closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: So a dilemma >>>

  1. #1
    Master SSK007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lancashire UK / Northwest
    Posts
    3,576

    So a dilemma >>>

    3 Divers and the question is which one would you be keeping?

    First of all a family picture of the 3 >>>




    And now the low down from my point of view
    1). The Precista PRS18Q >>



    Looks great and i love the case and boasts a 300M Water Resistance. Looks good on both a Nato and a Bracelet and is very much military based, the only draw back to me is that it is quartz (although i knew this when buying it). I suppose one Con for this watch could be it has no date on it, the lume is also ok. Another good pro for this watch is that it does have a sapphire crystal.

    2). The Seiko SKX007 Automatic Diver



    This is the classic Seiko design of diving watch so no complaints there has a 200M Water Resistance and has the crown at 4 which i particularly like. It doesn't suit all styles of bracelet but it does look good on an oyster style bracelet, i have never tried it on a nato. A bad point i suppose is that this watch does not have a sapphire crystal but i have never had any problems with the Hardlex crystal it has now, and yes i have banged it a few times and has not shown signs of it - so a tough watch all in all. It does have a Day and a Date wheel which i have found very useful for questions like what date is it LOL.

    3). The O&W M4 GMT Diver



    This one again is an Auto which is always a pro for me, the lume is abit poor but it will do. This also has a 200M Water Resistance and does look good on any strap i have tried on it. This also has a date feature and the movement is VERY Accurate - after testing it struggled to gain a second a day which is top dollar in my books. I think possibly because it doesn't have a sapphire and the bezel isn't really a diving style bezel could bring this watch down.


    So what do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Grand Master abraxas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    33,752

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    .
    PRS-18

    john
    THIN is the new BLACK

  3. #3
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Cologne
    Posts
    2,232

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Lovely trio and I would keep them all if possible. They are all different (especially due to their different case shape) and relatively affordable. If needs must, then I would part with the O&W... but then again... :D

  4. #4
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Bucks
    Posts
    461

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    For me, preference in order is

    1. Seiko - classic dive watch and daily beater. Great value
    2. O&W - I really like this watch. Forced into second due to cyclops mainly (I can't help not being drawn to them :cry: )
    3. PRS-18Q - great watch, but in this company the quartz movement ranks it 3rd for me.

    If they were in my cupboard I'd be tempted to keep both the automatics though.

  5. #5
    Master SSK007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lancashire UK / Northwest
    Posts
    3,576

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I think its an automatic advantage to the O&W and the SKX due to the movement :D

    Quote Originally Posted by nellyh
    For me, preference in order is

    1. Seiko - classic dive watch and daily beater. Great value
    2. O&W - I really like this watch. Forced into second due to cyclops mainly (I can't help not being drawn to them :cry: )
    3. PRS-18Q - great watch, but in this company the quartz movement ranks it 3rd for me.

    If they were in my cupboard I'd be tempted to keep both the automatics though.

  6. #6
    Master j0hnbarker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Northerly
    Posts
    2,789

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I really like the Seiko's dial and the fact that it has a day/date wheel. Seems to have a bit more presence than the other two IMO, so that would be top of my list for keeps.

  7. #7
    Grand Master abraxas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    33,752

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    .
    The O&W is generic and you will always be able to get that Seiko. 8)

    john
    THIN is the new BLACK

  8. #8
    Craftsman LVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Posts
    644

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Keep the 18Q please, has the best specs and best looks IMHO.
    Your collection has lots of mechanical power so one Q is allowed :mrgreen:

  9. #9
    Master ghosty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunny London
    Posts
    2,674

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I too would go 18, then o&w, then seiko!

  10. #10
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    320

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I would ditch the Seiko

  11. #11

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Keep the PRS-18.

  12. #12
    Master Henrik Gelardi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denmark, cold north
    Posts
    3,248

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Keep the Precista ...

  13. #13

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    The Seiko stands out amongst those three for me. I'd drop the last one.

  14. #14

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Keep the Seiko. You know that you will miss it:-)

    Jon

  15. #15
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    93

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    In terms of looks the PRS wins comfortably for me, haven't seen many on a bracelet and I think it looks very good, probably better than on NATO.

  16. #16
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    489

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I will keep the O&W. Great daily wearer.

  17. #17
    Master dejjl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Posts
    6,983

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    This order for keeping:

    1. 18Q
    2. Seiko
    3. O&W

  18. #18
    Craftsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    522

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Loose the O&W. Seiko is a great beater. The Precista is like nothing else out there which is a big plus. The O&W hasn't got a lot of identity. It's more of a generic 'Submariner' style dive-watch than the others are.

  19. #19
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North
    Posts
    18,981
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    I like the o&w the most out of the 3.

  20. #20
    Master TakesALickin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, USA
    Posts
    2,343

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    The Seiko you can get anytime, the Precista would always leave me wanting the Benrus Type 1 it's based on. The O&W is different enough from a sub to keep my interest. The bezel can be used for a dive timer if need be, and as an ersatz GMT bezel if you want that function. IIRC, there's lume on the bezel, too. The ETA 2824 hacks, handwinds and is Swiss. It wins going away.

  21. #21

    Re: So a dilemma >>>

    Quote Originally Posted by LVE
    Keep the 18Q please, has the best specs and best looks IMHO.
    Your collection has lots of mechanical power so one Q is allowed :mrgreen:
    + 1 on that. Looks great, has strap / bracelet versatility and the added bonus of being perfect as a grab and go option on rotation with other watches without having to reset the time with it being a quartz and all.

    Andy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information