ceramic watch (the 3705 in 1994). There's no doubt that the cheap, flat looking, and unattractive case on that new Tudor comes from the country of "imported".
    "China" is perfectly able to manufacture ceramic watch cases and parts, but I doubt that Tudor import their ceramic cases from there.

  35. #35
    Master senraw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Gisleham
    Posts
    6,234
    Think i'll stick to Steel and Titanium.

    I'd much rather have a few scratches and dings than a broken watch case.

  36. #36
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    County Durham
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by senraw View Post
    Think i'll stick to Steel and Titanium.

    I'd much rather have a few scratches and dings than a broken watch case.
    Same here, I love the new speedy but price and this thread put me off

  37. #37
    Grand Master Chris_in_the_UK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norf Yorks
    Posts
    43,026
    Quote Originally Posted by 744ER View Post
    So in essence, IWC buy their cases from Guangdong...? wouldnt surprise me one bit. Always been weary of IWC, bit of a crap brand tbh.
    And this is based on?
    When you look long into an abyss, the abyss looks long into you.........

  38. #38
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by 744ER View Post
    So in essence, IWC buy their cases from Guangdong...? wouldnt surprise me one bit. Always been weary of IWC, bit of a crap brand tbh.
    Yeah, care to explain how you came to that conclusion?

    As for your "crap brand" comment, well, everyone's entitled to their opinion, I 'spose.

    Regards,
    Adam

    PS - Are you weary of IWC or wary of IWC? Both, maybe?

  39. #39
    Master adesmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    2,483
    Ouch ceramic is expensive.

    My Ploprof cost £900 for a new bezel after it shattered.


  40. #40
    Master Lammylee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    2,981
    Quote Originally Posted by adesmith View Post
    Ouch ceramic is expensive.

    My Ploprof cost £900 for a new bezel after it shattered.
    My Ocean 7 meteor ceramic cost £600 for the whole watch, if I smash it I'll just get a new one.
    Last edited by Lammylee; 25th May 2013 at 00:16.

  41. #41
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ascot, Berkshire, U.K.
    Posts
    1,014
    That's why watches should be made out of steel.

  42. #42
    Master Tony-GB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    3,724
    These are just the emperor's new clothes. Do PP use ceramic cases? It's only certain brands trying to create a new niche to generate a buzz.

    Stick to the tried & tested metals & you can't go wrong. I remember reading about a Risti complaining that his watch changed colour because it absorbed the alchohol from his bloodstream through his skin!

    I can only see the resale value of ceramic watches going one way, and it ain't north!

  43. #43
    And this thread has crossed off buying any ceramic watches for me

  44. #44
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    LONDON
    Posts
    273
    No Ceramic case for me thanks!
    Ouch!

  45. #45
    Master golfg60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    2,798
    Blog Entries
    13
    It's def put me off ceramic lol

  46. #46
    Craftsman Foucault717's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    413
    I'm sure ceramic is fine and tough enough for daily life in non-extreme conditions but still it always made me feel uneasy. Maybe I'm old fashioned or ignorant but steel is steel. I don't want a pottery watch.

  47. #47
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Foucault717 View Post
    I'm sure ceramic is fine and tough enough for daily life in non-extreme conditions but still it always made me feel uneasy. Maybe I'm old fashioned or ignorant but steel is steel. I don't want a pottery watch.
    The only ignorant aspect of your statement is making a comparison to pottery, since we've already throughly debunked that aspect of the ceramic myth.

    Looks like we might still have a ways to go with the "if-I-so-much-as-look-at-it-funny-it'll-shatter" crowd, though, but hey, you can lead a horse to water, you just can't make it drink.

    Regards,
    Adam

  48. #48
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    22,519
    Quote Originally Posted by craniotes View Post
    Yeah, care to explain how you came to that conclusion?

    As for your "crap brand" comment, well, everyone's entitled to their opinion, I 'spose.

    Regards,
    Adam

    PS - Are you weary of IWC or wary of IWC? Both, maybe?
    744ER is a watch repairer so I think he's likely to have grounds for maligning IWC.

    As for the ceramic watch dilemma, I wouldn't spend a lot on one. My missus has a couple of Armani ceramics, not my choice but she likes 'em.

    Not sure how to refinish the bezel on the latest Seamaster Pro and Planet Ocean. I guess the bezel insert can be popped out, but it's a brave man who'll do this. On the old models, I take the insert out every time I refinish one and it's an easy task. Wouldn`t fancy cracking the latest type and having to stump up for a replacement!

    Paul

  49. #49
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    1,097
    Crickey....enough to put anyone off a ceramic for life

  50. #50
    Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    2,626
    Interesting thread, I recently bought this NOS 1969 Omega Skywlker, no ceramic but a tungsten bombarded vickers 1200 steel case, when I got it it had a tiny chip bottom right edge and top left edge, both less than the size of a pin head but probably from when it was miss handled in the shop or knocked hence it never sold as new!








    On my previous skywalker it rolled literally out of the watch box on to a vintage glass haberdashery cabinet and chipped the case at 6 oclock and a 2mm chunk chipped and fell off the tungsten! that wasnt a good day! the vickers (like ceramic) is extremely scratch resistant but very brittle like ceramic cases but on these is compounded because it is a coating

    CheersTom
    Last edited by dickstar1977; 1st March 2014 at 11:10.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information