I like all three versions; each has their pros and cons.
I suppose if you wanted a really accurate re-creation of the original it would be the Mk 1 with the thinner / finer printing of the Mk 2. ...
Type: Posts; User: Rev-O
I like all three versions; each has their pros and cons.
I suppose if you wanted a really accurate re-creation of the original it would be the Mk 1 with the thinner / finer printing of the Mk 2. ...
Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, "dished" rather than convex. I think that lip around the edge is the recess for the armoured crystal retaining ring. Been awhile since I had one apart.
No, both flat; the W10 looks curved (convex) but that's the low-dome armoured acrylic crystal.
Following on from this thread https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?459002-Old-PRS-29-vs-New-PRS-29
Here's some pics of a little trio: dad and his two sons maybe?
Smiths W10 (from 1967) ->...