Search:

Seen stronger [emoji48]

Got no dog in the fight and buyers reputation seems solid tbh. I do think he could still contact his CC company though to point out their False claim of “not as described” is causing an issue. I...

The good thing about these 256 posts is that you don’t have to read them all. Pick any 5 in a row - it’s been on repeat cycle for days now. Don’t think there’s anything new being said any more.

Has buyer contacted cc company and told them “thanks for the refund but your method was inaccurate as it was never opened to BE as described”? If they (the CC company) drop a note to Paypal...

Bit strong that sir. More likely is that Paypal pigeon holed the case under a category that suits them ie not as described. It does create opportunity for the OP to pursue PP for this error, assuming...

Well to be “not as described” one would have to view an item to reach such conclusion, and no item received apparently so yes this makes sense to me.

I thought that too, but then found out it was back in July. I think the idea of a written letter from Deckard to EMS saying it was settled due to being not received and clarifying it is not for the...

Apologies. Never realized it was July.

Re the RM “checking ID”. In my experience a flash of any old photo card gets no more than a cursory glance from the staff. I was even told once as I dug out...

Bet a neighbor has picked it up - I’m an optimist at heart - so hopefully for all concerned it will turn up once they realise it’s not a parcel for them. There are still good people in the world.

In your 4th last paragraph I take it you mean the “buyer” not the “seller”

Finding it very hard to understand how the youwereout card could be taken to the sorting office and signed for with ID if it wasn’t the buyer. Complete unfortunate mess all round. Sad to hear, but...