closing tag is in template navbar
timefactors watches



TZ-UK Fundraiser
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 101 to 108 of 108

Thread: Rolex Seadweller Deepsea Review

  1. #101
    Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    newcastle
    Posts
    3,579

    Re: Rolex Seadweller Deepsea Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 100thmonkey
    Quote Originally Posted by rossylad92
    brilliant review and pictures!!

    did you pay for it all in one go? or in monthly installments?

    how much did it cost you if you dont mind me asking.. 8)
    Crude Question but Current retail is 7100 with an imminant price rise to close to 8k we think!
    8k :shock: christ

  2. #102

    Re: Rolex Seadweller Deepsea Review

    After much deliberating I've finally took the plunge on a 2010 DSSD. Having worn a 16610 Sub for 5 or 6 years initially the DSSD does feel a little large on my wrist - I have big wrists it is quite snug on it's biggest setting - it's the height more than anything but after 5 days it's becoming less noticable. The bracelet taper is not an issue with it wearing quite tight on me so no canting as has been reported elsewhere. Hadn't realised till I re read this review that I have a Series 1 - will this be good or bad in years to come? My only dislike and it is a very minor one is the domed crystal, one thing I like about the Sub is that it hardly picks up reflections and most of the time it's as if there is no crystal there at all - the DSSD's domed crystal doesn't show off the dial as well IMO.

  3. #103

    Re: Rolex Seadweller Deepsea Review

    Good review and excellent watch.

  4. #104
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,471
    12 years later and still wear one
    RIAC

  5. #105
    Grand Master wileeeeeey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    18,241
    Very nice. From the looks of the photo a 136660? Glass looks elevated like the Daytona.

  6. #106
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,471
    Quote Originally Posted by wileeeeeey View Post
    Very nice. From the looks of the photo a 136660? Glass looks elevated like the Daytona.
    No. Not sure about the 13 as that protruding edge will attract more nibbles on the crystal edge. Plus no divers link! Not ideal so 12 will do
    RIAC

  7. #107
    Grand Master wileeeeeey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    18,241
    Quote Originally Posted by 100thmonkey View Post
    No. Not sure about the 13 as that protruding edge will attract more nibbles on the crystal edge. Plus no divers link! Not ideal so 12 will do
    Angle made it look like a 13- but not much difference in it.

    No divers link was a plus for me on the 13-. AD refused to remove it on the 12- claiming unauthorised modification so gave me one less thing to do when I got the new one.

  8. #108
    Grand Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    19,471
    Quote Originally Posted by wileeeeeey View Post
    Angle made it look like a 13- but not much difference in it.

    No divers link was a plus for me on the 13-. AD refused to remove it on the 12- claiming unauthorised modification so gave me one less thing to do when I got the new one.
    I always remove them myself only a link.

    The 13 Crystal is too pronounced for me personally.
    RIAC

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Do Not Sell My Personal Information