Search:

Maybe a refund could of been given via BT initially as a sign of ‘goodwill’ so the buyer isn’t out of pocket


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In all honesty this isn’t a business it’s a forum of like minded enthusiasts and I believe in the main part a forum of very few scam artists. Refunding immediately would of been the best way forward...

I think you are right there. But if this was me as a seller I’d refund the buyer and then start the process and I think that it would of been easier then. As the buyer would not of had to go to his...

Agreed and I think he has done a good amount to help. Despite the seller not refunding him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are the seller. You are the one with the onus to make sure the buyer receives their goods. They haven’t. And what has happened is not your fault but as a seller you need to accept they need their...

Could the buyer not use a DSAR (data subject access request) in order to obtain the CCTV showed ‘them’ signing for the parcel? At which point they can point out its not them? I know DSAR works with...

CCTV Is your only option! RM do not always follow their rules. This week alone I have picked up a parcel addressed to my wife sent RMSD with no card and no need for ID.
Many times I can pick up...