closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 45 of 45

Thread: Which would you keep and why??

  1. #1
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Sussex, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    7,978

    Which would you keep and why??

    I normally dont like the "which watch should I buy" threads cos I think likes and dislikes are so personal. However, I am in a dilemma (nothing strange for me...) about these two. One has to go for financial reasons, but which one should I let go?? I love them both and whichever one goes I'll pine for it. I am interested in your opinions here :?

    Not my Pic Steinhart Ocean One Ceramic Bezel Auto


    or
    My Pic Famed PRS3 Original Quartz (10 year Battery Life, Sapphire Crystal) Virtually Mint

  2. #2

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd keep the PRS-3, because it's a brilliant watch that would be hard to replace.
    Andy

    Wanted - Damasko DC57

  3. #3
    Master trisdg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,883

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Definitely the PRS-3. Looks in great condition too.

  4. #4
    Master Omegary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    8,841

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    The Steinhart will be easy to replace once funds permit, the PRS-3 won't, so keep the latter.

    Cheers,
    Gary

  5. #5
    Master kungfugerbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Whitby (not the one in Ontario)
    Posts
    6,838

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Yup, no brainer to me too. Keep the PRS. Much more special.

  6. #6
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South East, UK
    Posts
    302

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by Omegary
    The Steinhart will be easy to replace once funds permit, the PRS-3 won't, so keep the latter.

    Cheers,
    Gary
    +1 :)

  7. #7

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonimouse
    Quote Originally Posted by Omegary
    The Steinhart will be easy to replace once funds permit, the PRS-3 won't, so keep the latter.

    Cheers,
    Gary
    +1 :)
    +2 (and i prefer the looks of the PRS3)

    Andy

  8. #8
    Master luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Buggersdale, Nr Leeds
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd keep them both because I can afford it, but if you decide to sell the Steinhart drop me apm. :mrgreen:
    I'm just a very naughty boy.

    Good deals with- VINSTINK, kevkojak, Optimum, Omegary, seikoking, acg, SPEEDY, kfman, Card Shark, wajhart, Jot, danboy, zenomega, gaz64, minke, Mal52, Alas, norfolkngood, Sparky, rdwiow, mrteatime, gravedodger, joeytheghost, lordoftheflies, Silver Hawk, Filterlab, brooksy, marmisto, Fray Bentos, Bootsy, Harvey69, Mantisgb, bristolboozer, Jedadiah, newtohorology, Zephod, jimm1, Draygo, Raptor.

    I may have forgot one or two, apppologies.

  9. #9
    Master darrenw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    2,807

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd keep the auto, because it's an auto.

    The PRS3 is quite a looker, but if I was only going to have one watch (not sure if that's the case for you), it would have to be a mechanical.

  10. #10
    Thomas Reid
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    20,326

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    The first one, because it is a "professional", as noted on the dial.

    Best wishes,
    Bob

  11. #11
    Master blackal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Scottish Borders
    Posts
    9,520

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Get rid of the uppermost.............

    Most people will get a quick glance of it and say "Ooh - a Rolex! is it real?" :?

    (of course, if Rolex copied them - then it is worth keeping)

    A

  12. #12
    Master village's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Any further south and i would have wet feet
    Posts
    9,959

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    As said,sell the Steinhart and keep the PRS as it's harder to replace (and the Steinhart has a cyclops :evil: )

  13. #13

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by andy tims
    I'd keep the PRS-3, because it's a brilliant watch that would be hard to replace.
    +1 How easy it is to replace a watch is a good thing to take into account.

  14. #14
    Master Routers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northampton, UK
    Posts
    2,272

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Steinhart to go, no contest.

  15. #15
    Craftsman Blackhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    St. Albans, Hertfordshire, UK
    Posts
    428

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Keep the PRS-3!

  16. #16

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    :D Keep the PRS3, its would be hard to get another if you wanted to replace it, and its fantastic.

  17. #17
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    UK -> USA
    Posts
    665

    Which would you keep and why??

    Prs-3, for the same reasons as above. Lovely watch!

  18. #18

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Don't like the Steinhart. Trying to be something it's not. The PRS-3 is honest and slightly lovely

  19. #19
    Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Sussex, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    7,978

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Well, that seems pretty straight forward!!! :lol:

  20. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,383

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Another nail in the coffin for the wannabe Rolex, from me...

  21. #21
    Craftsman loqv75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brussels & B'ham
    Posts
    790

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    The Prs because it is more original not like these Sublikes

  22. #22

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    If you decide on selling the PRS-3 please drop me a PM.

    I suppose for that reason I'd have to say keep the Steinhart :)

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    2,932

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by andy tims
    I'd keep the PRS-3, because it's a brilliant watch that would be hard to replace.
    +1, the Steinhart isn't as great IMHO.

  24. #24

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    PRS3 would be a keeper - I don't like the other one ;)
    It's just a matter of time...

  25. #25

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Sell the steinhart defiantly

  26. #26

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Keep the PRS sell the Steinhart but that is as I am not a fan of them.

  27. #27
    Master luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Buggersdale, Nr Leeds
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Yeah, sell the Steinhart.

    (To me) :o :lol:
    I'm just a very naughty boy.

    Good deals with- VINSTINK, kevkojak, Optimum, Omegary, seikoking, acg, SPEEDY, kfman, Card Shark, wajhart, Jot, danboy, zenomega, gaz64, minke, Mal52, Alas, norfolkngood, Sparky, rdwiow, mrteatime, gravedodger, joeytheghost, lordoftheflies, Silver Hawk, Filterlab, brooksy, marmisto, Fray Bentos, Bootsy, Harvey69, Mantisgb, bristolboozer, Jedadiah, newtohorology, Zephod, jimm1, Draygo, Raptor.

    I may have forgot one or two, apppologies.

  28. #28

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    It pains me to say it (as I've been looking for one for over two years) but keep the PRS3. The Steinhart is easily replaceable, the PRS3 is irreplaceable. However, if you do decide to sell the PRS3, please add me to the list of potential buyers

  29. #29
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    oxford
    Posts
    1,191

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    definitley keep the precista, much nicer watch imo

  30. #30
    Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,830

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    PRS3 for me. Certainly a more individual looking timepiece with a charm that isn't so derivative.

  31. #31
    Grand Master gray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    New Brighton
    Posts
    11,555

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd keep the PRS because the Steinhart sucks (you did ask)
    Gray

  32. #32
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    UK -> USA
    Posts
    665

    Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by gray
    I'd keep the PRS because the Steinhart sucks (you did ask)
    :lol: :lol:

    Nothing like a bit of honesty.

  33. #33
    Master luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Buggersdale, Nr Leeds
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by tricktock
    Quote Originally Posted by gray
    I'd keep the PRS because the Steinhart sucks (you did ask)
    :lol: :lol:

    Nothing like a bit of honesty.
    And that was nothing like it. :mrgreen:

    On a serious note though, why all the Steinhart bashing? :roll:

    I own a Steinhart Ocean One GMT and the quality is up there with my 16610 . :)

    The timekeeping is as well. :blackeye:
    I'm just a very naughty boy.

    Good deals with- VINSTINK, kevkojak, Optimum, Omegary, seikoking, acg, SPEEDY, kfman, Card Shark, wajhart, Jot, danboy, zenomega, gaz64, minke, Mal52, Alas, norfolkngood, Sparky, rdwiow, mrteatime, gravedodger, joeytheghost, lordoftheflies, Silver Hawk, Filterlab, brooksy, marmisto, Fray Bentos, Bootsy, Harvey69, Mantisgb, bristolboozer, Jedadiah, newtohorology, Zephod, jimm1, Draygo, Raptor.

    I may have forgot one or two, apppologies.

  34. #34
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    UK -> USA
    Posts
    665

    Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by luddite
    Quote Originally Posted by tricktock
    Quote Originally Posted by gray
    I'd keep the PRS because the Steinhart sucks (you did ask)
    :lol: :lol:

    Nothing like a bit of honesty.
    And that was nothing like it. :mrgreen:

    On a serious note though, why all the Steinhart bashing? :roll:

    I own a Steinhart Ocean One GMT and the quality is up there with my 16610 . :)

    The timekeeping is as well. :blackeye:
    I have nothing against them - I would still take the prs-3 though. The word honesty was used, not saying I agree with the honesty ;)

    I'd be lying if I said I wasn't surprise by your statement on quality though. Begs the question, why do you own the Rolex if the quality and timekeeping are "up there" on the steinhart?

  35. #35
    Master raysablade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    5,070

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by pluseditor
    PRS3 for me.
    I don't disagree but........

    Quote Originally Posted by pluseditor
    Certainly a more individual looking timepiece with a charm that isn't so derivative.



    Strikes me that, for similar money, an issued CWC offers the something extra that the excellent Steinhart and Broadarrow suggest, but can't deliver.

  36. #36

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd get rid of the micky mouse Rolex look-a-likey and keep the other one :)

  37. #37
    Grand Master Dave+63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    15,908

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    I'd probably get rid of the Steinhart for the reasons already given but I do think it's a nicer looking watch than the PRS3 IMHO.

    dave

  38. #38
    Master luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Buggersdale, Nr Leeds
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Because I want to. :mrgreen:

    I own around 80 wrist watches and the 16610 just happens to be one of them. :wink:
    Quote Originally Posted by tricktock
    Quote Originally Posted by luddite
    Quote Originally Posted by tricktock
    Quote Originally Posted by gray
    I'd keep the PRS because the Steinhart sucks (you did ask)
    :lol: :lol:

    Nothing like a bit of honesty.
    And that was nothing like it. :mrgreen:

    On a serious note though, why all the Steinhart bashing? :roll:

    I own a Steinhart Ocean One GMT and the quality is up there with my 16610 . :)

    The timekeeping is as well. :blackeye:
    I have nothing against them - I would still take the prs-3 though. The word honesty was used, not saying I agree with the honesty ;)

    I'd be lying if I said I wasn't surprise by your statement on quality though. Begs the question, why do you own the Rolex if the quality and timekeeping are "up there" on the steinhart?
    I'm just a very naughty boy.

    Good deals with- VINSTINK, kevkojak, Optimum, Omegary, seikoking, acg, SPEEDY, kfman, Card Shark, wajhart, Jot, danboy, zenomega, gaz64, minke, Mal52, Alas, norfolkngood, Sparky, rdwiow, mrteatime, gravedodger, joeytheghost, lordoftheflies, Silver Hawk, Filterlab, brooksy, marmisto, Fray Bentos, Bootsy, Harvey69, Mantisgb, bristolboozer, Jedadiah, newtohorology, Zephod, jimm1, Draygo, Raptor.

    I may have forgot one or two, apppologies.

  39. #39
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    UK -> USA
    Posts
    665

    Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by luddite
    Because I want to. :mrgreen:
    :lol: I can't argue with that

    :D

  40. #40
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Heemskerk, The Netherlands
    Posts
    459

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    PRS-3 as the Steinhart to me just screams "HOMMAGE" and therefore isn't very original to me.

  41. #41
    Journeyman Drum2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sunny Herne Hill, London
    Posts
    191

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Homage is a show or demonstration of respect or dedication to someone or something. Nothing wrong with that.

    I personally love Steinhart watches and have three of them at present. Outstanding build quality and outstanding value for money. You don't have to like them but to knock them...?

    Bottom line is if the PRS3 is harder to replace then that is the one to keep. I would find my Ocean One hard to let go though.

  42. #42
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    414

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Just because a particular watch may be more difficult to replace, doesn't mean you'd ever actually WANT to replace it.

    I think the Steinhart is the nicer watch. If you think the same, sell the other one.

  43. #43
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    west midlands,UK.
    Posts
    1,715

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Dont keep the prs, sell it to me :mrgreen: :D

  44. #44

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    PRS

  45. #45
    Master luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Buggersdale, Nr Leeds
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which would you keep and why??

    Quote Originally Posted by tomah
    Just because a particular watch may be more difficult to replace, doesn't mean you'd ever actually WANT to replace it.

    I think the Steinhart is the nicer watch. If you think the same, sell the other one.
    A Mickey Mouse Timex would be more difficult to replace as well. :mrgreen:
    I'm just a very naughty boy.

    Good deals with- VINSTINK, kevkojak, Optimum, Omegary, seikoking, acg, SPEEDY, kfman, Card Shark, wajhart, Jot, danboy, zenomega, gaz64, minke, Mal52, Alas, norfolkngood, Sparky, rdwiow, mrteatime, gravedodger, joeytheghost, lordoftheflies, Silver Hawk, Filterlab, brooksy, marmisto, Fray Bentos, Bootsy, Harvey69, Mantisgb, bristolboozer, Jedadiah, newtohorology, Zephod, jimm1, Draygo, Raptor.

    I may have forgot one or two, apppologies.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information